Product Review - Myryad MC-100 CD Player -
November, 1997
By Karl Suager
Click to see larger photo |
Myryad MC-100 CD Player; 1 bit PLM D/A converters; 8x
oversampling; Frequency response 20 Hz - 20 kHz, +/- 0.3dB; THD 0.003% @1kHz; S/N ratio
104 dB; Dynamic range (like every linear system with 16 bit resolution) 96dB; Output
impedance 250 ohms; Dimensions 17" (436mm) W x 3 3/4" (95mm) H x 11 1/4"
(286 mm) D; Weight 12 1/2 lbs. (5.6 kg.); Suggested Retail (U.S.A.) - $1,200; Europe:
Myryad Systems Ltd., 2 Pipers Wood, Waterberry Drive, Waterlooville, U.K. PO7 7XU. Tel:
(01705) 265508 Fax:(01705) 231407; Distributed in U.S.A. by Audio Influx Corporation.
Have you ever heard this?: "DVD audio is just around the corner! Digital sound at 96
kHz and 24 bits is going to be sooooo much better. Buying any digital product now is a
waste of money." Oh, is it now? Where is it DVD audio now? How many 96
kHz/24bit-sampled recordings do we have anyway? I can't assume personal knowledge of
everyone else's CD collection, but I don't have any. It's probably going to be a while
before I do. The DVD audio standard, to the best of my knowledge, hasn't solidified. When
it does, you can be pretty sure that it's going to take some time to sell 99% of the
population on the idea that they're going to benefit from a quality substantially better
than the current CD format. Not to say either that 96/24, or even 96/20 won't yield
improvements in digital design, but don't hold your breath for it to become a
"defacto" standard.
I certainly understand the reluctance to buy into current technology when new standards
seem eminent, so caution certainly warrants attention. But if you've got the rest of your
system settled, and you want to upgrade your CD player, what's stopping you? If and/or
when DVD becomes an audio standard, you'll still have your old CDs, just as some kept
their vinyl after the previous technological turnover. DVD players can play current CDs,
it's true, but that's not the issue squirming in our hands, now, is it? What do we have to
choose from now, and how do we make the selection once we know what the choices are? If
you're not into video as much as musical reproduction, it doesn't seem to make much sense
to pay for video features in a component. If you don't have 96/24 recordings, and neither
is the playback equipment available, then where does it leave you? If playing CDs now and
for the next few years is your primary goal, a CD player is the most sensible choice. It
may not be 96/24, but the recordings are 44.1/16 which sound pretty good to me.
Yes, a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz vs. 96 kHz does mean that ultrasonic filters must be
nearer the audio band, but there's a lot more to playback quality than the digital
filters. Although the quality of the DAC section in any component is of critical
importance, of equal importance is the circuitry around it which keeps noise from various
sources out of the analog signal. Regardless of the recording resolution, or the DAC
resolution, the integrity of the analog path is one of the determining factors in sound
quality.
And so we come to the Myryad MC-100 CD player. A first glance might cause one to mistake
it for your average CD player with the exception of a stylish heavy face plate and
well-designed ergonomics. Aesthetically, it appeals to those who prefer clean and
functional. No fancy flashing lights or gizmos, just the basic operational functions, and
a handy comfortable remote with the same front functions in addition to programming,
display settings, and a bunch of number keys. A closer look reveals a very solid chassis.
Well-built, but not overbuilt.
When I removed the cover, I noticed a few points of interest. Aside from a rather standard
Sony transport, the build of this unit is simple but excellent. The metal screws were not
simply threaded directly into the meatier-than-most sheet metal, they fit into machined
inserts which then are embedded in the inner chassis. A steel plate separates the control
PCB which houses the display and control buttons, shielding the other circuitry from
possible detrimental noise. Inside, a conspicuous low EMI-generating toroidal transformer
with a bunch of secondary taps feed a small PCB. (The higher bandwidth of toroidal
transformers provides less filtering from AC line noise, but this can be addressed with
power conditioning.) I learned from Chris Evans, the technical whiz at Myryad, that there
are three separate secondary taps for the analog circuits, the digital circuits, and the
transport functions. From here it gets even more interesting.
On that PCB, fed by those three secondaries, are eleven separately regulated power
supplies for the master clock, the left channel DAC output, the right channel DAC output,
a pair for the 6 pole (36dB/octave) low pass filters and DC servos, and the output stages.
The ribbon cable, connecting the main circuit board to the power supply board, wears a
ferrite bead for additional noise filtering, both from RF on the AC line, and from EMI
that otherwise might leak onto the AC line and affect other components. How considerate!
All of this ensures maximum noise isolation so that each set of components can do its job
with minimal interference via their power sources. Otherwise, digital switching noise
could make its way into the analog signal, noise could adversely affect the master clock,
introducing jitter, and all the nice digital parts would be for naught because the analog
product has degenerated. Obviously, the designers of the MC-100 addressed this. It may
seem a little extreme at first, but wait, there's more.
The master clock, running at 8x over-sampling (over 33 MHz,) controls both the servos on
the transport and 1 bit PLM DACs (Sony's method to take advantage of the inherent
linearity of bit-stream.) These DACs, four of them, operate in dual-differential
(push-pull). The active filters are also dual-differential, Class A, for lower distortion
and better noise immunity, as are the output stages operating on 60 V rails, (that's power
amplifier voltage) just to be sure the rated 2V output at the maximum 0dB is never
strained. The outputs are sturdy gold-plated RCAs.
There's a standard 75 Ohm coaxial digital output, and a couple of RCAs for MyLink
operation which allows you to control player (DELETE ON/OFF) with the MI-120 integrated
amplifier REMOTE. At Secrets, we support family values, so we reunited the pair (MI-120
and MC-100) just for this occasion. The power switch is also on the back, leaving a
standby switch on the front for day to day operation. I'd like to get back to that later.
The literature I received made a big hubbub about great error correction and the ability
to track damaged discs. In this regard, however, I found the player to be unexceptional. A
scratched disc, which the current Harman Kardon changers could also not track properly,
(not skipping but the fffft, fffttt, fffft, sounds imposing on the recorded material) gave
the MC-100 player an equally hard time. My Pioneer laserdisc player and the Cary CD-302
which uses the Pioneer stable platter mechanism, as well as a Yamaha CD changer, had no
difficulty with the same disc. Not a big deal, and it should be noted that tracking
ability has very little, if nothing, to do with jitter and the subsequent audio
performance. It is, however, something to take into consideration if you have a lot of
scratched discs you don't want to replace.
With that blurb out of the way, how did it sound? What? You care about sound? The specs
are nice and respectable, isn't that enough? For some people it might be, and although I
believe many sonic differences between accurate components may be indeed subtle, I'm not
in the "less than 0.5% THD sounds the same" camp. If you've gotten this far,
you're probably maintaining a similar frame of thought. Hmm.. How to describe. Don't
forget about that rear power switch.
When I first plugged it in, I noticed how this player just sounded pretty clean. It wasn't
bright, harsh, extraordinarily in-your-face detailed. As I settled in with it, I met more
things in some of the music I previously took for granted. The sense of space was good,
but what really wicked my whiskers were aspects like the flow of air in a saxophone,
migrations along strings by fingers, picks, and bows, and the decay of ambient
information. High-hats and cymbals simmered like an anxious dinner without hotness or
irritating grain. Higher frequencies might be this player's forte - clean, exact,
effortlessly apparent. On the other side, though, when it comes to the MC-100's bass, it's
as subjectively tight and extended as program material dictates. The mid-range, well, it
seemed to depend, which is why I'm bringing up that rear power switch.
When I first turned the unit on, the middle of the spectrum took the role of slightly
polite and fairly detailed, not exactly a perfect match to its brethren above and below
but, for the most part similar. Perhaps just a little less opened up than I'd prefer, but
entirely acceptable, except for one funny nut. I thought, just maybe, that the upper
mid-range could turn just a bit hard. Not harsh, not forward, but perhaps just overly
deliberate. I hesitate to bring it up because I don't consider it a problem. Ever since a
day or so after I first powered it up, I haven't been able to foster that impression at
all. In fact, after a couple weeks, I can't pick a flaw to complain about. Either I was
imagining it in the first place, got used to it, or the power switch is in the rear for a
reason. Perhaps this implies that it is best to leave the player turned on to
"Standby" because it sounds better warmed up.
Is it a perfect player? I never said that. The MC-100 doesn't have the Holy Shiite
dimensionality of the over $10,000 Wadia combos (but the extension on the top end might
prove superior.) It doesn't quite have the bare and brutal transparency of an Aragon D2A
mkII driven by an EAD transport, (but possibly could prove more enjoyable for most
recorded pieces of music.) It doesn't have the seductive sweetening of a Cary CD-302 (but
arguably may be more accurate.) It also costs less money than any of them, takes less
space and is, in my opinion, nicer looking. After living with this player for a month, I
can't find anything to complain about. To put everything in a more banal sonic context, it
stomps up and down my laserdisc player without even giving the poor thing a chance to gasp
(and it does gasp on certain difficult transients.) As for the vanishing upper mid-range
hardness, it's not of huge concern to me, but keep in mind to plug it in and switch it to
standby for a day or so before getting critical if you decide to pursue a home evaluation.
If you're in the market for a CD player in this price range, or even somewhere slightly
below or not so slightly above, I really think you should audition the MC-100. I'm not one
to rave, but I really like it.
Let the record show that the MC-100 was evaluated with the following associated
components:
Passive preamp based on a 50kohm Nobel Potentiometer
Myryad MI-120 integrated amplifier, Aragon 8008BB power amplifier
Infinity Renaissance 90 full-range loudspeakers
2 pairs 1/2 meter DH Labs Silver Sonic interconnects
3 pairs 5' braided DH Labs Silver Sonic speaker wire
Bybee/Curl Power Purifiers (Prototype Modules)
Audio Power Industries Power Pack V AC line conditioner
Karl Suager
� Copyright 1997 Secrets of Home Theater & High
Fidelity
Return to Table of Contents for this Issue.