Q&A - #8 -
April 15, 1997
Q After
reading your article on the Accessible 1.0, I decided I would
like to use this construction technique on my current speaker
project. I am confused about one aspect though. How do you get
those rounded corners? I understand that you miter the top/bottom
and side moldings for the front and then cut 3/8" Vs down
the top & bottom of the sides. But after you install the
3/8" quarter round, the edges would stick out of the front
and back at the corners.
A You're correct in stating that the front and
back molding around the sides/top/bottom are mitered. However,
the four front-to-back pieces of 3/8" molding are not
mitered, rather, made flush with mitered pieces. These flush
pieces of molding may be installed once the front and back
mitered pieces are in place. This makes for an easy measurement
of the flush molding. Attached are two photos that show a
close-up view of the joints in question [click here for
photo # 1] [click here for
photo # 2].
Q Whatever
happened to Linn equipment and why don't I hear much about it
anymore? My friend has a Linn turntable, CD player and speakers
as well as a Linn multiple preamp and amp setup. He told me that
I should get Linn products, but I found that I couldn't find
anyone here or even in some bigger centers that carry Linn! Is
Linn dead? Also, would a Denon amped and component system coupled
with Audio Control crossovers and Mirage Speakers/Subs even
compare to my buddies aging but EXPENSIVE system?
A From your E-Mail address, you live in Canada.
You can locate Linn dealers in Canada by going to http://www.linn.co.uk/dealers/datacan.html. As far as the Denon equipment goes, in a
random group of people, some would find the Denon to sound
better, sound the same, or not sound as good as the Linn. Depends
on your tastes and perception. Denon makes good products, and
with a pair of AudioControl 30 band equalizers, you could
probably fine tune the system to make it sound very much to your
tastes. But, if you really like the sound of the Linn, then get
Linn. That is what hifi enjoyment is all about . . . getting what
you like.
Q I
am buying a Bose speaker system which as 7 speakers which take
about 10- 100 watts to drive. Shopping for a receiver for this
and want to spend not more than $300.00. Do you have any
suggestions? What features should I be looking for?
A In that price range, we found the following two
Pro Logic receivers to be of suitable build quality: Denon
AVR-600 at $299 (street price), and Yamaha RX-V490 at $349
(street price). Features we always check for in receivers these
days include 5.1 input capability (for connecting outboard AC-3
and DTS decoders), pre-outs, pre-ins (for adding more powerful
amplifiers), and speaker binding posts (as opposed to the spring
clips). But you have to go to the > $800 price range to find
them.
Q I
want to upgrade my home theater to AC-3 and in the process
greatly upgrade the sound quality. I presently have an Adcom
GTP-600. I've been looking at the Lexicon and Meridian
processors. Neither of them have a built in AC-3 demodulator.
I've been told that they are too noisy to integrate. Do you share
this opinion? Also, can you suggest a processor/preamp with a
built in demod?
A Outboard AC-3 demodulation is popular because it
is desirable to keep the RF from the laserdisc player away from
sensitive preamplifier circuitry. However, some manufacturers
integrate AC-3 demodulation into the main chassis without
apparent problems. Personally, I prefer to have the RF away from
the preamp circuits. With DVD you don't need RF demodulation,
since the AC-3 signal is a digital bistream coming out of the
player. Most of the mass consumer products that have AC-3 built
in, don't have a set of 5.1 discrete inputs, and therefore,
cannot accommodate DTS. Once you have heard DTS, I am sure you
will want it, so I would not recommend getting any preamp or
receiver that does not have this capability. Stacey Spears uses
Meridian, Daniel Long uses Lexicon, and we use the Yamaha RX-V990
here in the test lab, to have a spread of products. All of these
will allow AC-3 and DTS. The Meridian and Lexicon are designed to
be used with their own AC-3 and DTS upgrades (outboard
demodulation), while the Yamaha can be used with any brand of
outboard decoders. The new Theta Casablanca has it all, but is
very expensive. On a modest budget, I would suggest getting
something like the Yamaha RX-V2090 or 990, the Yamaha DDP-2 AC-3
outboard decoder, the Millennium DTS outboard decoder (reviewed
this week), and a 5 channel power amplifier.
Q I'm
looking for a reasonably priced ($500-750) CD changer. It must
have digital outs (I will connect it to Lexicon DC-1), preferably
both coax and Toslink, and it must have a headphone jack (my wife
insists). Any thoughts?
A The following two CD changers (multiple CDs) are
suitable: Sony CDP-CA8ES at $529 (street price), and Yamaha
CDC-845 at $449 (street price). These have Toslink digital out
(no coax digital out), but they do have the headphone jack.
Q I
would like some advice on the placement of my rear surround
speakers. My room is 12 X 22 and the sofa is along the 22 ft
dimension and it is right against the back wall. Should the
speakers be mounted on the back or side walls and at what angle?
Also what is the recommended distance between the front left and
right speakers?
A You have a number of choices, but first, try
putting the rear surround speakers in the corners, about three
feet above ear height (when you are sitting on the couch),
pointing downward towards your ears. If that does not suit you,
put them along the side walls, or on end tables closer to the
couch. This will reduce boominess. Estimating that your viewing
distance is about 8 - 10 feet, I would suggest a front left/right
speaker separation of about 6 feet. Playing music CDs in Pro
Logic would allow you to put the front speakers farther apart
than that with the center channel filling in the
"hole", but the problem is that, with movies, some
sound effects are designed to go with action occurring at the
edge of the picture, and if the front speakers are too far apart,
the sound effect won't align with the action properly.
Q I
was wondering if you have happened to have any direct experience
with the Lexicon DC-1 and possible amplifiers that have
complemented the Lexicon? I was thinking along the lines of
either a 5-6channel amp, or, a 2,3 combination. They will be
running a pair of NHT's 1.5 x 5.
A I have used the Lexicon (Daniel Long) with my
current system amps, and I think the neat thing about the DC-1
(or for that matter any line-level-only surround processor) is
that they really let you choose the amplifiers according to the
speakers you want to use. The DC-1 is very, very transparent in
music-only modes, especially if you use the (any one of the 8)
built-in DACs (of course you can bypass them if you already use a
very high-quality front-end, but bear in mind that if you choose
anything other than bypass, the DC-1 converts the input to
digital and works with it before doing a final DA conversion).
With movies, I must say I have never heard anything better, even
with non-discrete Dolby Pro Logic. And unlike on some processors
where the music surround modes are there just so the manufacturer
can give you a thicker instruction manual, those on the DC-1
really work. It is subtle yet manages to immerse you in the
music; instruments are very faithfully reproduced (very important
to me) and vocals are real.
Just this last Saturday, I heard the DC-1 with the AC-3
embellishments and it BLEW me away..... The disc I viewed was ID4
and the muy expensivo Vidikron helped but the sound was
incredible! There was none of that foley effect appearing in the
left-channel-right-channel-rear-channel and distracting from the
movie! It was like I was there! I believe the upgrade to AC-3
involves a chip, a card and an outboard de-modulator.
For NHT 1.5s, I think you should look at a good but
no-need-to-be-expensive 5 - 6 channel amp. My personal favourite
is the ATI (Amplifier Technologies, Inc) AT1506 (they also make
the AT1504 and AT1502 which are 4 and 2 channel amps
respectively) which put out 150W into 8ohms (225 into 4 and 450W
bridged into 8). Very clean and powerful for 150W and very, very
musical. I hear them often at a hangout of mine playing into
Chapmans (the big one with the transmission line loaded bass).
The Parasound HCA-1206, the Sunfire Cinema Grand, or the Bryston
5B ST or 8B ST are all good for the money.
Q Re
the Velodyne F1800IIR, I purchased a F1500 last year, a F1800
this Saturday. WOW what a difference! I find the 1800 to be the
8-ton Subwoofer From Hell, the 1500 to be just a close runner-up.
Both were purchased blind (no demo at dealer) after your
published evaluation (and others as well).
After searching through such literature as I could get my hands
on, reviews of subwoofers had little to say re one vs.two.
Further, no review seems to take the laws of physics in hand or
advertisers to task. Can a 10" speaker be judged to generate
long wavelengths at 100db at 1% distortion? Yet anyone can mfr
such and call it such regardless.
For the first time, I can now hear in my own living room the low
end of the pipe organ. But this high amplitude LF stuff reveals a
problem with my equipment or with the F1800. Too much gain (3 or
4 dots on the Velodyne) and too much LF content cause the
Velodyne to "kick" or "POP". The Theta/C-J
premiere 10 seem to pass all LF without much attenuation. No help
from dealer or Velodyne sales. Dealer offered to replace unit, I
will try CD of G. Wright at dealer to duplicate problem before
asking for a replacement.
How to judge the *TRUE* gain setting for Sub-Bass?? Using the
Video Laser disk, ch.07, I may be setting the F1800 too high.
Judging by movie sound tracks and CD of pipe organ, definitly too
high.
Two subs are better than one!! True statement, *especially* with
the SYM#3 mentioned above. But movie soundtracks are a different
animal. Mostly one-note mono, one sub does well here. I must add
the F1800 doesn't give me as much a headache. I must also add I
now dislike a constant LF rumble added to soundtracks during film
shots of spaceships (Star Trek movie, and 2010). I simply shut
off the sub. Just TOOO MUCH!!
Problem with ground loop hum. Bought a bagged pair of AC adapters
at Home Depot for less than a dollar to fix. Severe hum further
added to pop and kick problem. Velodyne sales suggested same fix.
Don't you experience these problems during your evaluations? You
don't mention any problems at all!!
What to do with the F1500? Keep it or sell it and purchase a
second F1800? I like the idea of the latter. Will think about it
- cost vs. actual need. Don't need subs for TV viewing, most
sound tracks are toooo much, only a few CDs blossom.
A The Velodyne has protective circuitry that kicks
in when the amp is driven too hard. Also, the servo-feedback
attenuates the output a bit, and since distortion is reduced,
there is a tendency to turn up the volume. A 10" driver can
produce those low frequencies, but a very long-throw voice coil
is required. Actually, very low distortion can result here,
because the 10" drivers are easier to keep under control
than the large 15" - 18" drivers. This is what we found
with the Mirage BPSS-210 which uses two 10" drivers in
biploar fashion. It is astonishingly clean. However, the large
drivers can generate much higher SPL at the really low
frequenciece, such as 15 Hz. We have not experienced many hum
problems, because we use AC line conditioners into which we plug
all the equipment. This keeps the ground potential the same for
all the components. I would suggest that you keep the F-1500, and
get another F-1800. Use the 1800s for the front left/right and
the 1500 for the subwoofer output (or LFE). An alternate plan
would be to get another 1500 and use the 1800 for the LFE.
Multiple subs are fantastic. We use four right now, and will be
going to six! The setup will be as follows: two F-1800s for the
front left/right, one Mirage BPSS-210 for the center, one M&K
MX-5000 for the LFE, and two F-1500s for the rear left/right. At
first glance, this may appear to be ridiculous. Even though we
need a sub in each channel for testing digital surround sound
processors (AC-3 and DTS are full range {10 Hz - 20 kHz} in 5 of
the 5.1 channels), there is another reason to have them. What
happens is this: each sub is turned up to only a small fraction
of its potential, so they are in the very low distortion part of
their performance curve. The result of multiple subs is a low end
that is beyond belief. The entire building shudders, but no buzz,
no rattle, just clean deep bass.
Q I
have been looking to upgrade/update my old phase linear amp. I
originally was looking at the Sunfire Cinema Grand but was told
it wasn't all it was said to be. I was turned on to the Aragon
8008 with dual mono blocks, and also looked at the Acurus 100x3
with the Acurus 150x2. I realize that the Aragon is much more
expensive than the Acurus and the Sunfire. How do these three amp
compare? Is the Aragon worth the extra expense - it sure sounded
great!! I am also a little unsure what the mono block is all
about - is it a must for high end hi-fi? Thanks for your input,
and what do you think for a new amp (any of the above or any
other)?
A The Aragon 8008ST and 8008BB both double their
output into 4 Ohms compared to 8 Ohms, indicating massive power
supplies, and the Acurus increases its output about a third when
the impedance is halved, a manifestation of a less robust power
supply (notwithstanding the quality of sound within its power
supply limitations). The Sunfire doubles its output into 4 Ohms,
like the Aragon. The Aragon and Acurus run in Class A/B, and the
Sunfire in Class D/H. The huge power supply of the Aragon is
partly responsible for its higher price (the D/H class of the
Sunfire allows it to double its output into 4 Ohms, even though
the power supply is not extremely large in physical size). As far
as the Sunfire not being all it is cracked up to be, all amps
have their critics, including the Aragon. If everyone had the
same opinion, there wouldn't be any need for more than one audio
magazine. What is most important is how the amps sound to you,
and what you can afford. Obviously, there has to be a balance
here. If you really like the sound of the Aragon, then go get
'em! Each monoblock has its own power supply, which is
advantageous during periods of high current demand in multiple
channels simultaneously. (The Aragon 8008BB has its monoblocks
inside one chassis, while some other designs put each monoblock
in a separate chassis.)
Q I
just found your web site about a month ago, and I wanted to tell
you that I have learned more from reading the information here
than I have from years of other audio and video magazines. I hope
things are going well for you and wish you the best for the
future. Fabulous e-zine! Best audio-video publication anywhere,
electronic or otherwise. Please become a permanent fixture on the
web.
A Thank you for the compliments. Everything is
going better than expected, and we do plan to continue, forever,
we hope!
© Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997
Secrets of Home Theater & High Fidelity
Return to Table of Contents for this Issue.