Media Servers
Qsonix Q110 Media Server
|
Qsonix Q110 Media Server A Secrets Media Server Review |
|
| Written by John E. Johnson, Jr. | |||||
| Sunday, 03 February 2008 | |||||
Page 3 of 3
In Use I connected the Q110 to two systems. One (Zone 1) used the digital coaxial output which went to the digital input on my Lexicon MC12B SSP, connected to McIntosh power amplifiers and Carver Amazing Mark IV ribbon speakers, while the second system (Zone 2) used an RCA stereo analog output pair that I connected to an Onix H6550 integrated amplifier and Onix Strata Mini speakers. Cables were Legenburg and Nordost. The setup sounded excellent both through the coaxial digital output and the analog outputs. I am not a fan of using DSP to produce surround sound from two-channel music, so I simply listened to them the way they were coming off the server, in stereo. I had no complaints at all, except that it was so easy to add more music to the que, I got behind in my work sitting there for hours on end. Maybe that's not such a bad thing though. I didn't use the remote control that much because it was so much fun to drag and drop music with the touchscreen, but I suppose that novelty would eventually wear off. It would be nice to have four remotes, one for each zone, and each one an RF transmission with its own code so one could operate each zone from that room with a remote dedicated to that zone.
I am not going into waste space with a bunch of such statements like, "The second violins at 1 minute 34 seconds into track 6 of such and such an album had tremendous air," as you know that is not my style. What I was looking for here was a sound quality that was as good as I am used to with my own excellent CD players, and I got it. Enough said. At this time, the Q110 will not store SACD or DVD-A music discs, nor will it store movies. That is down the road. I would also like to see four Cat 6 digital outputs, one for each zone, so that digital signals could be carried to all the various rooms, some of which might be a hundred feet away. DACs would receive the signal, decode it, and send it on to the power amplifiers. At present, the unit is designed to sit next to a multi-channel power amplifier, and the speaker cables then will need to be very long in some cases. I didn't connect the power amplifiers to 50 foot speaker cables, but I am sure there would be some high frequency loss doing this. To help remedy the problem, be sure to use heavy speaker cables, such as 12 gauge, if they are really long. On the Bench At 1 kHz (signal recorded onto a CD at -5 dB and then the CD was uploaded to the Q110), THD+N was 0.06%. Notice also the absence of a 60 Hz peak and its harmonics. This indicates a very good power supply. At 10 kHz, THD+N was a bit higher, at 0.14%. Part of this is due to that peak outside of the audible band (an 80 kHz bandwidth is used to calculate the THD+N), but that peak could interact with audible frequencies. IMD, using 60 Hz and 2 kHz sine waves as test frequencies, was a very low 0.01%. Frequency response was 20 Hz - 20 kHz, + 0.3 dB. Conclusions I have to say that you had better put away some extra cash, because you will be purchasing new CDs to download from Music Giants and listening to more music than you ever have in your lifestyle before getting such a fun product like the Qsonix Q110. It's easy to set up. plays music in four places at the same time, and you will have no more excuses for not listening to that bursting collection of CDs that have been sitting around gathering dust for so long. Comments (10)
![]() Seems more like a music server, not a media server
written by smurphy5 , February 05, 2008 While I do agree that it seems nice where is the media part? Beyond music this does not ahndle anything else. Possibly any form of 1 type of media can now be called such, but in the past when these first came out they were called media servers only if they handled music and video. Perhaps the next version, a Q111 or 115 will handle high resolution music as well as VIDEO! It seem smore like an advanced (read: larger control panel and better ouotput capability) 3rd Gen 250gb Ipod. ...
written by JEJ , February 05, 2008 Music CDs are media and always have been. It is a media server, more specifically a music server, and I sure wish it were a movie server too. Hollywood paranoia is the only reason most media servers are only music servers right now. Hopefully, media servers of the near future will be true media servers, delivering all types of media. Save some money
written by Jeff Baker , February 06, 2008 I would say, if are at all technically inclined, get a PS3 with either a big hard drive such as the Ethernet Big disk by Lacie (includes Twonkymedia server) or get a cheap desktop computer and install Twonkymedia yourself. It is fast and painless. I have this setup and think that the interface is excellent and you also get a Blu-ray player and game system. The system will stream MPG videos from ripped DVD's and also home movies such as the AVCHD videos from my Panasonic HD camcorder. Interface is ugly
written by DJ , February 06, 2008 The interface looks horrible. I think a MythTV server that one can build would look ten time better. ...
written by JEJ , February 06, 2008 All interfaces need getting used to. I usually hate all program interfaces when I first boot them up. They are all different, and it is annoying to deal with the new buttons in new locations to click. But, the point is, this system works beautifully out of the box. No hassle, no errors, no crashes. Nothing but disc loading with complete success and listening to beautiful music. That will appeal to a lot of consumers who don't want to deal with things that are pieced together and have bugs. Waaay to expensive
written by Niclas , February 07, 2008 A good review but I'm missing comparisons, here in 2008 there's quite a few similar solutions that cost a fraction and seems better.. How about compare its functionality, ease of use, sound quality etc to Sonos or Logitech SqueezeBox (Duet?)? Sure, no storage, but wireless man, wireless! ;) ...
written by JEJ , February 08, 2008 Glad to know someone has advance information on the next iPod version. If it has the larger display and more connections, it will weigh in at about 40 pounds. Good luck selling them. Costs too much
written by EMA , February 08, 2008 Seems like for the price, you could BUY a laptop with a big external drive and use a wireless router and multiple Squeezeboxes to do the same (rip with EAC into flac which gets the CD information for you) for a MUCH lower price with MUCH more flexibility and is WIRELESS. Seems like a niche product. Could not be sold to Audiophiles on Audiogon for $3400 nuff said about value
written by EMA , February 20, 2008 http://cgi.audiogon.com/cgi-bi...1203458360 An outstanding product....
written by JSO , April 24, 2008 I understand everyone is entitled to an opinion, and it is very easy to be critical anonymously,, hence I felt compelled to respond to provide some "balance" to some of the above "comments." This is an excellent review of an outstanding product. I was skeptical myself about this type of product, my dealer let me "try before I buy" and I immediately sold my "high end" $6K cd player after using the Qsonix. It has completely re-energized my interest in 2-channel audio. Coupled with an excellent DAC, it sounded just as good as my Sim Audio Eclipse CD player in my dedicated, treated, 2-channel room,,,, and as a bonus it was fun to use. With regard to cost, yes, it is expensive, but so was my "high end" CD player. One could also purchase a $200 CD player and be happy (to each their own). If you want to drive a Saturn, then Drive a Saturn. For me, a BMW is a better ride. With regard to creating your own monster for less, one could cobble together a PC or a PS3 and make their own music server, but it would NOT equal the Qsonix in terms of audio fidelity (with a competent DAC), ease of use, UI and bullet proof operating system. And for "nuff said" comment, the dealer who advertises these sells numerous units per month, did you ever step back and think that the dealer uses auctions to promote direct sales????? Thank you JEJ for the insightful review, it was "dead on" And for those who are wondering, I have absolutely no affiliation with QSonix, its simply a great product. Write comment
|
|||||


















