Product Review
 

Final Sound 1000i ST Full-Range Electrostatic Speakers and S220 Subwoofer

Part IV

August, 2007

John E. Johnson, Jr.

 

On the Bench

1000i

The microphone was placed 12" from the middle of the panel for the distortion tests, and 1 meter for the room response test. I used a standard SPL value of 90 dB instead of 100 dB since half the sound was going out the rear, away from the microphone. THD+N measurements were within a 10 Hz to 22 kHz bandwidth.

At 100 Hz, THD+N was less than 4%. This is somewhat more than you might find with a conventional woofer driver, and as I mentioned, ESLs have a tough time with low bass.

At 1 kHz, 0.5% THD+N.

And, at 10 kHz, THD+N was 0.8%. This is less than many other conventional tweeters.

IMD using a SMPTE/DIN standard test, was 0.8%. I could test this (IMD) here because the 1000i panel reproduces both sine waves, rather than a tweeter reproducing one and a woofer reproducing the other.

The room response was reasonably flat down to about 60 Hz. The deep valleys are room issues. It rolled off a bit above 16 kHz.

The impedance stays at least 8 ohms up to about 1 kHz, then goes down to a low of slightly less than 2 ohms at 12 kHz. The large peak is due to the transformer. It stays below 4 ohms between 4.5 kHz and 20 kHz, so you should use a good amplifier that is rated into 2 ohms. As the sensitivity is only 86 dB, I would suggest at least 200 watts per channel.

The second graph shows the same impedance curve in an expanded scale.

The electrical phase stays within ± 600.

Go to Part V.

© Copyright 2007 Secrets of Home Theater & High Fidelity

Go to Table of Contents for this Issue.

Go to Home Page.

 

About Secrets

Register

Terms and Conditions of Use
 

PAGEFEEDBACK
Our Vault pages may have some display quirks. Let us know if we need to take a look at this page or fix a bug.
SUBMIT FEEDBACK
Connect with us
  • Instagram
  • Google+
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
Secrets "Cave"
Facebook
Close