Home arrow Reviews arrow Movie Renter's Guide - June, 2008
Movie Renter's Guide - June, 2008
Secrets Movie Reviews
E-mail
Written by John E. Johnson, Jr.   
Sunday, 01 June 2008
Article Table of Contents
Classic War Films (Blu-ray)
The Eye (Blu-ray)
Jumper (Blu-ray)
Bella (SD DVD)
Witless Protection (Blu-ray)
Step into Liquid (Blu-ray)
Meet the Spartans (Blu-ray)
The Spiderwick Chronicles (Blu-ray)
Weeds, Season 3 (Blu-ray)
Chipmunks TV Shows (SD DVD)
Gangs of New York (Blu-ray)
National Treasure 2: Book of Secrets (Blu-ray)

"National Treasure 2: Book of Secrets" (Blu-ray)

movie-national-treasure-2.jpgSynopsis

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, apparently there was a missing page that had been torn out of his diary by Thomas Gates (Gretsch), who had met the assassin. In that page, Gates' name was mentioned.

A century and a half later, Mitch Wilkinson (Harris) shows up at a lecture that Ben Gates (Cage) is giving, and shows everyone the missing page of the diary, implicating Ben's great great grandfather in Lincoln's death. 

Of course, Ben and his father Patrick (Voight) know that they must clear the family name, and in examining the missing page, they find some hidden code that may be clues to a city of gold.

They discover that the President of the United States has access to a book of secrets, one that all past presidents have known about, and some of these secrets are additional clues to the whereabouts of the gold.

So, off to various places around the world, including the Royal Palace in London, looking for further clues to the treasure, with Wilkinson hot on their trail. He wants to be the first to find the treasure, and clear his own family's name in the process.

Finally, they locate the treasure in a famous US park, and Ben and Mitch battle it out to be the first through the door.

Specifications

  • Disney
  • 2007, Color, Rated PG, 2 Hr 4 min
  • Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
  • 1080p
  • Codec: Not Specified
  • English DD 5.1, English Dolby TrueHD
  • Directed by Jon Turteltaub
  • Starring Nicolas Cage, Justin Bartha, Diane Kruger, Ed Harris, Jon Voight, Bruce Greenwood, Helen Mirren, Joel Gretsch 
  •  
    Rating
  • Entertainment:
  • Video:
  • Audio:
  • Extras:
  • Violence: Mild
  • Sex: No
  • Language: No

Commentary

Well, I'm sorry to say that this one is a pretty poor excuse for a sequel. The budget was there, but everyone just seemed to be going through the motions of shooting film. I didn't see any real enthusiasm. That, to me, is the director's fault. It is his responsibility to instill a sense of purpose and excitement in the movie-making process.

Technical

Excellent image quality. Too bad the story didn't match the picture.

Extras

These include deleted scenes, director's commentary, behind the scenes, and other things.

Comments (5)add comment
not bothered by DNR in Patton and TLD?
written by Ovation , June 03, 2008

Just curious. I've come across a few reviews of these films and both TLD and Patton have been singled out for criticism as having had too much DNR applied (natural film grain is gone and high frequency information is scrubbed out along with it--the result is a hyper-clean image but not a film-like one). That is according to the reviews. They are in the minority, however, as most reviews have praised the look of these releases. I'm just wondering if the critics are being unrealistic in their expectations or if the general public prefers "hyper-clean" to "film-like". Incidentally, one of the critics (who still recommends the films as they are good, but finds they are not "film-like" in their presentation) is Robert A. Harris--a noted film preservationist who helped restore, among others, Spartacus and Lawrence of Arabia.

Thoughts?


...
written by JEJ , June 03, 2008

Film grain is not visible in Patton because the movie was shot in 70mm, which means the film space was much larger than a movie shot on the standard 35mm film space. It has a super clean look to it because it is super clean in the first place. That is the advantage of 70mm. I am surprised the film critics made that error. If they want film grain so that it looks "film like", maybe they should watch movies shot on 16mm film. They will see film grain galore. As to The Longest Day, I was more cognizant of the excessive contrast in some scenes than any "scrubbing". Film grain depends on the ISO of the film itself, and TLD may have used fine grain black & white film.

...
written by HD , June 11, 2008

"Film grain is not visible in Patton..."
But it should be. Here you can see the master frame and what cleanup it underwent...
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=14042247#post14042247


...
written by JEJ , June 11, 2008

I was able to pretty much duplicate the "master frame" by doing a screen copy of the Blu-ray screen shot shown by the other reader and then simply applying some sharpening and random noise. In other words, I was able to take the screen shot and go back to the "master frame". I can send it to you for posting at AVS if you like. I am not a member. Perhaps someone is just playing a little joke there. In any case, I think that fine film grain from a 70mm movie is probably beyond the resolution of 1920x1080 high def TV.

...
written by HD , June 12, 2008

I'm not sure where the "master frame" came from in the AVS post. I don't think it is a mock-up.
But I know the poster is a Microsoft insider and he also showed here how adding random noise can improve perceived sharpness
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=13912316&highlight=xylon#post13912316
And here he offered a writeup about dither/random noise
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=960826



Write comment
 

busy

 
Paradigm
Magazine Web Design - M Digital Design Solutions for Publishers