Home Subwoofers JL Audio Fathom f113 Subwoofer
Subwoofers
JL Audio Fathom f113 Subwoofer
Written by John E. Johnson, Jr.   
Wednesday, 09 July 2008 17:00
Article Index
JL Audio Fathom f113 Subwoofer
Page 2: Fathom f113 Sound
Page 3: Fathom f113 Distortion Measurements
Page 4: Conclusions About the Fathom f113 Subwoofer
All Pages

Introduction

Following Colin Miller's review of the JL Audio f112 subwoofer, I knew I just had to try one out. So, I contacted JL Audio and asked if I could obtain the f113. They said yes, and a week later, there it was on my driveway.

Well, to start with, this is definitely not an item that you should try to move around by yourself.

jl-audio-f113-subwoofer-drawing.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some subwoofers just need a hand cart, and this is one of them.

So, after turning the box upside down, pulling the box off, then putting it on the hand cart and moving it into the lab, I was ready to go.

Specifications

  • Design: Sealed Enclosure
  • Driver: One 13.5"
  • Power: 2,500 Watts RMS, Switching
  • MFR: 20 Hz - 86 Hz, ± 1.5 dB, - 3 dB at 18 Hz
  • Automatic Room Optimization (ARO) with Included Microphone
  • Inputs: XLR and RCA
  • Dimensions: 19.6" H x 16.5" W x 19.3" D
  • Weight: 130 Pounds
  • MSRP: $3,600 Satin Black, $3,700 Gloss Black
  • JL Audio

The Design

The f113 uses a driver that is 13.5" in diameter. The reason for this is that most people want a subwoofer that is not going to take up a lot of space, but yet, still deliver deep bass. That is a big task. The 12" drivers are OK, 15" and 18" drivers too big. So, 13.5" was chosen as a size that could still fit into a "not too big" enclosure, but give more bass than the conventional 12" driver.

Well, laws of physics being what they are, 13.5" is not as capable as conventional 15" and 18" drivers, with everything else being the same. So, how to make the 13.5" driver deliver? Build it with a huge excursion (movement from front to back). And, in fact, I found this driver to be capable of higher excursion than even the 18" subwoofers I have seen in the past. I couldn't exactly stick a ruler in there when it was moving, but judging from the blur of the logo, I think it was a little more than 2" at 20 Hz and full output, continuous.

JL Audio says that the excursion capability for this driver is 4" peak-to-peak, which would occur during transients, rather than what I obtained during continuous output. Such a large excursion is simply unheard of for a driver less than 15" in diameter. This, to me, is what you are paying for in the f113 $3,600 price tag. The unit weighs in at 130 pounds, and I suspect the driver is most of that. I mean, for its physical size, this thing is a hunk of stuff.

The amplifier is a switching design and can deliver 2,500 watts RMS on a short term basis. That's the second thing you need with a reasonably small enclosure and massive driver: a BIG amplifier.

There are lots of features on the f113, all controlled from the front instead of the rear. Some that you won't find on most other subwoofers include the ability to adjust the low-pass slope (12 dB/octove or 24 dB/octave) and the ability to choose 00 or 1800 polarity plus adjust the phase in between those values. You can also boost the output at 25 Hz or trim it up to 12 dB at 25 Hz (called ELF) to make particular room situations less boomy.

jl-audio-f113-subwoofer-control-panel.jpg

 

Lastly, a trend these days is having the ability to automatically EQ the subwoofer for your listening position, and the f113 has that feature, called ARO, for Automatic Room Optimization. A microphone is included (see photo below). You simply plug in the mike, push the Calibrate button, sit down and hold the microphone by your head, and wait for the test tones to finish. Once that is done, the Calibrate button will glow with a green light. If it blinks fast, you need to turn down the volume, if it blinks slowly, you need to turn it up, and re-calibrate.

jl-audio-f113-subwoofer-front-with-microphone.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The rear of the enclosure has a large set of heat sinks. I guess they assume you are going to crank this thing up (I qualify as a subwoofer cranker). There are XLR as well as RCA line-level inputs and an XLR slave output so you can drive two or more subs at the same time. You can lift the ground if you are getting hum from one of the other components in your system, but this is only if you are using the RCA input.


The Sound

I tested the f113 with a Sony BDP-S1 Blu-ray player, MToshiba HD-A1 HD-DVD player, Lexicon MC-12B SSP, Classé CA-5200 power amplifier, and Carver Amazing ribbon speakers. Cables were Nordost and Legenburg.

I watched a number of movies with this subwoofer (while reviewing that great Marantz projector of a few weeks ago), and I finally got around to opening the HD-DVDs that I bought at discount when the HD-DVD format was terminated.

One of these is a favorite movie of mine, The Dirty Dozen. It has a lot of fine actors, a great director, and a plot that started a whole bunch of imitators. Even if you have never seen the movie, you can tell from the cover art that this film has plenty of explosive action. I love war movies, and I like to experience the intense bass that goes with the stories. The f113 gave me everything I was expecting.

jl-audio-f113-subwoofer-movie-dirty-dozen.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is a more modern film, actually three of them, the Matrix Trilogy. It does not seem to be out on Blu-ray yet, but I imagine it will be. It has to be. All three movies are heavy on the action and on the sound, but my favorite is Part III, Revolutions. The scenes where the huge robotic machine guns are destroying all the machines coming in through the ceiling are beyond sensational, and they are a magnificent test for any subwoofer. The JL Audio f113 just sailed through them, unfazed. I can't say the same thing for myself, as I sat there, stunned by the intensity. I love this stuff. A great subwoofer can deliver a very large percentage of the home theater movie experience. If you like action movies and don't have a powerful sub, trust me, you are in for a treat when you get one.

jl-audio-f113-subwoofer-movie-matrix.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orchestral music was a cake walk for the f113. It has low distortion, and will reach the depths of musical instruments' fundamentals (the lowest note on a piano is 28 Hz). The old thing about such and such a subwoofer (or speakers) being good for movies while a different sub is more suited to music, well, that is nonsense. What you want is deep, clean, powerful. That kind of sub will handle anything, and the f113 did that in our lab.


On the Bench

THD+N measurements are within an 80 kHz bandwidth.

At 20 Hz, 100 dB, and 1 foot, distortion was 12.3%. This is quite excellent. 20 Hz is very tough to deliver from relatively small enclosures.

At 25 Hz, THD+N came down to 8.2%. I was able to obtain a maximum of 121 dB at 25 Hz and 1 foot. That is a lot of output at such a low frequency.

At 31.5 Hz, it was less than 5%.

At 40 Hz, about 2%.

And at 50 Hz, a very manageable 1.6%.

THD+N vs. Frequency showed the f113 to stay below 10% most of the time, all the way down.

Room response measurements indicated a flat response down to 20 Hz up close, and when the microphone was moved farther away, the room effects entered into the picture. That is where the ARO (Automatic Room Optimization) comes into play.

For the ARO test, we placed the microphone 1 meter from the f113 and set 40 Hz to 100 dB. You can see that the calibration reduced the peak area between 20 Hz and 70 Hz. I imagine future iterations of this woofer will include more EQ bands so that the peak just below 20 Hz and the ones at 70 Hz and 90 Hz could be reduced. This would be a four-band PEQ. I use a crossover at 50 Hz because I have large speakers, so one band would be enough for my setup. But, more EQ bands would still be nice.

All in all, superb performance. Something I might expect from a much larger sub.


Conclusions

With no reservation, and by every standard, this is a world class subwoofer. It has massive output, low distortion, and all from a mid-sized enclosure. The price might put some consumers off, but I never heard anyone complain about investing money in a good subwoofer. Save your pennies, and do it.

Tags: Subwoofers

Comments (15)add comment
...
written by Tim , July 12, 2008

This isn't exactly on the subwoofer topic but I don't know wher else to ask this question. I read on another website that they said they had several times more readers than you guys but whenver I use Google to search home theater topics, Secrets is usally near the top. What is going on?


...
written by JEJ , July 13, 2008

I don't know which other website you are referring to, but no one can really know what the stats are for a particular website except the people who have control of the server's data for that particular website, meaning the server's managers. There are web bot services out there that can estimate traffic, but it is just a guess, that's all. Server data are embedded behind firewalls, and are not accessible by web bots. If a company managed to truly monitor who was accessing every website in the world, some 100,000,000 websites by various estimates, it would take a server farm the size of Idaho. Not to mention they would be breaking federal wire tapping laws. The Secrets website is through a professionally managed server and our data are deeply protected. We do not make our readership number public, although we give those data to our sponsors. The true test of a website's penetration into a broad readership is its placement in Google search engine results, as you have experienced. If you find a website that says their website has more readers than other websites based on web bot data, you can safely laugh in their face, because they are simply afraid of their competitors. A credible website does not have to say, "Ours is bigger than theirs."


Stats
written by Jed , July 14, 2008

Google analytics is universally accepted as an accuate 3rd party verification tool. Most of the LARGER websites like Slashdot, Arstechnica, etc use Google analytics. There is no hiding with that.

Also Alexa gives a good indication of how well placed a website is on the net. The lower the # the better.



...
written by Caci , July 14, 2008

A little HIgh distortion.
Would be cool to test the new HSU sub vs this one...



...
written by JEJ , July 14, 2008

Third party verification tools only show what they call trends. They are not precise measurement tools for traffic. And as to Alexa, that is not accurate at all because you have to sign up for the toolbar to be present on your browser in order for it to measure you as a reader for any particular website. Neither myself or any of my staff have signed up for that toolbar, so Alexa stats don't even include my own staff's hits on our own website. The news is full of critcisms of Alexa rankings as being innaccurate. In fact, there is one A/V website out there where the editors told their readers to sign up for the Alexa toolbar just so they would get higher Alexa rankings. Sorry, but the only true way to judge a website's penetration is by its rankings in the search engine results.


...
written by JEJ , July 14, 2008

The f113 stayed below 10% throughout the low frequencies, and this is very good for the size of the enclosure. These days, consumers want small enclosures, but it is very, very difficult to get a high output at 20 Hz, with low distortion, in a small enclosure.


Stats
written by Jed , July 14, 2008

Google analytics installed on every page of your site will give you nearly 100% accurate traffic informaton. This is an industry accepted tool and whether you choose to believe me or not is up to you.

Yes Alexa does require a toolbar to be installed to count that traffic but since it does it equally for all websites it equalizes the playing field. If you notice the worlds largest websites have the lowest alexa ratings, its no coincidence!

Why is a subwoofer review thread opening a discussion on web stats? This seems more appropriate elsewhere.



...
written by JEJ , July 14, 2008

Well, then, that must be the problem with why some magazine is saying their readership is so much higher than ours. We don't put the Google Analytics script on every page. Just a few pages here and there, because we use Google Analytics for specific isolated purposes, not for the general use by whatever publications there are out there who want to say they are bigger than some other magazine. Thanks for pointing out that the Google script has to be on every page for an accurate set of traffic data. We don't use the analytics script on every page, so that settles the issue. We use a different on-board stats analysis package to get our readership data, which are completely accurate, because they analyze the traffic for every page. And the stats are much higher than Google Analytics, because the Google Analytics results are only for a few specific pages on our website. The best thing for us to do is to find out what websites are using some third party analytics to say what our readership is and then contact their advertisers to let them know they are being fed false information. As to Alexa, it does not treat every website the same, because not every magazine can be said to have the same number of people signed up for the Alexa tool bar. None of my staff use it. I don't use it. But, I guess if an editorial staff of some particular website tells their readers to sign up for it, that would give them a pretty good Alexa rating. I would imagine the editorial staff of such websites are sure to sign up for the Alexa toolbar.


...
written by Tim , July 15, 2008

JEJ this has been very informative and I now know the numbers I was seeing on the other website were misleading. I work for an AV company and I think this kind of info is important for our evaluation of websites in terms of potential advertising. Could you repost this discussion in your blog area so other manufacturers will be likely to find it? I tried to open a blog on this but I can't get it to work.


...
written by JEJ , July 15, 2008

OK, I will do that in the next few days. But I am a bit surprised that any manufacturer out there contemplating advertising on some website would be taken in by that website's stats on the competition.


Something seems askew.
written by Mike , July 23, 2008

It looks like the MiniMe by Earthquake got the same distortion limited output measurements as the mighty JL F113. The MiniMe is tiny, weighs 40lbs, and has a 10 inch woofer. Surely this can't be right.


Ned
written by Jed , July 26, 2008

Be leary of in room distortion measurements and their interpretations. The F113 is a much better sub that the Earthquake in every capacity.


JL Audio Fathom f113 Subwoofer
written by Rick , August 03, 2008

In general, would a full range speaker system such as the Definitive Tech. BP7000SC perform better than using s syatem that requires a separate subwoofer(s)? I am looking at home theater speaker options and think that the f113 is an excellent product, however, if a full range speaker can also go as low and play as clean as the f113, what would be the advantages/disadvantages with regards to overall performance by having the subwoofers & amps built into the main speakers, vs going with a stand alone sub such as the f113?application?


...
written by JEJ , August 04, 2008

Full range speakers with built-in subwoofers can be quite good, but to get down there and wallow in < 20 Hz sound (such as with Jurassic Park), you really need a big sub in its own big enclosure. Full range speakers just don't have the room to do that, unless you went with speakers that are almost the height of your listening room.


F112 or F113
written by BJ , December 04, 2008

First of all...great review. I decided I would try to get opinions from both Colin Miller and yourself on the F112 vs. F113 comparison. I'm in a small room and I watch very few movies. I listen to some music that dips in the 20's (hz) range and listen at low levels. Which of the two subwoofers mentioned would most satisfy my needs?



Write comment
smaller | bigger

Your email is kept private and will not be shown on the website.

 

busy
 
Magazine Web Design, Web Services, and Digital Media Solutions - By: Infoswell Media, Inc.