Home arrow Two-Channel Speakers arrow MartinLogan Spire Floor-standing Electrostatic Hybrid Speakers
MartinLogan Spire Floor-standing Electrostatic Hybrid Speakers
A Secrets Speaker Review
E-mail
Written by John E. Johnson, Jr.   
Sunday, 18 May 2008
Article Table of Contents
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3

On the Bench

For all distortion tests, a bandwidth of 80 kHz was used.

At 1 kHz, 100 dB, and 1 foot from the middle of the ESL panel, THD+N was 0.21%, and was primarily second order. This is important, because many speakers out there have primarily third order harmonics, and even-ordered harmonics are easier on the ears than odd-ordered harmonics. Indeed, when I listened to the Spires at high volume, it did not bother me at all.

I was not able to measure THD+N vs. Frequency in the upper frequency regions at 100 dB using my standard tests because the impedance at 20 kHz is so low, the amount of current delivered at a single sine wave frequency was overheating the resistor in the crossover network. So, I performed a series of other tests, and determined that, at 100 dB output and 1 foot, THD+N is about 0.5% from 100 Hz to 20 kHz, and is 10% at 30 Hz, decreasing to 0.5% at 100 Hz. This is excellent performance.

For the room response, I used a distance of 2 meters. I measured the response with the bass control setting at 0 dB and at - 10 dB. You can see the response is quite flat, with the one room mode bump at 60 Hz. Judging from these curves, if I were to leave the speaker in this placement, I would adjust the bass control to about - 5 dB. Obviously, this is a very useful feature to have.

I did not measure the impedance or phase, because the power amplifier input is in the circuit parallel with the speaker binding posts.

Conclusions

MartinLogan's new Spire electrostatic hybrid speakers are fabulous in my book. They play loud for their size, with great detail in the music, and the distortion profile seems to be primarily second order, which is pleasant rather than irritating as it would be if it were primarily odd-ordered. ESL technology has obviously come a long way since I first heard MartinLogans back in the early 1980's, and I am delighted with the improvements. 

 

Comments (13)add comment
Affordable Speakers
written by JSK , May 21, 2008

While it is always fun to read about mid to high priced speakers, I find myself wishing that you would review more down to earth priced speakers. Aperion Audio, Paradigm, AV123…. all have bookshelf and tower speakers that are moderately priced in a range that most audio enthusiast can afford. I like to read about $5,000 - $10,000 speakers and other high end audio products, but I would like to see more budget minded reviews / articles on your site. Pieces of equipment like Outlaw Audio’s RR2150 stereo receiver come to mind. Maybe pair that with one of Aperion Audio’s new line of affordable speakers / subs for a stereo review. Run a multiple speaker comparison between similar models. The budget minded among us needs more info. A lot of us do not have access to local hi-fi shops to audition speakers.

Also many people are finding that LPs are a wonderful listening experience and that they would like to set up a system to listen to them. I love the new Vinyl vs CD article. It is very informative. But I think it should be followed with a budget system build. I am a child of the tape deck / CD generation so I missed the whole LP thing. It has been very tricky trying to build a system that would not “bust the bank” so I could give LPs a try. I know there are several companies out there that sell turntables but I wouldn’t know a quality turntable from a piece of junk.

Sometimes you make all speakers sound like they are equal. Let us know how you really feel like you did on the Paradigm Studio 20 bookshelf speakers review in 2005. That article is the reason I now own a pair of the Studio 20 V4 speakers. Some of your current articles are better though. I can think of a subwoofer article that was @#%&*!^ awesome .

You have a quality website that I know has strived very hard to please everyone. I just feel that the budget minded are being left out.


...
written by JEJ , May 21, 2008

Thanks for your input. We will review some more budget oriented products including speakers and receivers. And certainly, we will talk about how to build a good vinyl setup without breaking the bank. Something like $500 for the turntable and $400 for the cartridge.

Affordable Speakers
written by JSK , May 22, 2008

Thanks. I look foward to the Reviews / articles!

...
written by mattburk , May 26, 2008

I love the logans. I would love to see a tower shoot out with these against the internet brands.

Comparison with Summit?
written by Mark C , May 26, 2008


Do you know how this speaker compares to the Summit? Is the only difference the bass module, or are the stators also different?

I have a 14 year old pair of ML Quests and a very large room and the only real deaw back is their inability to really drive the room. Can these newer stats truly play loud? The self protection on my Quests usually cuts in before they get quite as loud as I occasinally (not very often, but a few times per year) wish.

Thanks for the review.


Spire versus Vantage?
written by Joel Schnur , July 09, 2008

The Vanatage seems very close toe spire-what are the differecens?

...
written by JEJ , July 12, 2008

The Vantage is a few inches shorter than the Spire and has an 8" woofer compared to the 10" in the Spire.

where's the real comparison?
written by scape , July 30, 2008

not to point out the obvious, but where is the comparison of these to similar priced box builds? i feel this was a great review except for the fact that there is no reference to any tower or bookshelf/sub combo.

...
written by JEJ , July 30, 2008

Compared to box enclosure speakers, the Spires are more transparent and open, less directional, because they are dipoles and there is no coloration due to resonance that you get with an enclosure.

Martin Logan Spires versus PBN Montana EPS2
written by WCH , September 23, 2008

I know the clarity on the MLs would surpass the conventional
Montanas, but how about the dynamics, soundstage, and the ability to excel with all types of music. If one prefers rock,
pop, blues, and jazz, any preference?



...
written by JEJ , September 27, 2008

ESLs have a wonderful soundstage, clarity, and transparency, but their limitation is an ability to play really loud. The membrane can only move back and forth a small distance. If you like ESLs, it is best to get the biggest one you can afford, because the membrane surface area is larger, therefore, can move more air, and therefore, is less limited in loudness capability.

Differences between speakers
written by Greg , October 11, 2008

Hi John,

Thank you for your great review of the Spire. Martin Logans sound so awesome and I'm close to getting my first pair.

The dealer that I've been talking to recommends the Spires over the Summits and Vantages for several reasons. To further answer Joel's question about the difference between Vantages and Spires, I'd like to say that Spires have the same size electrostatic panel as the Summit. They are wider than those of the Vantage. The difference between larger and smaller Martin Logan electrostat panels lead to a difference in the size of the sweet spot when listening. The smaller speakers have less sweet spot so they only sound good when you're close to the center of the sound stage.

Also, similar to the Summit, the bass cabinet is not ported on the Spire, while they are ported on the Vantage. The bass sounds more accurate when the speaker is not ported. Additionally, the crossover for the Spire is that of the CLX generation.

The dealer describes the Spires as having a faster bass than the Vantages and even a Decent i.

The lowest prices I've been able to find for new Spires is $4,350 delivered. I've found Vantages new for $3,300 delivered, used for $1,500.

The cost really adds up because I'd also like to get a Descent i and a Stage center channel.

Well, that's where I'm at and thanks again for the help making my decision of which speaker to buy.

Greg


Spires versus Montana EPS2
written by WCH , October 22, 2008

I have owned Montana speakers for 11 years now and for the past 15 months, the EPS2s. I also just bought a pair of Martin Logan Spires 3 weeks ago. Here are my thoughts: The Spires
are very detailed, clear and sound great on well recorded
music, particularly jazz, acoustic, some rock, but there
seems to be a harshness on electronic rock, pop, older
recordings. I have to turn the volume down or i experience
listener fatigue. I never experience that with the Montana
EPS2s. They are so smooth and relaxing. You can play them loud, but they still sound great and dynamic at low volume.
My electronics are Musical Fidelity A5 integrated and A5
CD player, Rotel 1084 HD radio. My speaker cable is Audioquest Bedrock. I just switched to an Audio Magic speaker cable and that helped a little i think, but
overall i have to give the nod to the Montanas. Maybe
i'll change my opinion as the MLs break in some more,
but i won't be selling my Montanas....The MLs are beautiful
speakers and i really want to like them...they sound extraordinary on "Ian Anderson Plays the Orchestral Jethro
Tull" (really great on the Montanas too). My next step
is to borrow an amp from the dealer to try and tame that harshness. Hope it works....




Write comment
 

busy

 
Paradigm
Magazine Web Design - M Digital Design Solutions for Publishers