used a McCormack CD transport and DAC, a Yamaha universal DVD player, a Lexicon MC-12 preamp/processor, Balanced Audio Technology VK-5i
preamp, and various Nordost interconnects for the tests. Everything else in the chain was
the speaker cables.
two Kayas were used as the front left and right, the two Kachinas as rear
surrounds, and the Tehya as the center.
Because of the narrow dispersion, I toed the Kayas and Kachinas in at an angle steep
enough to point them directly at me, which was about 300. All
speakers were several feet out from the rear and side walls. The Tehya
center channel was placed on a stand 24" off the floor.
Although I am quite familiar with planar sound, my experiences are primarily
with two-channel configurations. I was not prepared for ESL in 5.1 surround, which was, to
say the least, spectacular.
all in the details, and that is where the Innersound ESLs excel. Such fine
detail, coupled with the huge soundstage that large drivers give, is
something that has to be heard to be believed.
the leading edge of classical guitar, to the leading edge of machine gun
fire, this was jaw dropping sound.
listened to stereo music, SACD and DVD-A music in 5.1 surround, and movies
in 5.1 surround. There was not a single instance that did not amaze my ears.
of the most interesting observations was how the lack of wide dispersion was
made up for by the sound seeming to be projected. Voices were much easier to
understand with most of the sound coming to my location rather than being
spread out over a wider area. This is a new discovery for me with regard to
planar speakers, and probably because I had very little experience with a
center channel ESL. Previously, voices had come from my front left and right ESLs, in stereo, rather than from a single ESL speaker in the center.
Maybe there is an advantage to narrow dispersion as long as you are sitting
in the sweet spot.
Transparency and clarity were all that I have come to expect from a fine ESL
design. The bass had a wider dispersion than the highs, due to the
wavelengths being longer than the width of the driver, but that is the case
with any speaker.
There was no sibilance to voices, and I was surprised at how well the bass
from the cone woofers blended with the ESL panels. It was also quite deep, a
result of the transmission line loading.
get older, I find myself being more sensitive to high frequency distortion,
the harshness that sometimes happens with various tweeters, but there was
none of that with the Innersounds. It was a very natural, very open sound
that is easy to love.
Innersound power amplifiers were driven hard, and never sounded like they
were losing their grip. They always sounded clean and crisp, and only got
slightly warm with extended use.
Kachina sounded much like the Kaya, only not quite as "big". Surprisingly,
even though the Tehya is much smaller than either the Kaya or Kachina, it
still had a large presentation, undoubtedly because the ESL panel is much
bigger than any conventional cone tweeter or midrange driver. You could also
use a Kaya for the center, but you would need a transparent projection
screen. In any case, the Tehya seemed perfectly suited to the task.
Although the adjustment knobs on the Kachina and Tehya work well for
balancing the bass with the mids and highs coming from the ESL panel, I prefer
the Kaya method which utilizes a separate power amplifier for the woofer, with the built-in EQ that allows for separate bass and mid-bass increments.
On the Bench
There are a lot of graphs to show here, so let's get started.
the ESL main panel, at 1 kHz, and 100 dB, THD was a very low 0.4%.
using 1 kHz and 1.5 kHz sine wave signals was also low.
0.012% IMD was seen, using 5 kHz and 6 kHz sine wave input signals.
10 kHz and 100 dB, THD was less than 1%.
Again, IMD was low, when using 10 kHz and 11 kHz input signals.
for the woofer.
a 10" woofer, having less than 10% THD at 20 Hz and 100 dB is excellent
performance. I was surprised.
25 Hz, THD plummets to less than 4%.
1.6% THD was measured at 31.5 Hz. Very good.
Hz only produced about 1% THD.
than 1% THD at 50 Hz and 100 dB.
is the room response for the Kaya, at 2 meters, on-axis. Note the high
look at the room response, at 2 meters, but 300 off-axis. See how the high
frequencies fall off in relation to the low frequencies. This is one of the
problems with planar speakers. Aficionados of planar speakers just learn to
live with this, and sit on-axis when doing critical listening.
did notice a significant amount of resonance when I rapped on the side
panels near the main ESL panel. So, I measured the rap resonance. It has
peaks at 60 Hz, 180 Hz, and 270 Hz. But, they did not show up in full
spectrum white noise frequency
response measurements to any significant degree. However, peaks for these
resonance frequencies did show up in the woofer tests with single input
frequencies (see above). In any case, I would
suggest taming them with vibration damping pads (e.g.,
NAVCOM) mounted on the inside of the panels
where they would not show, if the same color as the enclosure is used. I
would probably also use a couple of small round dowels that would span
across the panels, near the outer edges, attaching the panels together,
damping their tendency to vibrate individually. (The reason the wood panels
are there is to reduce the cancellation that occurs between the sound coming
out the front and back of the ESL driver.)
is the MLS quasi-anechoic response of the ESL panel. It falls off below 500
the MLS response of the woofer. It falls off above 500 Hz. The two drivers
are well matched to one another.
impedance and phase measurements for the ESL panel give unusual results, due
to the presence of the transformer in the signal path. The peak in impedance
at 1.8 kHz is the transformer inductance. The review unit was an early
model, and the latest ones have the peak at 500 Hz. Capacitive
reactance causes the electrical phase reversal at 1.8 kHz.
impedance of the woofer averages about 8 Ohms in its useful frequency range.
The phase stays within ±
300 in that range also.
room response for the Tehya center channel speaker was about the same as the
Kaya, perhaps even a little smoother.
enough graphs? Sorry, here are some more, in Part III.