It has been almost 10 years since I last reviewed some B&W speakers.
I was very much impressed with the
600 Series back then, and I decided it was high time that I discovered
what sonic nirvana might be available in other B&Ws.
So, I obtained a pair of 804S floor-standing
speakers and an HTM3S center channel speaker.
The 600 series is still around, although they have
somewhat different driver arrangements than when I first reviewed them. The
600 series are value priced.
The 800 series is two series up from the 600 line.
They have tube-loaded tweeters and midrange drivers, each in their own
enclosure. The woofers are therefore contained within a separate enclosure
In the case of the 804S, the speaker is ported,
while the HTM3S is sealed.
The "S" designation is for "Standard Version". There
is also a "D" version in the 800 series, which means "Diamond Version". The
D version has a tweeter with a diamond coated (vapor deposited) dome
tweeter. We reviewed the S versions of the two speakers.
There is a lot of interesting technology associated
with the 800 series, that is not something you would see when you look at
For example, the magnet pole in the tweeter is
coated with silver. This extends the response. Secondly, the midrange driver
uses a neodymium-iron-boron magnet. This provides so much magnetic field
strength, that the field remains constant over the entire movement of the
voice coil. There is only one capacitor for the tweeter, and air core
inductors are used for the midrange and woofers. All contacts are gold
The real wood veneers are exquisite on these
speakers. I suppose they have automated the construction process, but it is
difficult to imagine how a veneer wrapping machine could get it so smooth
around the curved sides.
One of the reasons I wanted to test the 804S with
the HTM3S is that both of these speakers have the same driver configuration.
The only differences are in the overall size, along with the 804S being
ported, while the HTM3S is sealed. For many of us, the center channel
speaker is much different than the front left/right, and this causes
tonality changes as the sound pans across the front sound stage.
There are LCR speakers out there which have identical layouts of the drivers, and one
is simply placed on its side for the center. However, LCR speakers are
generally smaller, rather than being floor-standers. So, here, we have a
large full-range speaker for the front left/right, and the center has the
same drivers, but is configured differently (tweeter above the midrange, and
woofers to the sides).
You can see in the photo below that the tweeter sits
on top of the main enclosure. If you gently push on the side, the tweeter
moves, so it appears to be mounted on a flexible attachment. This would
minimize transfer of vibrational energy from the main enclosure to the
tweeter enclosure. Note also the small metal tube protruding from the rear
of the tweeter enclosure. It has a hole on the end, and I am sure this is
not for looks. Both the main enclosure and tweeter enclosure are rounded.
This reduces standing waves, but of course, increases manufacturing costs.
Not only does the tweeter have its own enclosure,
but the midrange driver as well. This means that all three driver sets
(tweeter, midrange, and woofers) are in their own box.
The speakers come with a set of bus wires for connecting the
tweeter and midrange/woofers together, but they are not attached at the time
of unpacking. Unless you are going to bi-wire or bi-amp the speakers, don't forget to attach the
before you use them.
I utilized the two 804S as front left/right speakers
in our home theater lab, with the HTM3S as the center channel speaker. I used
various other speakers at the sides and rear, but also listened to the 804S
as a stereo pair.
Associated equipment included a McCormack Audio CD
transport and DAC, Yamaha universal player, BAT preamplifier, Lexicon MC-12 SSP, McIntosh
power amplifiers, BAT power amplifier, and Nordost cables.
I toed the 804S in slightly. The HTM3S was placed on
a stand about 22" from the floor.
One of the big problems with using ribbon and
electrostatic speakers, which are the speakers I listen to most often, is
that they take a lot of power to drive them due to their low sensitivity.
This is compounded by low impedance, so I need big amplifiers. That is why I
use McIntosh and BAT for reference. The MC-1201s, for example, are 1,200
watts RMS monoblocks, each weighing about 150 pounds.
So, with the B&Ws, which have a sensitivity of 90 dB,
it was very nice not to have to turn the volume control up so high in order
to get room filling sound. And, I mean it was a huge difference.
Instead of a volume control setting of 60, it was more like 28. The needles
on the McIntosh power meters were bouncing up at about 1/3 scale instead of
more than half way.
The power requirement differences did not surprise
me. I expected that, knowing the sensitivity specs.
What did surprise me is how the B&W tweeters sounded
very much like my beloved ribbons.
One of the things I like about ribbons is that they
don't sound "tizzy" or metallic. Dome tweeters, especially metal ones,
usually do sound that way to me. I was expecting that to happen with the
B&Ws, but to my delight, no tizziness, even when putting my ears up close.
This is not the D version of the tweeter, so it is not the diamond coating.
It must be something to do with the rounded, tubular enclosure. Whatever.
This is a great tweeter. One of the best I have ever heard.
If your speakers are too far apart in relation to
your sitting distance, you can get a hole in the middle effect. It is more
of a problem with some speakers than others, partly due to the dispersion
characteristics. I like to use a big projection screen, which means the front
left/right speakers have to be set wide, and I get the hole in the middle
when just playing two-channel stereo.
So, here was another surprise. The 804S speakers did
not produce the hole in the middle with stereo CDs even when the speakers
had wide spacing. Of
course, one can always switch over to one of the three-speaker modes (left,
center, right) that we get on typical receivers these days, but the point
is, that it was not necessary here. Talk about good dispersion patterns!
The review models are rated at 200 - 250 watts of
amplifier power, and with a sensitivity of 90 dB, that kind of power really
did fill the room. I listen to orchestral music, and I like action movies.
So, the B&Ws got a real workout.
Orchestral recordings were full bodied, always
detailed, and never mushy or smeared. The latest movie I watched with the
B&Ws was Alexander, which among other things, has plenty of gut
wrenching sound. This all came through clearly. Voices, even during battle
scenes, were intelligible, and it is this intelligibility during intense
sound effects, that is one of the best tests for a center channel speaker.
There was plenty of bass with the two 804S, and
certainly with the HTM3S added as a third speaker. Of course, a good
subwoofer will always plumb the depths at 20 Hz, which floor-standers have a
difficult time with. B&W has a number of fine subs that would mate with
the 804S and HTM3S.