|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Q I have read your reviews of the Dynaudio Contour 1.1 and 1.3MK11
bookshelf speakers, thanking you Arvind. I am about to purchase the Dynaudio
Audience 42W (rears), Audience 122 (centre), and the Sub20A. Also the preamp, a
Rotel RSP-976, and the power amp RMB-1075. As for my front speakers, I don't
know whether to go for the 1.1s or 1.3s. My dilemma is my room size which is 13'
by 13' by 9'. I am concerned the 1.3MK11 needs a lot more room that I can
provide them with. Are the 1.1s a safer option, or are the 1.3s a better option
and worth the extra money? Are there any changes I need to make to the other
products I have mentioned? Would I need to purchase a Contour centre speaker so
it tonally matches either the 1.1s or 1.3s? I am guessing that your budget may get stretched with five Contour speakers, in which case go with the Audience line all around. My findings on the two Contour line models that I reviewed were that they were very neutral and could handle very high SPLs. However, they do not show you their best unless they are played at moderate to high levels. If you do a lot of listening at low to moderate levels, then you may miss what these speakers really have to offer. I am not sure if the same holds true for the Audience line, but it is something to look for in your auditions. My personal take on audio systems, is that I would rather spend most of my audio dollars on my main two-channel system. However, if the HT has to double as a two-channel music system as well then I would follow an approach similar to yours. In that case I would suggest that at least the front three speakers should be similar. In conclusion, if you have a separate two-hannel audio only system, then consider four Audience 42 + Audience 42C, depending on your budget. If your HT does double duty, then consider two 1.3MKII + Contour Center. The rears would depend on your budget, but I would recommend the 1.3MKII if you can swing it. T Q Does 24/96 give a better sound in the audible range, i.e., lower THD, or does it just give an extended frequency response to 48 kHz? A The sampling rate should not affect THD, but there could be distortion differences if the DAC is not linear. The quality of the output stage (op-amp) could definitely make a difference, since it would have to be of higher quality to pass the 48 kHz analog from a 24/96 DAC, compared to 22 kHz analog from a 16/44 DAC. The bit depth (16 bits vs. 24 bits) affects the noise floor. T
Q I have an RCA RT2500 home
theater system, with each channel rated at 100 watts at 6 ohms impedance. I was
wanting to replace the small front speakers that came with it with floor
speakers and I have had trouble finding 6 ohm speakers so I was wondering if I
can use 8 ohm speakers and how many watts they should be rated at. Also, if I
can use 8 T
Q Would you expect something
to blow out on an AV amplifier if it is turned on with nothing (no speakers or
inputs) connected to it? This happened to me when we turned it on to look at the
display. T
Q In positioning dipole surround speakers, I have
heard that they should be placed to the sides of the listening area, not behind
it as one might do for direct radiating speakers. T
Q I want (no, I need-I
have a small room) a flat screen TV/Monitor. I'm concerned about the burn in and
elevation issues with plasma. I'm starting to think that LCD might be the way to
go. Do they compare with plasma screens? T
Q I have been giving a lot of thought to
purchasing one of the "universal" players that have DVD-A and SACD capability.
Are these viable formats? It seems that due to numerous problems from the start,
the formats are doomed to failure. Help T
Q What is the difference in sensitivity of a
speaker, with its impedance remaining constant, when you drive it with a low
power amplifier vs. a high power amplifier?
|