<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>NAD C565BEE CD Player</title>
		<description>Comments for NAD C565BEE CD Player at http://www.hometheaterhifi.com , comment 1 to 10 out of 10 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:29:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Ipod connectivity?</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-2411</link>
			<description>I bought this player and cannot connect an Ipod.  I think you must have generalized...maybe an mp3 player can be connected but not an actual ipod?  It says &quot;no usb&quot; when I connect my ipod.  Other than that, I really enjoy the player and it's upsampling capabilities! - Marc</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:57:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NAD/Rotel</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-2360</link>
			<description>The Rotel can be had on the street for under $500 (do your homework), but does not have the upconversion ability (but can play HDCDs) or a USB. The Rotel can only power up with its remote, if I recall. Rotels build quality is very good and cosmetics are excellent compared to the NAD. The Wolfsons have more processing power than the Burr Browns in the Rotel, but sonically, the Rotel is a great 2 channel performer. Both would be good choices, but you will need to audition them and decide what best meets your needs.  - JM7043</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:16:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NAD vs Rotel</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-2357</link>
			<description>Jim,
How would you compare this player against Rotel 1072?
I am torn between these two. - jaybee</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:45:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>An able cable....</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-2326</link>
			<description>eric- I used a Zu Oxyfuel coaxial for a digital connection and my Kimber PBJ's to evaluate the analog output. If you want to hear the NAD DACs, you'll want to use the analog outs. Bring your favorite music...stuff that you are very familiar with...and enjoy! I think you will like the NAD. - JM7043</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:42:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cables with NAD in article</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-2325</link>
			<description>I am going to audition this player this weekend, I am going to bring my Purist Aqueous cable with me (a $900.00 IC)! What cable did you use for the demo? I am betting my cable will make this player sing!!!  Do you feel it will respond well to high-end cables?  - eric</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:28:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comparison...</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-1989</link>
			<description>Jerry, I have not auditioned the SA8003, but have no doubt that it sounds great. If you are into SACD, that would be a good choic. But if your preference is making your CD collection sound its very best, I would recommend the C685BEE and use its SRC feature. The only reason I did not hold onto the NAD was my large collection of SACD/DVD-A that I have. This will probably be your deciding factor, too. Are the CL chips better than the WM chips? You'd have to listen and compare them side-by-side. - Jim</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comparisons</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-1988</link>
			<description>Jim,
Great review. Any thought on how this player may compare to the Marantz SA8003? They seem very similar.
Thanks. - Jerry</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:04:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DAC in question....Rev. 1.1</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-1983</link>
			<description>SteveD- The official word from NAD is that the DAC they used in the C565BEE is the WM8741.  - Jim</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:54:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DACs</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-1982</link>
			<description>I will look into it more, but I think it uses the WM8740. - Jim</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:44:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DACs</title>
			<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cd-players/646-nad-c565bee-compact-disc-player.html#comment-1974</link>
			<description>Which specific Wolfson DACs are being used by the player?

Thanks. - SteveD</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:02:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
