<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Blog &#8211; John E. Johnson, Jr. &#8211; March 24, 2008: HIGH DEFINITION TV PROGRAMMING GONE WILD.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/press/home-theater-news/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/press/home-theater-news/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/</link>
	<description>Secrets of Home Theater and Hi Fi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Leroy Tirebiter</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/press/home-theater-news/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>George Leroy Tirebiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/03/24/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/#comment-525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still haven&#039;t entirely forgiven Warner&#039;s for putting the last nail in the coffin of HD-DVD, but I have to admit that their reissues are superb.  The HD-DVD of Casablanca was beautiful and set the standard for extra features.  Even the SD version of Strangers on a Train was excellent.  It put to shame even some Criterion Collection reissues I have seen recently, and these have a deserved reputation for quality.  I&#039;d pay a significant upcharge for a TCM in HD, but I guess there aren&#039;t enough of us to make this viable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still haven&#8217;t entirely forgiven Warner&#8217;s for putting the last nail in the coffin of HD-DVD, but I have to admit that their reissues are superb.  The HD-DVD of Casablanca was beautiful and set the standard for extra features.  Even the SD version of Strangers on a Train was excellent.  It put to shame even some Criterion Collection reissues I have seen recently, and these have a deserved reputation for quality.  I&#8217;d pay a significant upcharge for a TCM in HD, but I guess there aren&#8217;t enough of us to make this viable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ender21</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/press/home-theater-news/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>ender21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/03/24/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/#comment-489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only practical reason I could suppose is summed up as: quality.  Besides being an ISF Calibrator and HT consultant, my full-time occupation is in digital post-production.  In addition to new releases, we&#039;ve worked on many digital restorations... Bladerunner, Oklahoma, South Pacific, The Alamo, and the upcoming Baraka BD release (screened it last night and it looked FANTASTIC).  There are rumors of a full-blown, 65mm-sourced digital restoration for Lawrence as well (though that won&#039;t preclude a BD release from earlier transfers)...

If I&#039;m one of the rights-holders for any of the &quot;great old movies,&quot; do I spring for the time-consuming and more expensive task of restoring my great old movie or opt for the easy way out by telecineing a faded piece of film, complete with whatever blemishes it contains, and hope that a quick and dirty clean-up process makes things &quot;good enough?&quot;  Even the easy method can be painstaking and time consuming.

As a purist who gets to see just how good the Sound of Music, Bladerunner, or Baraka looks sourced at high resolution and then cleaned up properly, I say it&#039;s worth the wait.  If the effort is going to be lackluster at best and they&#039;re *still* dragging their feet on releasing them, then shame on them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only practical reason I could suppose is summed up as: quality.  Besides being an ISF Calibrator and HT consultant, my full-time occupation is in digital post-production.  In addition to new releases, we&#8217;ve worked on many digital restorations&#8230; Bladerunner, Oklahoma, South Pacific, The Alamo, and the upcoming Baraka BD release (screened it last night and it looked FANTASTIC).  There are rumors of a full-blown, 65mm-sourced digital restoration for Lawrence as well (though that won&#8217;t preclude a BD release from earlier transfers)&#8230;</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m one of the rights-holders for any of the &#8220;great old movies,&#8221; do I spring for the time-consuming and more expensive task of restoring my great old movie or opt for the easy way out by telecineing a faded piece of film, complete with whatever blemishes it contains, and hope that a quick and dirty clean-up process makes things &#8220;good enough?&#8221;  Even the easy method can be painstaking and time consuming.</p>
<p>As a purist who gets to see just how good the Sound of Music, Bladerunner, or Baraka looks sourced at high resolution and then cleaned up properly, I say it&#8217;s worth the wait.  If the effort is going to be lackluster at best and they&#8217;re *still* dragging their feet on releasing them, then shame on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ovation</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/press/home-theater-news/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>ovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/03/24/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-march-24-2008-high-definition-tv-programming-gone-wild/#comment-467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;marketing geniuses&quot; who decide what to release are all 17 years old and think only their great grandmas would watch a film made before 1995 (unless it&#039;s a cheesy sci-fi/horror flick that can be made fun of) and they prioritize schlock--either that or a collection of drooling gibbons is let loose in the film vaults and they just convert whatever random titles emerge.

Warner has done a better job than any other (they do have the biggest catalogue)--of the 50 or so HD DVD titles I have, about 40 are Warner titles and they include Casablanca, The Searchers, Bullitt, Grand Prix, Mutiny on the Bounty (1962), The Adventures of Robin Hood, 2001--A Space Odyssey--though I still await Lawrence of Arabia, Ben-Hur, North By Northwest, Rear Window, To Catch a Thief (I&#039;m a bit of a Hitchcock fan, as you might have guessed) and many more with some impatience (in &quot;blu&quot;, of course, now the &quot;war&quot; is over).

The &quot;big&quot; catalogue titles will come--but the more obscure ones took over a decade to come to DVD (still no African Queen, for example--and that is simply criminal), so it will take time.  Meanwhile, I&#039;m sure the &quot;Chucky&quot; series will have had double releases in HDM before we see Bogie and Hepburn in SD, never mind Blu-ray.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;marketing geniuses&#8221; who decide what to release are all 17 years old and think only their great grandmas would watch a film made before 1995 (unless it&#8217;s a cheesy sci-fi/horror flick that can be made fun of) and they prioritize schlock&#8211;either that or a collection of drooling gibbons is let loose in the film vaults and they just convert whatever random titles emerge.</p>
<p>Warner has done a better job than any other (they do have the biggest catalogue)&#8211;of the 50 or so HD DVD titles I have, about 40 are Warner titles and they include Casablanca, The Searchers, Bullitt, Grand Prix, Mutiny on the Bounty (1962), The Adventures of Robin Hood, 2001&#8211;A Space Odyssey&#8211;though I still await Lawrence of Arabia, Ben-Hur, North By Northwest, Rear Window, To Catch a Thief (I&#8217;m a bit of a Hitchcock fan, as you might have guessed) and many more with some impatience (in &#8220;blu&#8221;, of course, now the &#8220;war&#8221; is over).</p>
<p>The &#8220;big&#8221; catalogue titles will come&#8211;but the more obscure ones took over a decade to come to DVD (still no African Queen, for example&#8211;and that is simply criminal), so it will take time.  Meanwhile, I&#8217;m sure the &#8220;Chucky&#8221; series will have had double releases in HDM before we see Bogie and Hepburn in SD, never mind Blu-ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
