<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Movie Renter's Guide - October, 2008</title>
		<description>Comments for Movie Renter's Guide - October, 2008 at http://www.hometheaterhifi.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:05:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Steve-O</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/media-music-movies-etc/43-movie-reviews/466-secrets-movie-reviews.html#comment-1169</link>
			<description>Differences of opinion aside, the new Indy film was a spectacular ride, very similar to Indy's other films. It deals with the paranormal, just like the others. I don't know why you though it sucked, but I totally agree with JEJ's assertion. - JLDoan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:27:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/media-music-movies-etc/43-movie-reviews/466-secrets-movie-reviews.html#comment-1138</link>
			<description>I don't generally consult Wikipedia about new movies. I guess I should have in the case of such a long series of sequels and remakes. Back in the time when Night of the Living Dead was released, we called them &quot;Schlock&quot; movies. Blood and guts, shot on a low budget. I do use IMDB, but info on previous versions and sequels was not on that site, although there is quite a list of films in the same genre and partially similar titles. Thanks for the suggestion though. I will consult Wikipedia from now on. - JEJ</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:49:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/media-music-movies-etc/43-movie-reviews/466-secrets-movie-reviews.html#comment-1137</link>
			<description>Movie reviews differ widely in all the places where they are reviewed. My reviews are only my opinion. - JEJ</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:45:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The dead confused</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/media-music-movies-etc/43-movie-reviews/466-secrets-movie-reviews.html#comment-1135</link>
			<description>The sequels to Romero's classic original &quot;Night of the Living Dead&quot; predate the movies reviewed here by a couple of decades.  The original &quot;Dawn of the Dead&quot; is from 1978 which was followed by &quot;Day of the Dead&quot; in 1985 and then the most recent installment (which is reviewed here) &quot;Land of the Dead&quot; in 2005.  The &quot;Dawn of the Dead&quot; that you are reviewing is a remake of the 1978 sequel.  While I wouldn't say that Romero's work is up there with &quot;Gone With the Wind&quot; or &quot;2001&quot; or &quot;Citizen Cane&quot;, it is certainly significant in the horror canon and as such should be treated with a bit more respect when doing a synopsis review.  A bit of fact checking by the writer or editor (it took me about 30 seconds to find the timeline on Wikipedia and IMDB) would be appreciated. - Dan Eickmeier</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:28:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>You must be joking</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/media-music-movies-etc/43-movie-reviews/466-secrets-movie-reviews.html#comment-1128</link>
			<description>The Indiana movie was bad.  In fact it didn't even hold up on an International United flight, when normally even lame movies seem like a treat compared to the attendants.  I love this site, but in movies you are sometimes way off.  You diss &quot;Lost In Translation&quot; and give this a 5?  Yes please, I will have what you're smoking! - Steve-0</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:24:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

