Surround Sound Speaker Systems
- Written by Rick Schmidt
- Published on 29 May 2008
A couple of years ago, I reviewed some nice sounding kit speakers from Raw Acoustics that used a ribbon tweeter. In some ways, the Focal tweeter outperformed all other tweeters I heard, I felt like I could hear into the sound of high hats or female voices like I hadnâ€™t before, though there was some emphasis on the high end overall. When I got the DA-2.1â€™s and then the Focalâ€™s I spent some time swapping between them and with my old school Gold Sound kit #9â€™s. With the twin tweeters on the DAâ€™s and the beryllium tweeter on the Focalâ€™s, the old Gold Sounds were left in the dust. They just had a dark sound to them by comparison. I hadnâ€™t really noticed this before the tweeter parade started in my house, so to some extent it is something that ears adjust to I think.
Between the Focals and DAs itâ€™s a tougher choice. The Focalâ€™s were picky about setup in my room, but once adjusted, they were terrific speakers, and the imaging was the best of the three. My room is not set up for good imaging, so Iâ€™m always surprised when this happens. The one thing the beryllium tweeters did better than any other tweeter Iâ€™ve heard is that hollow sound that high hat cymbals make when they are being open and closed via the foot petal. There is a splashy sound to that like any cymbal, but there is also the hollow sound created by the space between them. It was somewhere on disc 1 of the 2006 Tortoise box set A Lazarus Taxon, and when I listened toÂ it, I realized Iâ€™d never heard a speaker do that sound as well. It may be because the tweeter has a peak in its frequency response in just the right spot or it may be their shape and stiffness mean that its better suited for this.
Overall though, I think the DA1s have the best solution. By doubling up the tweeters, the listener gets a significant step towards the sound of a ribbon tweeter without peakiness or glare and without the hassle of directionality and beaming. In fact, by pointing the two tweeters in slightly different directions, the DAs create a remarkably even sound throughout the room and adjacent rooms.
I write these articles in a finished attic above the room with my main stereo in it. I can be all the way up here, hearing the Daedalusâ€™ though the staircase and they sounds great.
Imaging is likely sacrificed by this tweeter arrangement though.Â I canâ€™t say for sure because, as I said, my listening room is not set up well for this, thereâ€™s too much distance and stuff between the speakers.
The tweeter switch on the back of the 2.1s did not make the Daedalusâ€™ sound like the Focals in the Boost position or as subdued as my Gold Sounds when in the Attenuate position. It didnâ€™t go that far. I did find it useful once or twice with some CDs that I thought had too much edginess or were dark. This switch could also be useful to balance out speaker cable differences though I found the 2.1s to be rather immune to cable choice and I had some remarkably expensive and remarkably cheap cables during this review period. Iâ€™m still experimenting with cables, and I am sad to report that yes there is a difference. Sad because I think the prices charged for some of these cables are not reasonable.
So how do the Daedalus 2.1s sound overall? The twin cloth dome tweeters bring you all the highs in the most unobtrusive way. There are no discernable peaks, but everything is there.Â The speaker seems to present no significant load to my Simaudio W6 amps. Transients come and go with ease. This makes the rhythm and pace spot on. Itâ€™s a feeling of lightness or effortlessness. Neither amps nor ears are burdened with complexities. In doing all of this speaker swapping, I relied heavily on "Teardrop" by Massive Attack. Massive Attack is famous for working with all the best female vocalists, and in this case itâ€™s the incomparable Elizabeth Frasier of the Cocteau Twins. When I hear this song on good hi-fi, I swoon, and with the Daedalus, I swooned. I could hear details in the vocal presentation that werenâ€™t there with the Focalâ€™s or Gold Sounds. Details such as breathing and those little growly bits in the back of the throat. You want to hear those, trust me. This track has a rim shot on a snare drum throughout. Each of the speakers I tried had a different resolution of this. It's hard to say which was best, they were just different, each sounded authentic. On this track and with some intense rock music such as that by Sonic Youth, the Daedalus never merged instruments together. It was always easy to pick out and enjoy each instrument. This is the difference with good hi-fi that you can point out to non-believers.
Another Massive Attack song,Â "Protection" has become my standard for bass analysis. The 15â€ JBL woofers on my old Gold Sounds won this one hands down. When they are not exciting room modes, the bass from these reveals textures and nuance in heavy bass lines that smaller speakers will just never give you. The Daedalus 2.1s come remarkably close though. Most of detail is there, just not in your face like with my oversize JBLs. I had to tune into it a little to notice it. This may actually be more in line with the mix that the artists intended, hard to say with electronica. Overall though, with my heavy rock and electronica listening, I could do with just a little more bass. Lou Hinkley offered that the 2.1s do sound best with a subwoofer added. I did not get to this, as my back was not approving of the idea of lugging my subwoofer up to my main stereo room.
Iâ€™ve mentioned in previous reviews how I think you can deduce the type of music that some hi-fi manufactures listen to by what their equipment does best on. These speakers were terrific for everything I played on them, but voices and guitars were the most striking. With guitars, the string overtones, the plucking, the overtones from the body of the guitar, I heard these more accurately than with any other speaker Iâ€™ve auditioned. The Focals, when properly set up, would have all those same parts present but in different degrees, that, in the end, sounded less realistic.
In the Home Theater
IÂ didnâ€™t want to move my subwoofer upstairs, nor did I want to move the 2.1s downstairs to my home theater room. During this review period I developed my semi-annual back problem. I was able to convince Lou Hinkley to stop by and move the 2.1s downstairs for me. My home theater room is really too small for these speakers and even for the center channel. Still, they represented a significant improvement over my reference Aperions which retail for about 1/10th as much.
The Daedalus center is a full range speaker compared to my much smaller Aperion. Voices, music, whatever were more natural and easier to listen to. The main thing the Daedalus revealed to me though was the difference between my amps. If the Daedalus' were getting the best out of my Simaudio setup upstairs, they were revealing the shortcomings, relatively speaking, of my old Outlaw 770 in my home theater room. It soundedÂ good, yes, but I knew the speakers could deliver more, and it just wasnâ€™t there in that setup. Of course, this should be expected given the price difference. Match your components carefully and try them out at home if you can.
The Daedalus 2.1s seem to transcend the notion of fatigue, moving to the other side of the scale: listener rejuvenation? Call it what you will, I canâ€™t seem to stop listening. My Tivo is full, and my Netflix is backed up because music has jumped to the top of my priorities. Good thing because Iâ€™ve got lots of records. Music server? Whatâ€™s that? Iâ€™d recommend these speakers in a heartbeat. I may well purchase them, Iâ€™m going to give a re-listen to the Daedalus 1.1â€™s which have an extra woofer added, they cost a bit more too. Stay tuned to find out which I choose.