You have selected a custom search.

You may have noticed that we have changed the look and feel of this latest shootout. If you have not yet read the Guide to the Progressive Scan Shootouts, then please do so before continuing. If you do not read the guide before hand, you may not understand the new system. We have also worked hard to move over the previous shootouts to the new look. You can now view all shootouts at once.

We also recommend you read the latest updates to Part 5 of the DVD Benchmark and the Chroma Upsampling Error.

The Test Results

   Pass    Borderline
   Fail    Not Tested

Player data table:

DVD Player Results
General Deinterlacing Core
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags Weight: 10, From DVD: WHQL, Film Mode 1 3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags Weight: 8, From DVD: WHQL, Film Mode 2 3-2 Cadence, Video Flags Weight: 7, From DVD: More Tales of the City 3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags Weight: 6, From DVD: WHQL, Chapter Break 1 and 2 2-2 Cadence, Film Flags Weight: 5, From DVD: Natural Splendors Chapter 6, Avia Zone Plate Film Mode High Detail Weight: 6, From DVD: Super Speedway Bad Edit Weight: 10, From DVD: Big Lebowski, Making-of Video to Film Transition Weight: 6, From DVD: WHQL, Mixed Mode 1 Recovery Time Weight: 6, From DVD: WHQL, Mixed Mode 1 Incorrect Progressive Flags Weight: 6, From DVD: Apollo 13, Making-of; Galaxy Quest Menu Motion Adaptive Weight: 10, From DVD: Video Essentials, Zone Plate; Sage Pendulum Sync Subtitle to Frames Weight: 2, From DVD: Abyss Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags Weight: 10, From DVD: Toy Story, Chapter 4 Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags Weight: 8, From DVD: Monsters, Inc. Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags Weight: 8, From DVD: Toy Story Main Menu. (3-disc set only) Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP Weight: 5, From DVD: More Tales of the City Video Levels Weight: 8, From DVD: Avia, Horizontal Gray Ramp Blacker-than-Black Weight: 7, From DVD: Video Essentials, PLUGE pattern YC Delay Weight: 10, From DVD: Video Essentials, Bowtie Image Cropping Weight: 4, From DVD: Avia, Pixel Cropping Pattern Layer Change Weight: 4, From DVD: WHQL, Title Roll Responsiveness Weight: 6, From DVD: Avia Menus
OPDV971H> Video 2 96 154.5
DVL1000F> Auto 2 94 151.754
OPDV971H> Video 1 93 154.5
DVL1000F> Auto 1 91 151.754
DVL1000F> Auto 2 88 151.754
DV-970HD> Default 86 5
DVP-NS75H> Default 85 .754.5
DV-970HD> Default 84 5
DVL1000F> Auto 1 84 151.754
Xbox 360> Default 84 .255
DVP-NS90V> Default 79 .54
SD-5980 (> Film 78 1.253
DN191H (C> Default 78 .13.5
SD-5980 (> Auto 78 1.253
DVP-NS75H> Default 78 .754.5
DVP5960 (> Default 78 .54.5
SD-K860 (> Default 77 .13.5
SD-K760 Default 77 .13.5
HD-850 (H> Default 76 .253
SD-5980 (> Auto 75 1.253.5
DV-588A Default 75 54.75
SD-5980 (> Film 75 1.253.5
DVD-RP62 Auto1 75 1531.753
DVP5960 (> Default 75 .54.5
DVD-RP62 Auto2 75 1531.753
SD-3960 Film 73 10.753.5
DVP-NS90V> Default 73 .54
DVD-HD755> Default 73 .24.5
SD-3960 Auto 73 15.753.5
HD-850 (C> Default 71 .253
DVD 4119 Default 71 1.53.5
Bravo D1> Default 70 51.52.5
DVD-HD755> Default 69 .24.5
DVP-NS775V Auto 69 5.754
DVP-NS775V Video 69 5.754
DN191H (H> Default 69 .13.5
SD-K860 (> Default 69 .13.5
SD-4960 Default 69 13.5
DV-563a Default 67 223.5
DVD-S52 (> Auto 1 67 1.54
SD-5980 (> Video 67 1.253
DV-490V-S> Default 67 .254.5
DV-393-S Default 67 .254.5
DVD-S52 (> Auto 2 65 1.54
DVD-515 Default 65 101.252
DVN-8100N Default 65 .254
DV-578a Default 64 54.5
DVD-S29 Auto 1 64 514
DVD-S29 Auto 2 63 514
SD-5980 (> Video 63 1.253.5
CH-DVD300S Default 63 51.52.5
DV-490V-S> Default 62 .254.5
XV-N420B Auto 59 5.252.5
TT-2600DVD Default 59 .14.5
XV-S60 Smart 59 254122.5
LVD-2001 480P 58 1.54.0
DVF-8100 Default 58 5.13
LVD-2001 720P 58 1.54.0
SD-6915 Default 57 101.252.5
DVDP-1500 Default 57 4.5
DWM-400 Default 57 5.754.5
Bravo D1> Default 57 51.52.5
DVP-642 Default 56 5.754
MDV458 Default 56 .15
DVP-NS575P Auto 55 4.5
DVP-NS575P Video 55 4.5
DVD-S52 (> Auto 1 53 1.54
DVD-1710 Default 52 522
DVD-S52 (> Auto 2 52 1.54
XV-N44SL Video > 51 12.5
SD-3960 Video 51 .753.5
XV-N44SL Film 50 12.5
XV-N44SL Auto 50 12.5
DVD-S52 (> Video 49 1.54
AD800 Default 49 255122.5
DVD-S27 Auto 1 48 1.253.5
DVD-S27 Auto 2 48 1.253.5
CH-DVD 500 Auto 46 30310.12
DRC232N Default 45 512.5
DVD-S29 Video 40 14
DVF-3080-S Default 40 3
DVB-412 Default 40 .23
DVD-S52 (> Video 36 1.54
XV-N44SL Video > 34 12.5
DD-6040 Default 32 523.5
DVD-S27 Video 31 1.253.5
SVP500 Default 21 1.53
Software DVD Player Results
General Deinterlacing Core
PowerDVD> hardwa> 67 1511.015
PowerDVD> softwa> 67 1411.015
WinDVD 3.0 Auto 65 2051.255
DVD 1.5 hardwa> 65 1545.015
WinDVD Pl> hardwa> 65 1541.015
WinDVD Pl> softwa> 65 1541.015
CinePlaye> softwa> 65 742.015
DVD 1.5 softwa> 65 741.015
WinDVD 20> Auto 65 1041.255
CinePlaye> hardwa> 65 1545.015
Windows M> Default 65 2031.015
PowerDVD> Auto 44 1451.255
Video Processor and Non DVD Player Results
General Deinterlacing Core
4.1.0 (43> Default 57 15


Notes on individual players:

Divider

Oppo Digital - OPDV971H

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: MT1389FE
Deinterlacer Maker: Genesis
Deinterlacer Model: FLI-2310
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.oppodigital.com

OPDV971H (DVI) - Video 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Recovery Time
Sync Subtitle to Frames

OPDV971H (DVI) - Video 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Recovery Time
Sync Subtitle to Frames
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

THIS IS AN UPDATE FROM A BENCHMARK REVIEW PUBLISHED IN THE SPRING OF 2005, BECAUSE THE PLAYER NOW HAS NEW FIRMWARE.

The 971H is the premier DVD player from a brand new company here in the US: Oppo Digital. The company is a spring off from the electronics giant, BBK Electronics. BBK has been in the business for a long time and is a world leader in the electronics field with total manufacturing output matching Sony and Matsushita. If the 971H is any indication, we have a lot to look forward to from Oppo Digital.

As you can see from the Benchmark scores, the 971H is an outstanding budget DVD player. But I must advise you that the scores only pertain to the DVI output. This player’s component outputs do not support progressive playback, only 480i, so we were not able to plot a video frequency response curve. I was quite surprised, because I’ve never seen this before. The DVI video board in the player houses the Genesis FLI-2310 video processing chip, so the component video connections cannot take advantage of it.

This is the second union of the FLI-2310 and a Mediatek MPEG decoder. Ever since I first tested the Mediatek chips, I’ve been hoping for their fusion with a high line de-interlacing solution. The first player that I tested with this was the Toshiba 593 DVD/VCR combo. Unfortunately, that player had inconsistent performance from unit to unit, and the implementations of the chips were not what they should have been. I left feedback with Toshiba on this, but they didn’t take advantage of the suggestions. When Oppo originally sent me their player, I found some problems that needed to be addressed, so I let them know, and they fixed them. I must say I was extremely impressed with how Oppo handled the issues I brought up, as well as the issues that I’ve seen raised on some of the Internet A/V forums. In fact, Oppo has been consistently releasing firmware updates since our original testing, and they added some new features to the player that would normally demand a whole new model from most manufacturers. This includes support for DVD-Audio playback, full control of the True Life features of the Faroudja video processing, and a brand new remote!

This player offers the standard upscaling resolutions of 480p, 720p and 1080i. The Faroudja chip seems to be set up appropriately, and they have updated the player to include processing for 2-2 based cadences with their Video 2 setting. This is a feature that is already implemented on newer players or is available as a simple firmware update for existing players. The Genesis chip has the same limitations as every other player using it. This includes somewhat sluggish transitions between film and video material and the unfortunate macroblocking issue. When I used my standard A Bug's Life test, the player did show signs of the macroblocking bug, but it isn’t as bad as some other players such as the Teac Esoteric UX-1 or Samsung HD-1000. This is really the only drawback I am finding with this player on my reference playback system.

The Mediatek chip is utilized to its fullest potential here. The player breezed through our chroma tests with no signs of banding or jaggies at all. The chip is also extremely fast with menu navigation and supports a seamless layer change.

Oppo has addressed the issues I found with the cross color suppressor being defaulted to "On" and now has an available setting for control. We always recommend that this setting be left off for normal DVD playback. On top of that, the TrueLife features of the Faroudja processing are now included. This is a sharpening filter of sorts that also offers some noise reduction features as well. Personally, I am not a big fan of these features, but it is nice to see Oppo include this kind of tweak ability to the end user.

Some of the bonus features of this player include excellent PAL support with PAL to NTSC conversion. The player also supports DiVX and MPEG-4 files. On the audio side, you’ll find an internal Dolby Pro Logic II decoder that can be used with the analog audio outputs. There is now full DVD-Audio support with bass management and time alignment.

Conclusions

If you are in the market for a budget DVD player, with a DVI output, and which has exceptional video performance, the 971H definitely meets these criteria. This player passes below-black, has no pixel cropping, and there are no signs of Y/C delay. I personally can’t wait to see what Oppo has in store for us next. Congratulations to Oppo Digital on making a great player even better!

Divider

Sylvania - DVL1000F

MPEG Maker: Unknown
MPEG Model: Unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Genesis
Deinterlacer Model: FLI-2310
   
MSRP: $89.99
Website: http://www.sylvania.com/ConsumerProducts/ConsumerElectronics/

DVL1000F (HDMI) - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time

DVL1000F (HDMI) - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

DVL1000F (Component) - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time
YC Delay

DVL1000F (Component) - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time
YC Delay
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

I don’t know about you but whenever I see the name Sylvania, the first thing I think of are light bulbs. But nowadays it seems like every manufacturer out there that has anything to do with consumer electronics is putting out a DVD player. Production costs on these things must be pennies for so many companies to be diving in.

The Sylvania DVL1000F is a pretty basic design. The case is larger than you would expect when you unbox it, but this thing is as light as a feather. I didn’t get to see what MPEG decoder they were using because the video board is actually upside down when you open it up and I wasn’t going to take it apart. They are using the Genesis FLI-2310 video processing chip though, which has Faroudja’s algorithms for de-interlacing and scaling. This chip always does well with our tests but brings some other problems to the table.

For those who don’t already know, the Genesis/Faroudja FLI-23xx series of chips have been around for quite awhile now. Genesis has already moved on to their new “Cortez” chip since this release, but it is still widely used in lower cost DVD players for de-interlacing and scaling. The problem with this chip is the random digital noise it adds to the image with some displays, especially in darker areas of the picture. It is very reminiscent of bad noise reduction that can’t be turned off and resembles large blocks of noise in darker regions. It is almost as if the player is doing some kind of retention of certain parts of the image at times. For anyone who has a display that shows this problem (some displays don’t have an issue with this for some reason), I always say steer clear. Even if you don’t see the problem right away, it will haunt you eventually. I have a $20,000 projector in my reference home theater room, and it shows the problem and makes players that use this chip a non-option for DVD playback. If you don’t know whether your TV will have this issue, make sure the retailer you buy the player from has a good return policy just in case.

Since I knew this player used the Faroudja chip for its video processing duties, I was very curious to see how it would do with our core video processing tests. I knew there probably wouldn’t be any surprises on the de-interlacing front, but you just never know how good or bad things can be when it comes to core video performance.

The 1000F did surprisingly well. The HDMI output does not clip head or toe room (a rarity in budget players) and didn’t have any issues with pixel cropping or Y/C delay. The MPEG decoder did fine in our CUE tests, and since they are using the Genesis chip, this player passes our 4:2:0 chroma test, which requires the use of a chroma filter. The component video output didn’t fare quite as well. It suffers from some rather severe Y/C delay, so you should stick to HDMI if you are considering this player. Out of curiosity I did some tests to see if this player's cross-color suppression function was appropriately turned off. This has been an issue with some other Faroudja-based players we’ve tested in the past. Thankfully, the Sylvania has this set to off, but I didn’t see anywhere in the menu to turn it on if you want to use it. This is a feature that is mainly geared towards video processors that may handle composite video signals which have chroma interference in the luma channels. I don’t think I’ve seen a DVD to date that needed this feature turned on.

The HDMI output supports resolutions up to 1080p but will not pass 480i. This is a limitation of the Genesis chip, which doesn’t have a pass through. While this is not a surprise, I would still like to see a manufacturer offer this option. It would allow the end user to bypass the Genesis processing and avoid the macroblocking artifacts associated with it. I guess you could get this result by using the component output at 480i, but then you would have to deal with the excessive Y/C delay. You just can’t win them all these days can you?

As expected, the 1000F did very well in our de-interlacing tests. The FLI-2310 always has, and Sylvania has appropriately included two modes for the chip. The FLI chip requires a separate mode to enable the 2-2 processing that it is capable of. The weird thing is this mode doesn’t seem to hurt any other processing, so I would suggest just putting the player in Auto 2 and leaving it there. This should deliver the best viewing experience regardless of the content you watch.

From a usability standpoint, the 1000F is pretty good, but I had a few nitpicks. The setup menu is very limited in what you can do. None of the features of the FLI chip are accessible, which may or may not be a big deal to the end user, but are always nice to have. Navigation is pretty fast, which is always nice, and chapter skips are very fast. The layer change was probably the worse part of the user experience and clocked in at a VERY sluggish 1.75 seconds. Any player that takes longer than a second for a layer change at this stage in the game is unacceptable in my book. Sad to see that a player that does so well in so many other areas has an issue like this.

Conclusions

In the Sylvania DVL1000F, we see yet again a design that is less than $100 but still does an extremely good job in video presentation and features. It is a shame to see that macroblocking is still an issue with the Genesis chip design, and I will continue to warn consumers that they should ensure that they buy a player using this chip from a retailer that has a good return policy as results can vary greatly depending on the display used. But if your display doesn’t have issues with FLI-23xx based players, this one is a steal for a spare player!

Video Frequency Response
Sylvania

Divider

Oppo Digital - DV-970HD

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: MT1389EE
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: MT1389EE
   
MSRP: $149.00
Website: http://www.oppodigital.com

DV-970HD (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

DV-970HD (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

Oppo Digital made a big name for themselves just awhile back with their first entry into the DVD player market: the 971H. That budget player was one of the first to combine a Mediatek MPEG decoder with the popular Faroudja FLI-2310 de-interlacing/scaling chip. What resulted was a player that had an outstanding core video section, excellent de-interlacing, and a great price. But the 971H had its issues. For one thing, it would only do de-interlacing and scaling via its DVI output, leaving component video users in the cold. The Faroudja-based video processing also has issues with some displays causing “macroblocking” artifacts that can make the playback of DVD near unwatchable depending on how bad the interaction between the display and player is. The DVI output is also an issue for some. DVI was originally intended for PC applications, so it is a bit limited in its overall capability. But for those who looked past these issues, the 971H was a steal. Now, Oppo Digital has released an even bigger steal, the DV-970HD. This new player incorporates even more features and flexibility, at an even lower price!

The 970HD is based on the popular Mediatek (MTK) MPEG decoder, just like its predecessor, but the implementation is different this time around. Oppo Digital has eliminated the Faroudja processing and is relying solely on the processing inside the MTK chip. While this does result in a hit in overall video de-interlacing performance, it eliminates the risk of macroblocking artifacts if your display is susceptible to those issues.

The changes don’t stop there. The 970HD doesn’t use a DVI output, but rather the new HDMI standard. This means you can output digital video AND audio. It also means you have choices for output color space and support for high-resolution audio via a single connector. And because HMDI supports 480i video signals (DVI is limited to 480p and up), the 970HD comes in as a very attractive digital transport for feeding an outboard video processor. The 970HD also adds support for progressive playback via the component outputs and SACD support, making it a true universal DVD player. This is without a doubt the most complete feature package I’ve seen from a player at $150. Universal players are normally twice that price at the low end.

Like the 971HD, there is a lot of support for extra features in the 970HD. On the video side, you’ll find support for DIVX, MPEG4, DVD-R, DVD-RW, and DVD Video. There is also smartcard and USB support on the front panel. On the audio side you’ll find support for MP3 and Windows Media Audio, along with both high-resolution audio formats: SACD and DVD Audio. The 970HD supports the new HDMI v1.1 specification, so DVD Audio’s high-resolution multi-channel PCM sound can be output digitally via HDMI. This is also the only player I’m aware of that allows SACD’s DSD sound format to be converted to high-resolution PCM (88.1kHz/24bit) and transmitted via HDMI as well! End users should be aware that your receivers or surround processors need to be HDMI v1.1 compliant as well to use this feature.

From a usability standpoint, the 970HD is about the same as the 971H. Oppo packaged the same remote control that was later offered to 971H owners. While it is still not the best remote out there, it is A LOT better than their old design and gets the job done. The player’s set-up menus are very easy to navigate and have options for setting up the picture and preferences for audio output, including adjustments for audio output levels, crossover, and delay. The 970HD lets you pick between bitstream and PCM for the HDMI output. Unfortunately if you pick PCM, all Dolby Digital and DTS soundtracks will be converted to PCM for output. I’ve never tested a player that has done this before. You can work around this by using the standard digital output for DVD movie soundtracks and the HDMI for high-resolution audio if you intend to use this player for DVD Audio or SACD.

A bug that I ran into with the 970HD is playback of DVD Audio and SACD via HDMI. I am currently using the Anthem Statement D2 A/V processor in my system, and it is HDMI 1.1 compliant. But for some reason, the only way to get the full output support of DVD Audio and SACD is if I set the output of the 970HD to 1080i. Otherwise it is truncated in both resolution and number of channels present. Anything other than 1080i results in stereo only playback, even if 5.1 sound was selected. I informed Oppo and Anthem of the issue, and it is being looked into. Oppo has tested this feature on numerous receivers that support HDMI 1.1 and apparently some have this issue and some don’t, so if this is an important feature to you, make sure you check it out if you purchase this player. Oppo’s customer support is superb, so I am quite sure that they will do anything and everything they can to help.

The speed of the 970HD is outstanding. Disc loads are extremely fast, chapter skips are almost instantaneous, and the layer change is completely seamless. Absolutely no complaints in this department!

I was excited to see how the 970HD would test in our benchmark. I realized right up front that the MTK MPEG decoder would only do so well in our de-interlacing tests, but I was looking at this player more from the transport standpoint, so its core video performance was the most important aspect to me. And Oppo hit a home run here.

When I first received the 970HD, I immediately tested it with an output resolution of 480i. This is the resolution I was the most interested in as I have several outboard video processors at my disposal and a few of them accept 480i via HDMI. Immediately I found a problem. The Mediatek had severe CUE issues when outputting 480i. This was strange, because I’ve tested lots of MTK based DVD players before, and chroma performance is usually near perfect. When I switched the player to 480p, all of the CUE issues went away! Now that is REALLY bizarre. The player did the correct upsampling with a progressive output, but not interlaced. I talked to Oppo about it, and they relayed the information to Mediatek to see if it could be resolved. A few weeks later I got news from Oppo that a firmware fix had been developed! After installing the firmware (software download), I re-checked and sure enough the problem was completely solved! Just another reason Oppo Digital has continued to impress me over and over again with their product support!

The rest of the core video performance testing went quite well. The only limitation I found was the selection of output color space. DVD is mastered in YCbCr 4:2:0, and most (if not all) MPEG decoders upsample this to YCbCr 4:2:2 for output. Unfortunately, the engineers at Mediatek have noticed issues with the 4:2:2 output, so selections for this chip, and the 970HD, are limited to RGB and YCbCr 4:4:4. While not a huge deal by any means, I still like to see support for 4:2:2. Both color space outputs are mapped correctly and pass below black and above white information.

For pixel cropping, I measured all output resolutions for both the HDMI output and the component output. The HDMI output had different results with every resolution. 480i had 1 pixel cropped from the bottom, 480p had no cropping, 720p had 2 pixels cropped from the right side, and 1080i had only 1 pixel cropped from the right side. While we like to see no pixel cropping at all, less than 2 on any side and 2 or less overall for any output resolution isn’t too shabby. The component output was a different matter. The 480i output was the same as the HDMI 480i output, but the 480p output was cropping 4 pixels from the top, 1 from the right, and 3 from the left. Definitely a bit more excessive on this output, and our suggestion is to use the HDMI output if possible.

Another issue I found when I initially got the player was the default white level for the component outputs. It was on the high side, but lowering the player’s contrast setting to -3 fixed the issue. Oppo came through again with new firmware which adjusted the output level to the appropriate level by default. The component output measured in at exactly 100 IRE as it should.

Neither the HDMI output nor the component output suffers from Y/C delay. I measured the component output using a bowtie pattern and a digital oscilloscope, and Y/C timing was perfect. For HDMI, I used a Y/C delay test pattern from the new Anchor Bay Technologies VRS test disc.

The Mediatek MPEG decoder did as I expected with our de-interlacing tests. This chip is slightly better than average, but it can be a bit sluggish when it comes to locking on to a cadence. It does trip up with a few of our more difficult tests, but I expected as much from an all-in-one chip solution. What did surprise me though was the Mediatek’s diagonal line processing. Using the “3 angles” test from the HQV Benchmark DVD, I was pleased to see that Mediatek has developed some type of diagonal line processing for video-based material. While it wasn’t quite to the level of popular solutions like the Realta HQV or Faroudja DCDi, it did a very commendable job with the lines.

The Mediatek chip did a fine job with the majority of our 3-2 based cadence patterns, including incorrectly flagged ones, video flagged, and high detail. It also supports a 2-2 cadence pretty well with no obvious artifacts in our test using the Natural Splendors DVD.

Overall, I would say the Mediatek did an above-average job in our de-interlacing tests for an all-in-one solution, but it still does not live up to the bar set by the higher line video processing chips out there now. Keep in mind though, this player costs a fraction of the price of players normally incorporating those chips.

Conclusions

Once again, Oppo Digital has proved that you don’t need to spend a lot of money to get an outstanding product. The 970HD would make an excellent digital transport for feeding a standalone video processor, but it also holds its own very well too. Support for both DVD Audio and SACD via HDMI is just icing on the cake. If you are looking for a solid transport, then add the DV-970HD to your short list of capable players. If you are looking for a great budget DVD player, this may just be your ticket.

Video Frequency Response
Oppo Digital

Divider

Sony - DVP-NS75H

MPEG Maker: Sony
MPEG Model: CXD9804R
Deinterlacer Maker: Unknown
Deinterlacer Model: Unknown
   
MSRP: $119.99
Website: http://www.sony.com

DVP-NS75H (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags

DVP-NS75H (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags

It has been awhile since I’ve tested a Sony DVD player, mostly because I just haven’t been receiving any to look at. I was pleased with their recent turnaround in performance when they started moving away from the previous MPEG decoders they were using. Although I like some of the decoders they used in the past for speed and core video performance, they weren’t paying off for de-interlacing and scaling duties.

The DVP-NS75H represents the best progressive scan player I’ve tested from Sony so far. Surprising because it is also one of the cheapest players they’ve released. I am not sure what MPEG decoder they are using here as it has the standard Sony stamp on it, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it is a Mediatek design. The player is quite fast and performs very similar to some other MTK based players I’ve tested.

The NS75H isn’t the prettiest player on the block, but it isn’t cheap looking for its price either. The chassis is straightforward plastic, but it doesn’t look gimmicky either. Build quality is what I would hope for. Of all the players I tested this go around, it had the most impressive internal design with a decent power supply board.

From an operability standpoint the NS75H does quite well. It is very responsive, and its user interface is straightforward and easy to operate. The player has an HDMI output and supports upscaling to 1080i. Sony obviously cut back on the price by not including SACD, but with the dearth of new titles on the SACD format, I am not surprised. Those looking for high-end Sony audio should probably check out some of their higher priced offerings.

The core video performance of the NS75H is just above average for a progressive scan player nowadays. The player does not suffer from any of the CUE issues that plagued so many of Sony’s early DVD offerings, and it retains the full dynamic range of the image via HDMI and component video by passing below-black and above-white information. It does not use a chroma filter for 4:2:0 material, which is the only reason I am not completely sure this is a MTK based player.

Y/C delay is a problem with the component video output. The player has well over a full pixel of delay with this output. The HDMI output didn’t show any signs of Y/C delay and is definitely the preferred output choice for this player.

Pixel cropping is an issue with both outputs and rather excessive on the left side of the image.

In our de-interlacing tests the Sony did better than expected. It passed the majority of our tests and should do quite well with standard DVDs on the market. The player had no issues with 3-2 and 2-2 based material and actually did quite well with video based material. The video processor did a very commendable job with diagonal line processing using the HQV test disc. This is another reason I think they may be using an MTK MPEG decoder, as the results have been similar with other players using this chip.

The NS75H did trip up with some of the mixed flag material. I saw some light combing with our Galaxy Quest trailer clip around the planet and ship engine, and the player combed immediately with our mixed flag test. This has become common with just about every player out there using an all-in-one chip solution for their decoding and de-interlacing.

Conclusions

It is great to see so many low priced players starting to really offer decent video performance. In the early days there were some rare apples that popped up on occasion and impressed us, but lately I’ve seen some great offerings for people to choose from for well under $200. If you are looking for a solid progressive scan player with HDMI support for any room in the house, the Sony DVP-NS75H is one to consider.

Video Frequency Response
Sony

Divider

Microsoft - Xbox 360 HD DVD Add-On

MPEG Maker: Microsoft
MPEG Model:
Deinterlacer Maker: Microsoft
Deinterlacer Model:
   
MSRP: $199.99
Website: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/default.htm

Xbox 360 HD DVD Add-On - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

Last year, Microsoft delivered their next generation gaming platform, the Xbox 360. This platform combined state of the art high definition gaming with media console features, making it a well rounded entertainment hub. When we tested the 360 in our DVD benchmark, it set the bar for performance from a game console with DVD playback. Since then, Microsoft has offered several software updates through Xbox Live and has recently shipped out the HD DVD add-on. This add-on allows the 360 to play back the new HD DVD format on top of standard DVD support. We decided to test the add-on as a standard DVD player to see if Microsoft has indeed raised the bar again.

The HD add-on is relatively small and reminds me of the older stand-alone Jazz drives that you could attach to PCs or laptops. Its shape and aesthetics are very similar to the main console, and connection to the 360 console is made through a simple USB cable. The add-on comes with a CD that walks you through setting the drive up.

The performance of the add-on is very similar to the 360 as a standard DVD player. Like the main console, the resolution is limited to 480p. The console supports resolutions of up to 1080p, but the DVD forum mandates that all DVD players limit their analog video outputs to 480p, so I guess we’re stuck with that for awhile.

All of the video processing and de-interlacing is done in software, and Microsoft developed all of their own codes for this. They did quite a good job, but fell short of what you might expect from a high-line progressive scan DVD player.

This player does not seem to be cadence based, but rather relies on the flags to decide how to de-interlace. This makes it quick to recover from a hiccup in the flags, but combing is evident at each hiccup. The add-on passed the same tests as the 360, but this time it passed our Bad Edits test.

The add-on failed most of our tests that have breaks in cadence or flags. This is what separates a good progressive scan player from a great one. There is a reason that names like Gennum, Faroudja, and ABT have become synonymous with great DVD playback. Rather than rely on the disc's flags (which are usually poor), they examine the cadence of the material and make smarter decisions on how to combine the progressive fields and deliver a progressive image.

For video based material, the add-on is average. It passed our motion adaptive tests but does not feature any diagonal line processing for video-based material. Jaggies were abundant using the 3-Clocks test on the Silicon Optix Benchmark DVD.

On the core side, the add-on does extremely well. Response times have not changed at all. This is a really fast transport, and navigation is basically instantaneous. It is almost unnerving how fast this player navigates menus and chapters. I wish some of the DVD player manufacturers would take note. The layer change is nearly seamless, and clocked in just under a half a second.

Core video performance is also quite good. The add-on passed all of our CUE tests with the exception of the 4:2:0 ICP test, which requires an extra chroma filter to pass. There are no signs of Y/C delay, and pixel cropping is limited to 2 pixels on the left and 1 on the bottom.

All of the video levels are correct, and this player passes below-black and above-white information. The output retains the full resolution of both the luma and chroma signal, and the analog video frequency response remains unchanged from the original 360 console.

Conclusions

We will be serving up a complete review of the HD DVD add-on very shortly that will cover the full capabilities of this accessory as a HD DVD player. For now, the add-on continues the performance of the 360 as a stand-alone DVD player and continues to set the bar as a game console-based DVD player. At only $199 (for current 360 owners of course), this thing is a steal.

Video Frequency Response
Microsoft

Divider

Sony - DVP-NS90V

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: unknown
   
MSRP: $199.95
Website: http://www.sony.com

DVP-NS90V (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

DVP-NS90V (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

Recently I had the opportunity to test Sony’s flagship DVD player, the DVP-9100ES. While I was impressed with the build, features, and video processing, the player needed work in its core performance. This has become more and more of an issue it seems in the last year or so. As video processing has been getting better and better, attention to detail in some of the most critical areas has been getting worse. The unfortunate side of this is the core performance has more to do with the manufacturer then anything else. Does this mean they are getting lazy, or that they just don’t care? It is a hard question to ask but an even harder one to answer. Most video processing chips do just fine in their default state nowadays, so implementing them is not hard. Most user interfaces are rehashes of older designs and are generic amongst whole product lines most of the time. But tweaking the full performance of the core video properties takes time and attention to detail. It means you have to look for the issues before hand and work with the chipmakers to get it right. I’ve seen some companies invest serious amounts of time in this, and others just push out the same problems over and over again, year after year.

For this review I took a crack at one of Sony’s entry offerings, the DVP-NS90V. This player is much different than the DVP-9100ES in every way. The build quality is in an entirely different league and its video processing isn’t at the same level. But here is a player that actually performed better on the core side. The DVP-NS90V uses a different MPEG decoder; that much was apparent right from the start. So this could mean that the chip’s default performance was better from the start and didn’t require much tweaking. But it really makes me wonder why a player that costs less than half of another would actually have these important details worked out.

I was unable to figure out what MPEG decoder is being used for the DVP-NS90V. Most Sony DVD players have the information on the top of the chip scraped off, blacked out, or stamped with a generic Sony stamp. I have some suspicions that it may be a Mediatek offering, but I can’t prove it. Its responsiveness and chroma performance suggest it though. Sony is not using a two-chip solution here, so all MPEG decoding and de-interlacing/scaling are being done with this single chip. The video processing performance is also inline with what I would expect from a solution like this.

The NS90V is more of an entry DVD player by price point, but it does have some attractive features that have been making their way down the price ladder. This includes support for SACD (Sony’s high-resolution audio format), HDMI, and scaling to high definition resolutions. The player is average in build for its price point, and has a clean design as well as a reasonably friendly user interface. The HDMI output supports standard PCM and Dolby Digital and DTS soundtracks, but not SACD or DVD-A digital out. The HDMI video output supports 480p, 720p, and 1080i. Support for 480i is not offered, making this player a bad choice as a straight digital transport. That is unfortunate as its core performance on the HDMI side is pretty good.

The player is very good from a usability standpoint. Menu navigation and chapter skips were very fast, making operability smooth. The initial load times were a bit on the sluggish side though, which seems to be a reoccurring theme with the Sony players. The player’s layer change was very fast and clocked in at less than a second.

I started my tests with the digital side of the house first. I evaluated all of the HDMI output resolutions but conducted the majority of the benchmark tests with 720p to match the native resolution of the projector I had at the time. The core performance of the HDMI output was quite good and better than the analog component output. You can choose from two output color spaces: YCbCr and RGB. The YCbCr output is upsampled to 4:4:4, which is another indicator that this is indeed a Mediatek-based player (the new Mediatek chips are having chroma issues with 4:2:2 YCbCr so they don’t include this output option). The luma scale is correct and uses video RGB levels with black correctly set at digital 16 and white at digital 235. Above white and below black information are retained.

The HDMI output did extremely well with our chroma upsampling error (CUE) tests, failing only the expected 4:2:0 ICP test. It actually did quite poor in this test though with very pronounced streaking in moving objects, in fact, far more than any other Mediatek player I’ve looked at in the past. The DVP-NS90V had no signs of Y/C delay via HDMI, and pixel cropping was limited to just 3 pixels on the left side.

The component outputs had somewhat different results. While they performed the same with our CUE tests, the analog outputs suffered from over a full pixel of Y/C delay. All NTSC video is basically two complete frames of video overlaid onto each other. One contains the luma (black and white) data, and the other has the chroma (color) data. This information is combined to give you the full color image. This is why grayscale is adjusted when a display is calibrated. If the grayscale (the luma information from black to white)is incorrect, it can skew the color information. If there is Y/C delay, the images do not line up properly on the display causing what looks like ghosting or ringing on one side of the picture. With the NS90V, the chroma information is delayed to the left side so the right side of an object will appear to have some ringing. Images also tend to be softer from this problem similar to what you see when convergence is off in an analog or 3-chip digital display solution.

The white level of the player is just a tad low but still passed our criteria. Using a gray ramp and a digital oscilloscope, we measured the expected 100 IRE output at 99 IRE. This should have a negligible effect on contrast. The overall video frequency response of the analog video was quite good and near flat. There was just some mild increase in the upper frequency range, but I did not see any ringing as a result. The component output does not crop any pixels and retains the full active image.

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, the Sony did about average for its price point. This is the drawback of a one-chip solution. At this time there are quite a few other players on the market at this price point using the Genesis FLI-2310 solution which offers far better de-interlacing performance, but even that solution has its caveats. The now infamous “macroblocking” bug manifests with a lot of displays out there, making the image near un-watchable for some consumers. At this time, there are just no other low-cost video processing solutions being used, so the lower end market tends to be below average in overall video prowess.

The NS90V does do true inverse telecine de-interlacing with both 3-2 and 2-2 based cadences, which covers the majority of the software on the market today. This player also features motion adaptive de-interlacing for video based material and does a fairly decent job with diagonal line processing. While not nearly as good as Faroudja’s DCDi solution or some of the other newer chips out there, it is not nearly as bad as most current single chip DVD players.

The Sony did fail the majority of our “hiccup” tests. These include chapter breaks and bad flagging. Recovery times are good, but you will notice either combing or softening of the image if the DVDs have mastering issues. This is where higher end de-interlacing solutions outperform these budget players and offer the best playback experience.

Conclusions

Overall, the Sony NS90V is quite a decent player. While it is by no means the best budget player I’ve reviewed, it only has a few drawbacks and will perform fine for the majority of DVDs out there. It offers some nice features for the money, and its video performance is about average for this part of the market. If you are looking for a decent low budget player, then the Sony DVP-NS90V might be one player to consider.

Video Frequency Response
Sony

Divider

Toshiba - SD-5980

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 778
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 778
   
MSRP: $149.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-5980 (HDMI) - Film

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-5980 (HDMI) - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-5980 (Component) - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-5980 (Component) - Film

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-5980 (HDMI) - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-5980 (Component) - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

Like the Samsung HD-850, the Toshiba SD-5980 is an OEM-based DVD player (meaning that a different company builds it for Samsung) that revolves around the new Zoran video processing. This includes the Zoran Vaddis 778 and the HD Extreme chip for scaling. These players are priced identically, and both provide an HDMI output, and even include an HDMI cable. The Toshiba adds a few more features, including some slots for different media cards (digital camera memory cards) for slide shows.

The Vaddis 778 handles the MPEG decoding and the de-interlacing, and does an average job with both. I was happy to see that Zoran has made strides with their chroma performance since the Vaddis 5 chip. This new chip doesn’t have any signs of the chroma bug and even does surprisingly well with 4:2:0 test material. This test normally requires special chroma filters that are usually found on high end video processors, but Zoran has done a remarkable job with their all-in-one solution.

Toshiba has included three different progressive modes for the end user to choose from. These include Auto, Film, and Video. The Auto and Film modes performed exactly the same, while the Video mode dropped the film cadence processing and didn’t improve on the video processing a bit. Because of this, we only suggest using the Auto mode, as it handles all material equally well. This player is not on par with the better de-interlacers out there, but it will handle the majority of DVDs just fine.

The core side is a bit of a hit or miss for this player. The HDMI output will not output proper RGB levels when converted to DVI which results in a loss of below-black and above-white information. If your display has an HDMI input, you should be fine though. Via component video output, this player’s video frequency response is a bit rolled off in the upper end, but not as much as the Samsung HD-850. It does have a smidgen of Y/C delay, and the player is a bit slower then the Samsung HD-850. The layer change clocked in at 1.25 seconds which isn’t bad, but it is a full second slower then the 850.

Overall, I don’t know which of these two I would pick personally. Neither has the video processing that would fit my needs, but I think either would be fine for most consumers. I wish there were a fusion of the two players out there since both have their highs and lows. If you are considering either of these two players, you should probably make sure you test both of them in the store before making a decision.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

LG - DN191H

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 888
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 888
   
MSRP: $109.95
Website: http://us.lge.com/index.do

DN191H (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

DN191H (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

The DN191H is only the third player I’ve tested from LG, and so far I haven’t been very impressed with their track record. While this isn’t the highest scoring player from them in the Benchmark it is still probably the most recommended out of the group. LG has moved away from the Genesis/Faroudja solution and now relies on the very popular Vaddis decoder/video processing chips from Zoran. While there are certainly better chips out there to use, the Vaddis usually does a pretty decent job with the majority of DVDs.

The 191H is a very inexpensive DVD player and can be found for under $100 at most electronics stores or on-line. This makes it an attractive option for a second room or a bedroom player. The inclusion of HDMI at this price point and decent video performance are rarities even in today’s market.

The build quality of the 191H isn’t the best I’ve seen at this price point but it certainly isn’t an unattractive player by any means. The front face has a nice curve to it and is laid out in a subtle but regal way. The buttons on the top curve of the face are also a nice touch. The 191H sports an HDMI output and upconverts to HD resolutions of 720p and 1080i. It also features a 14-in-1 card reader for pictures and music. The 191H supports DIVX and MPEG-4 for personally made DVDs and video.

The LG is a decent player from a user standpoint. It isn’t the most responsive I’ve tested lately, but it did a decent job with menus and chapter skips. Load times could have been better though. The user interface is simple enough too. The layer change was quite fast and barely noticeable in our tests.

As I mentioned before, the 191H uses a Zoran Vaddis MPEG decoder for its principle video decoding and processing duties. We’ve tested this chip in lots of players, and its performance is nearly always the same. The Zoran does quite well with CUE but lacks some of the more advanced video processing required for state-of-the-art de-interlacing.

The 191H didn’t do as well as I would have hoped in our core video performance tests. The HDMI output suffers from Y/C delay, and it clips head and toe room. I don’t know why so many manufacturers have issues with these core video components. In the early days you could easily blame the HDMI transmitter for doing an improper colorspace conversion with the outgoing video signal, but since HDMI has been out awhile now, you would think that they would have gotten their stuff together in these departments. The component video output did not clip head and toe room, but it did have some rather severe Y/C delay. Basically you can pick your poison for the two outputs, but I think I would go with the HDMI output despite the clipping, as the Y/C delay wasn’t quite as bad, and the digital signal was a tad sharper.

The newer Zoran chips, such as the 888, have been doing a lot better in regards to CUE than their earlier (and higher line) offerings. This one is no different. The 888 passes all of our CUE tests and utilizes a subtle chroma filter with 4:2:0 material. This chip is one of the better ones out there with CUE and reminds me a lot of the Mediatek offerings in this regard.

For de-interlacing, the LG does about the same as any player that uses the Zoran Vaddis chip for this purpose. The Vaddis handles the most common cadences just fine but goes a bit awry when things get sticky. The 191H passed the common 3-2 cadence based tests and did a decent job with video based material as well. The diagonal line processing isn’t very good, so don’t look for performance like the Faroudja DCDi or ABT solutions.

The Vaddis didn’t do very well with some of the more difficult tests we threw at it. Some of our video and mixed flagged tests showed obvious combing or a complete lack of lock on. This can result in combing, a loss of resolution, or stuttering artifacts, depending on the material you are viewing. This may or may not be an issue, depending on the quality of the encode on the DVD, but we’ve definitely seen issues with this in real world DVD offerings. This is in line with most single chip video processing solutions on the market though and usually requires a higher quality de-interlacer solution to remedy. At this price point I didn’t really expect much better.

Conclusions

Not much more to say about this one. The LG is a very low priced player, and its performance is pretty much commensurate with the price tag. While I don’t think I would recommend it for serious home theaters, it would be fine for a spare room or a younger member of the family on a budget. Now if only I could get my hands on their new universal HD player!

Video Frequency Response
LG

Divider

Philips - DVP5960

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: Unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: Unknown
   
MSRP: $89.99
Website: http://www.consumer.philips.com

DVP5960 (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

DVP5960 (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

The DVP5960 is currently Philips' flagship DVD player and it sells for less than $100! It is really amazing how much price points have changed over the last few years. Here we have upscaling DVD players with HDMI outputs coming in for pennies compared to where they were just a little while ago.

Despite the fact that this is the highest priced standard DVD player from Philips (they have a Blu-ray player as well that is a re-badged Samsung), it isn’t near the quality level you would expect from a flagship design. Philips is obviously sticking to the budget minded mass market prices. This player is built like a $100 player and is extremely light in weight and features. That doesn’t make it a bad buy; I just don’t want people to think that this player is up there with the high end flagship players.

The DVP5960 has some nice features on top of its video playback. There is support for MP3 and WMA, and with the USB input, you can have a bit of a music or photo server anywhere you put it. Not bad for the price. This player does not support any of the high-resolution audio formats though, which is a bit of a bummer.

I really didn’t know what to expect when I started my video tests. It has been a LONG time since I’ve tested a player from Philips, and I don’t remember being particularly impressed with their previous offerings. I was curious as to what MPEG decoder and video processing solution they may be using, but once I got the player open, I realized that I wouldn’t be able to find out, due to the construction of their video board.

The 5960 did rather poorly with our core video tests. Both outputs (component and HDMI) have their issues, but the component output fared better in the long run. The HDMI output suffers from obvious Y/C delay, and it also clips head and toe room. This is becoming a problem that isn’t going away despite reporting it repeatedly to companies in reviews. The component output isn’t clipping head and toe room, but it does suffer from Y/C delay, and it is a little worse than the HDMI output in that respect.

The 5960 did very well with our CUE tests, which is finally becoming the norm. It does not have a filter for 4:2:0 material, so that ruled out some of the MPEG decoders I thought they may be using (Zoran or Mediatek designs). I’m really glad to see more MPEG decoders out there getting this right; now if only we could see the same with below-black and above-white!

After testing out the core video section, I ran some tests to see how the 5960 holds up from a usability standpoint. The menu system is all right, but could use some more flexibility, as they are almost too simple. I was impressed with the speed of the player though; menus were quick to navigate, and chapter skips weren’t an issue. The layer change also clocked in at a decent half second.

On the de-interlacing side, the 5960 did far better than I was expecting for a sub-$100 player. The all-in-one solution did quite well in our tests and passed the majority of the main tests, including most of our 3-2 cadences and all of our video based testing. This player handles a standard 3-2 and 2-2 cadence with no real issues at all. It did fail our bad edits test and our mixed flags test, but that is pretty common for a player with this type of design. This can result in some occasion combing, but only with a small amount of content on the market nowadays.

Conclusions

It is nice to see that even at less than $100, a consumer can still find a pretty decent DVD player. Here you get HDMI support, upscaling to 720p and 1080i, and rather decent video processing. While I wouldn’t recommend it as a reference design or the mainstay in a high performance home theater, it would probably please the majority of the mass market in almost all applications. If you’re looking for a budget player that delivers a solid video experience, this one is worth looking into.

Video Frequency Response
Philips

Divider

Toshiba - SD-K860

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 888
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 888
   
MSRP: $79.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-K860 (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

SD-K860 (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

The SD-K860 is Toshiba’s newest budget entry into the digital DVD player category. It is the least expensive HDMI based DVD player I’ve seen from Toshiba to date, and it offers commensurate performance to its price point. It is exciting to see HDMI based DVD players coming in under $100, but so far my experience with them hasn’t been very good. For our Benchmark, two big manufacturers have really let me down with their offerings and it all comes down to the core performance of the player, which is crucial. The SD-K860 definitely has some issues in this department.

The K860 is based on Zoran’s newest all-in-one MPEG decoder/video processing chip, the Vaddis 888. I have evaluated a lot of players that use Zoran chips and their performance is never consistent between models for some reason, so I was interested in seeing how this new chip would fare compared to their older models.

Immediately I was impressed with the chip’s chroma performance in our CUE tests. The last few Zoran chips have done well here, and this one seems to improve even more on their performance. The K860 passed all of our CUE tests, including the 4:2:0 ICP test, which is VERY rare. This MPEG decoder also handles layer changes very well with a near seamless layer change delivered with our difficult full bitrate test.

The MPEG decoder only outputs 4:4:4 YCbCr with no other selections available. The HDMI output supports 480p, 720p, and 1080i, and the component output supports 480i and 480p. There are quite a few differences in terms of performance between the two outputs, with the component output fairing a bit better in our core video tests.

The HDMI output suffers from over a full pixel of Y/C delay. This lends to a softer picture, as the two fields of the image are not converged properly, so there are some slight outlines on objects. The HDMI output is also clipping head and toe room. Video is encoded with black and white at digital 16 and 235 respectfully in an 8 bit system (255 levels). This player is truncating the information that falls after those points. Some don’t see this as a big deal, but it does not preserve the intended dynamic range of DVD, and it also creates issues for calibration.

There is absolutely no pixel cropping via HDMI at any resolution. This was nice, and a rarity in player testing lately.

The component output retains the full dynamic range of video and does not clip below black or above white information. The white level measured in at a respectable 99 IRE, which is close to the reference 100 IRE it should be. The analog video frequency response was also quite flat, with no artificial ringing or smearing in the upper frequencies. There is some slight pixel cropping via component, with a combined 5 pixels being clipped from the sides of the image, and 2 pixels cropped from the bottom. I don’t know why the component output has pixel cropping, but the HDMI output does not. They should match each other.

From a usability standpoint, the K860 could use some work. Load times - when you insert a disc - are a bit sluggish, and operability - once a disc is loaded - is slower than I would expect from a later generation DVD player. Menu navigation was tedious at times, with a lot of lagging in between selections. Chapter skips were pretty fast though, once a feature was started. The overall user interface and set-up was easy, if not a bit limited.

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, the Zoran chip did pretty well for this price point. The player passed the majority of our tests, with the exception of our Bad Flagging tests. The player failed our 3-2 Mixed Flags and 3-2 Video Flags tests along with our Incorrect Progressive Flags test. So the player isn’t really cadence based, though it did perform cadence detections in some of our other tests. The K860 does handle a 2-2 cadence for video based material but its diagonal line processing is terrible, with severe jaggies using the HQV test disc material.

Conclusions

Overall, I found the SD-K860 to be a sub-par DVD player. There were some highlights, but the player needs work in its core video performance. This has become an unsettling trend lately in our tests. While I don’t expect top of the line performance at this price point, the issues found here should just not be a problem regardless of the price. Limitations in video processing are expected, not limitations in core performance. While this is an attractive price point for a HDMI based DVD player, I would have to recommend looking elsewhere.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

Toshiba - SD-K760

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 888
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 888
   
MSRP: $59.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-K760 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

The Toshiba SD-K760 is literally Toshiba’s entry-level progressive scan player (July, 2006). It is as light on features as it is on price. This player is sold at major wholesale outlets like Sam’s Club and Costco and provides a reasonable amount of performance for the money.

The SD-K760 is very similar to the SD-K860 but is missing the HDMI output of the more expensive counterpart. The analog video performance is almost identical though. The K760 has an extremely small profile and is not very deep. Opening the player revealed a very small video board, a DVD transport, and a small power supply board. If Toshiba really wanted to, they could have made this player a lot smaller than it is, but I am glad they stuck to the standard width.

Set-up is very simple, with selection for interlaced or progressive video being the only real selections needed. The K760 uses the new Zoran Vaddis 888 MPEG decoder, like the K860 also reviewed in a recent Benchmark. This is Zoran’s newest chip offering, and its performance is quite good for an obvious budget solution.

The player performed pretty well in our core video testing, with only a few shortcomings. The Zoran chip does a superb job with our CUE tests, showing no signs at all of the chroma bug, even with our 4:2:0 ICP test. This is extremely rare for a one-chip-based DVD player. The SD-K760 passed our below black tests and its white level was set at 100 IRE, which is perfect. There is some slight pixel cropping, with 5 pixels clipped from the right and left side combined and 2 from the bottom of the image.

The component output suffers from over a full pixel of Y/C delay. This results is a softer picture, with artificial haloing around some images, similar to what you see with convergence problems in certain displays. The video frequency response of the player is quite good, and near flat. I didn’t see any loss of resolution using a multi-burst test pattern on my display or with our digital oscilloscope.

Overall, operation of the player was a bit on the disappointing side, much like the K860. Load times were slow, and menu navigation was on the tedious side. Navigating the menus on our AVIA and WHQL test discs was slow enough to become on the bothersome side, which is a rarity nowadays. The layer change was really fast though and near seamless, which is always great to see (or rather not see!!).

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, this player did about average for a one chip solution nowadays. The chip seems to be a flag-based de-interlacer, as it failed the majority of our bad flagging tests. This includes the 3-2 Mixed Flag, 3-2 Video Flag, and Incorrect Progressive Flag tests. The good thing about the flag-based design though is its recovery time when switching between film based and video based cadences. It is near instantaneous.

The Vaddis 888 MPEG decoder handled 3-2 cadences and 2-2 cadences very well, as long as there were no hiccups in the flags, so the SD-K760 should do well for the majority of normal DVD viewing.

Conclusions

The Toshiba SD-K760 has the same shortcomings as the K860, but since you can find this player for around $50, I think a lot of the issues could be overlooked. This would be a good fit for a bedroom or kid’s room where you’re not looking for great performance or operability, but rather just an extra player.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

Samsung - HD-850

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 778
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 778
   
MSRP: $149.99
Website: http://www.samsungusa.com

HD-850 (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

HD-850 (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Motion Adaptive

The Samsung HD-850 is almost identical to the Toshiba SD-5980 that we are also featuring in this edition of the Benchmark. They both rely on the exact same chips but use a vastly different user interface.

The 850 is obviously Samsung’s version of a stripped down 841. It supports HDMI and scaled resolutions of 480p, 720p, and 1080i, but they got rid of DVD Audio and SACD support. For video processing they chose to go with new solutions from Zoran. The Zoran Vaddis 778 is employed for MPEG decoding and de-interlacing duties, and the Vaddis HD Extreme is used for scaling.

Like most Vaddis chips, the 778 is OK with film based material that has good flagging, but it’s not the best with cadence breaks or video material. In fact, it isn’t even motion-adaptive. The image breaks up with any change in cadence, and I noticed some pretty severe jaggies with video-based material.

The HD-850 is different than the Toshiba SD-5980 in that it offers only one progressive mode with no user selectable settings. Some may call this a big deal, but there was really no need for one since even the modes that Toshiba adds don’t bring any performance advantages. This chip has equal performance for both film and video and supports a 3-2 and 2-2 cadence.

The core performance is where you see the most separation between the Toshiba and the Samsung. The Samsung has user adjustments for RBG levels via HDMI including settings for PC and Studio RGB levels. Of course, we always recommend using Studio RGB levels, as this is the format DVD is mastered in. If you have a DVI-based display though, this player incorrectly converts the RGB levels to PC so you will not get above-white or below-black. But the levels are correct if going HDMI to HDMI.

The player has a full pixel of Y/C delay via its component outputs. The Toshiba is a bit better in this regard. The layer change was faster than the Toshiba, coming in under a second,and the menu navigation was also quite speedy. This player is also better in terms of pixel cropping,but its video frequency response via component video is a bit more rolled off than the Toshiba, so if component video is important to you, the image may be a bit softer. Another downside of the 850 is its white level via component video. This player measured at 97 IRE, which is on the low side. The Toshiba was closer to the reference 100 IRE mark and will produce a punchier picture.

The Vaddis 778 did very well in our chroma tests. Even the ICP 4:2:0 test looked terrific without chroma filters. It is nice to see that Zoran has addressed this issue with it newer chips.

Overall, the Samsung is about the same as the majority of the players out there. It has its issues which are mainly trivial, and it is surprising that Samsung doesn’t address these things before they get out. It would be pretty simple. The de-interlacing is average overall and should do fine with most DVDs on the market today. For the discerning videophile, I would have to suggest you look elsewhere. Since the Toshiba and the Samsung have identical de-interlacing performance, you should pay attention to the core performance and figure out what is important to you. Both players have caveats, but some may or may not matter to you.

Video Frequency Response
Samsung

Divider

Pioneer - DV-588A

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: MT1389EE
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: MT1389EE
   
MSRP: $129.99
Website: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com

DV-588A - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags

This was a big surprise entry in the April/May DVD Benchmark. The Pioneer DV-588A is the successor to the DV-578 which I reviewed last year. I was quite impressed with the DV-578 and was pretty anxious to see how Pioneer would follow it up. This new offering is almost identical to the 578 but adds a few new features including DivX and Windows Media Audio support.

Like the DV-578, the 588 utilizes a Mediatek MPEG decoder for all of its video processing duties. So again, despite the “Pioneer Pure Progressive” logo on the front, this is not a Pioneer video processing design. The player only has its default de-interlacing mode, but it did have quite a few adjustments for things like contrast, brightness, hue, and gamma.

Overall de-interlacing performance was just a touch above average, and this is definitely one of the better implementations of the Mediatek chipset. Thankfully, the player is motion adaptive, which few Mediatek players are. With all of our 3-2 cadence tests, the Pioneer performed well, but did trip up a bit with some breaks in cadence. This player supports PAL playback and does a pretty great job at PAL to NTSC conversion much like the 578. The 588A also supports a 2-2 cadence and did quite well with our Natural Splendors test scene.

The core side of this player is where I had the most issues. The biggest offenders were Y/C delay and below-black performance. Th 588A would not pass a below-black pluge signal, and Y/C delay was greater than 1 pixel on both the Pb and Pr channels. This is what we saw from the 578 in core performance and is a rather surprising overlook by Pioneer. I am hoping that they will address both of these issues with a firmware update soon.

The player’s video output level was spot on at 100 IRE, and the frequency response was almost ruler flat with only a slight nudge up in the mid and upper frequency range. The sharpness test pattern from AVIA Pro didn’t show any signs of ringing, and the player resolved the full resolution potential of DVD perfectly.

This player does have some pixel cropping issues. The right and left sides of the image combined for 7 pixels cropped, while the bottom clipped off 1.

The best part of the Mediatek implementation here has to be the user interface and responsiveness. The 588 has a completely seamless layer change, and its menu and chapter navigation are extremely fast. I did knock a bit of a point off for its load times though, which I felt were a tad sluggish. The player also did extremely well with our chroma tests, passing all of them easily with the exception of the 4:2:0 ICP test. Surprisingly, this chip didn’t do near as well as it normally does with that test, and streaking was blatantly obvious.

The 588 is a budget universal transport, supporting DVD-Audio and SACD. This support includes full time alignment and bass management, though the time alignment is a bit more limited for the SACD side. Unfortunately, there was no way of telling what crossover point Pioneer uses for the bass management, but based on the available specifications for Burr Brown PCM DACs, I can pretty much conclude that this player does convert DSD to PCM regardless of the setup. While I don’t find this to be a big deal at all, I know there are some people who will frown on this (it is pretty common though).

Summary: Overall, the Pioneer DV-588A is an excellent player for the money and on my short list of recommended players under $150. In reality, I would almost call it a steal. I am quite surprised that some of the same issues that were readily apparent with the DV-578 showed up again with the 588. What is the point of a new model that doesn’t address problems in older models? I really hope that Pioneer takes the time to fix these issues with a future firmware update.

Video Frequency Response
Pioneer

Divider

Panasonic - DVD-RP62

MPEG Maker: MEI
MPEG Model: MN677533MP
Deinterlacer Maker: Genesis
Deinterlacer Model: FLI2200
   
MSRP: $179.95
Website: http://www.panasonic.com

DVD-RP62 - Auto1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

DVD-RP62 - Auto2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Recovery Time
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Incorrect Progressive Flags

Deinterlacing

This player uses the Genesis FLI2200 chip, and as expected did well on deinterlacing. There are three deinterlacing modes on this player, but only two are worth using: Auto 1 and Auto 2. Auto 1 uses the FLI2200 to analyze the picture cadence and make decisions about film or video mode on the fly. However, the FLI2200 doesn't have a good NTSC 2-2 pulldown mode (used for 30 fps progressive material), so to improve the performance of 2-2 material, Panasonic added Auto 2, which forces the FLI2200 into film mode when it sees a 2-2 progressive flag pattern in the MPEG stream. There is also a video mode but strangely enough if you force into video mode, DCDi™ is disabled.

Given the relative dearth of 2-2 titles in the US, Auto 2 is unlikely to add much value here. If you know that a particular title is 30 fps progressive, then it might be worth trying Auto 2, but in general we'd leave it on Auto 1. In Europe, however, 2-2 pulldown is very common, so Auto 2 might be a good default. The FLI2200 chip will auto-detect 2-2 pulldown if the source is PAL, so it might not be necessary to use Auto 2 even then. With Auto 2 the user should be watchful for combing artifacts, and switch to Auto 1 if they rear their head.

The Basics

White is actually a little low and below spec. The player is capable of reproducing below black picture information. The YC delay is longer than 5ns, which is outside of spec. The frequency response looks good.

While no lines are cropped on the top or bottom, there are 5 samples cropped from the left and 6 cropped from the right.

The layer change takes around 1.75 seconds. Not the best we have seen but not terrible. The overall response is on average and we rated that a 3. If we could choose one area for Panasonic to improve on, it would be here. We have become spoiled by the awesome response of Meridian and Denon.

All in all, not a bad player, but it is not quite up to the level set by the RP82 (or even its predecessor the RP56). However, it's a cheaper player, and readily available in more stores than the RP82. At its price point, it's a perfectly fine player.

Video Frequency Response
Panasonic

Divider

Toshiba - SD-3960

MPEG Maker: Toshiba
MPEG Model: TC90602FG
Deinterlacer Maker: Toshiba
Deinterlacer Model: TC90602FG
   
MSRP: $69.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-3960 - Film

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-3960 - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

SD-3960 - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

The Toshiba SD-3960 probably did the best of all of the players in the July, 2004 shootout. Overall I felt it was a decent player but not as solid as some other budget units out there.

The player is built on a Toshiba-based MPEG decoder that also seems to handle all of the de-interlacing functions. In the core tests, the player did pretty well, passing our blacker-than-black and video levels tests. White level came in at a respectable 101 IRE. Video frequency response was good for a budget player with only a slight dip in the upper frequency range.

The user interface is pretty good with some menus but a bit sluggish with others. This player does pass all of our chroma tests which is a first for a Toshiba player. Y/C delay is not a problem, and pixel cropping is only slight with 3 pixels clipped on each side.

As far as de-interlacing goes, Toshiba has three modes available with this player; Auto, Film, and Video. Auto and Film are identical in our tests and did a fair job. This player does okay with bad flagging but is not motion adaptive. It is also flag-based, so you will see quick recoveries during transitions from film to video.

The Video mode is completely forced and will not lock on to a Film flag at all. I wouldn’t suggest using Video mode, as the Auto mode handles video just as well.

Overall, this Toshiba is quite good as an entry player. I would have liked to have seen a motion adaptive de-interlacer but as a flag reader it did pretty well.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

Samsung - DVD-HD755

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 778
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 778
   
MSRP: $149.99
Website: http://www.samsungusa.com

DVD-HD755 (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-HD755 (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The DVD-HD755 is Samsung’s least expensive HDMI-based DVD player to date. It offers scaling to 720p and 1080i via HDMI, but lacks the support for high resolution audio formats that its upper line of players offers. This is kind of a no-frills scaling player so to speak. Its build quality is average, and its performance is almost below average compared to some of the newer budget HDMI players on the market (including some of the players featured in recent Benchmarks!).

The DVD-HD755 is centered on Zoran’s Vaddis 778 MPEG decoder, which provides most of the video processing, including de-interlacing. This is one of the newer Vaddis chips, and its performance is about the same as most of the other Vaddis line, i.e., average. The HD755 also uses the Vaddis HD Extreme scaling chip, which again does a decent job, but nothing to write home about. The only things I’ve seen with this Vaddis solution that I like more than their older chips is their improvements with chroma performance and the lack of upsampling errors.

Since this is an HDMI-based DVD player, the set-up offers the end user a selection of color space options. Older DVI-ased DVD players would only offer RBG for color space output, but HDMI supports the native color space of DVD, namely YCbCr. In the output set-up, the HD755 offers not only RGB but 4:2:0 YCbCr and 4:4:4 YCbCr. Unfortunately, this is actually false. The player outputs 4:4:4 YCbCr no matter what is selected. This was verified using a DVDO VP30 to look at the incoming color space and resolution information. I guess Samsung decided not to check for this when they started shipping. While this isn’t a huge deal, it still means the player is not performing as advertised, no matter what color space conversion is occurring (DVD is mastered at 4:2:0 YCbCr, but most, if not all MPEG decoder output 4:2:2 YCbCr).

There were some other inconsistencies with this player that I noted throughout my testing, for example, the menu button on the remote control. Normally, you press it and you are taken to the menu for the DVD playing. With this player you are taken to the set-up menu. You actually have to do a variation of keystrokes to get to the DVD menus. I haven’t the faintest clue why they did this, but manufacturers cease to amaze me lately. The remainder of the user interface was easy enough though, and overall functionality was quick and painless. Loading times for the player were short, and the player’s layer change was near seamless.

For our video testing, I started with the HDMI output. I tested at all resolutions for the normal core testing but did my de-interlacing tests at 720p. On the core side, the HDMI output had a few issues. The biggest one was clipping head and toe room. The HD755 does not pass a below-black PLUGE signal, and it is clipping above-white information. This makes it hard to properly calibrate a digital display, but it also means the player is not retaining the full dynamic range of the software playing in it. DVDs are encoded with Studio RGB levels and retain the head and toe room of the reference Sony CRT monitor they are mastered with.

Other than the video levels, the HDMI output had no real issues. This player passed all of our chroma upsampling error (CUE) tests including our 4:2:0 ICP test. The Vaddis chip is performing filtering of the chroma information, so some chroma resolution is lost. This is similar to what Faroudja-based players have done for years. Whether or not this is noticeable to the end user is debatable. The HDMI output has no signs of Y/C delay and is not clipping any active pixels in the image.

The component output is about the same, except it is not clipping the video levels. The component output supports below-black and above-white information, and the white level is properly output at 100 IRE. I didn’t see any pixel cropping at 480p, but the component outputs do suffer from over a full pixel of Y/C delay, which creates some “haloing” effects around objects. There are no adjustments for this in the player’s picture adjustments.

The analog video frequency response was decent, but not perfect. The upper frequency range just passed our criteria, but was down nearly 2 dB in the upper range. This results in a slightly softer image since fine detail is not fully resolved. Adjusting the sharpness in the player’s set-up only made things worse.

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, the HD755 did about as well as I expected. I’ve tested players that use the Vaddis chip before, and the results are usually always the same. This player is not motion adaptive, so it is not a good choice for video based DVDs. Line twitter will be quite noticeable, and the image will normally be a lot softer than motion adaptive DVD players. The HD755 also does a poor job with diagonal lines in video based material.

For film based DVDs, the HD755 is average at best. It is flag-based, so it trips up with just about any break in cadence or bad flagging. This results in frequent combing and drops to video mode, which makes the image softer. The Vaddis chip does support a 2-2 cadence though, which is nice for some video material. Other than standard well-mastered 3-2 material though, this player is not a good option for progressive scan playback.

Conclusions

The Samsung DVD-HD755 is a rather lackluster player that doesn’t really perform up to snuff with most of the other HDMI-based players at this price point. Its video processing is average to below average, and its core section could use some fine-tuning. There are other options at this price point that have more features, and better overall video performance. If you searching for a budget HDMI based player, I would recommend looking elsewhere.

Video Frequency Response
Samsung

Divider

Oritron - DVD 4119

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 6
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 6
   
MSRP: $39.99
Website: www.oritron.com

DVD 4119 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The Oritron DVD 4119 can be bought for less then $50. It is essentially a drive and a small PC board wrapped in a diminutive shell similar to the Cyberhome players you see at Wal-Mart and Best Buy. Overall performance is a bit below average for a DVD player, but I wasn’t expecting a lot at this price point.

The 4119 is based entirely on the Zoran Vaddis 6 MPEG decoder. This chip does all of the video and audio processing for the player, including de-interlacing duties. This is one of the cheaper Zoran chips and doesn’t perform at the level of the Vaddis 5 or 778 which seem to be a bit more popular amongst manufacturers.

This player is not motion adaptive, which I consider a deal breaker with any progressive scan player. At this point in the game, all DVD players should pass the test, even at $50. It did reasonably well with film-based cadences, but any break in cadence or bad flag resulted in obvious combing. The player does recovery pretty quickly though, so this shouldn’t be a huge distraction.

Like most flag-based players, the 4119 handles a 2-2 cadence pretty well. This is great for video material. But when I watched some video-based material, jaggies were clearly evident with horizontal lines. This was also extremely evident using the 3 line test on the Silicon Image test disc. Those of you who like to watch DVDs of TV shows may want to look around some more if you don’t like a jagged image.

The core performance of the player was decent but not great. Pixel cropping was a bit extreme on the right side of the image with 8 pixels cropped, but no other sides had any cropping. The player has no signs of Y/C delay, and its video frequency response was only a bit down in the higher frequencies. This contributed to a slightly softer image than with higher line players. It does pass a below-black pluge pattern, and its white level is at a respectable 101 IRE.

On the interface side, this player did about average in terms of speed. Menu navigation and chapter skips were quick, but not blazing, and the layer change clocked in at around 1.5 seconds.

The player did quite well in our chroma tests, and this was probably the most impressive aspect of its performance. Even with our 4:2:0 ICP test, it did not show any signs of the infamous CUE problem. There was no banding or jagged edges at all on our fish tests using the Microsoft WHQL 3.0 test disc. Zoran has made great strides in this department with both the Vaddis 6 and Vaddis 778 chips.

Summary: In the realm of under $50 players, the Oritron DVD 4119 fits in with the rest of the pack. Its video performance is average at best, and generally not too bad. If you are on a tight budget, you might prefer a Mediatek-based budget player, but this one would still be OK.

Video Frequency Response
Oritron

Divider

V. Inc - Bravo D1 - DVI

MPEG Maker: Sigma
MPEG Model: EM-8500
Deinterlacer Maker: Sigma
Deinterlacer Model: EM-8500
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.vinc.us/

Bravo D1 - DVI - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

Important note: The pass/fail scores for this player only apply to the DVI output. As you'll see from the testing notes, the analog output has serious issues, and thus we can only recommend this player if it's connected to the display via DVI.

Deinterlacing

This player uses the new Sigma Designs all-in-one chip, which has basic flag-only film detection, combined with a simple vertical filter for video mode deinterlacing. As with all chips of this type, it works well on film-based content when the flags are standard, but when the flags are non-standard or the content is not from a film or other progressive source, the image is much softer than it needs to be. In the worst cases, when the progressive flag is set to "true" improperly, the player will comb constantly. Its resistance to bad edits was poor, with 5 total combs in the Big Lebowski montage.

On the plus side, it handles the common "alternating progressive flag" encoding problem well, correctly treating it as progressive content.

The Basics

Black level on the analog output is incorrect at 7.6 IRE instead of the standard 0 IRE. There is no switch we could find to adjust it to 0 IRE black. White level is low, at 97.3 IRE, which was too low to pass. Both Y-Pb and Y-Pr have delay greater than the EIA standard of 5ns, again only on the analog output. The player does pass blacker-than-black in progressive mode, though we should note that because the player only does 7.5 IRE black, we were unable to check blacker-than-black at 0 IRE.

The video frequency response on the analog output of this player is astonishingly rolled off, actually down a whopping 13 dB at 10 MHz. Considering that DVD goes all the way to 13.5 MHz, that's pretty bad. The rolloff was consistent even in the higher resolutions. Through the DVI connection, of course, there is no rolloff.

There are 0 video lines cropped from the top and bottom, and 0 video samples on the left and right, which is excellent.

The layer change is fast, at around 0.5 seconds, and responsiveness was 2.5, which is about average.

The scaling and DVI features of this player are what people are buying it for, and those features work well, as long as you use them together. The analog outputs have too many problems for us to recommend the player for use via an analog connection, but through a DVI connection the clarity is just stellar, with no chroma delay and no rolloff. The scaling engine in the player is excellent, producing clean output with no obvious jaggies or moire even on difficult material like the Avia resolution patterns.

The player is not without its quirks, however. In our limited time working with it, we found that while it has a zoom that is useful for zooming in on non-anamorphic letterboxed discs, the zoom snaps back to normal when you hit the chapter next button, and the subtitles turn off while it's zoomed in. These are clearly firmware quirks, and perhaps can be corrected, but they are nevertheless annoying.

Another minor issue is that the player always window-boxes 4:3 discs for you, even if your display has aspect ratio controls of its own. This is non-optimal for people with digital displays, as they often only sample 720 times across a scan line when taking in 480p content. With the window-box bars on, there are more than 720 sample intervals across the screen, and thus picture information gets lost. You can clearly see this on our Sony VW10HT test projector. We put the player in 16x9 mode, then viewed a 4x3-encoded resolution chart. Three fourths of the horizontal resolution was lost because the projector wasn't sampling more than what it thought it "needed" to do to capture the full 480p signal. If we put the player in 4x3 mode so it wouldn't add the window-box bars, then window-boxed using the display's aspect controls, the full resolution was visible. The player could really use a mode where it doesn't try to do any aspect control of its own, for people who have a display that can do a better job of aspect control than the player can. This is not an issue when using the DVI output.

Finally, we noted that when the player is in 16x9 mode, whenever subpictures (like menus and subtitles) are displayed on screen for 4x3 content they look very odd, like they've been scaled using a simplistic algorithm. The effect is jarring. The menus on Avia are a good example of this phenomenon because Avia contains both 4x3 and 16x9 menus. Put the player in 4x3 mode, and the effect disappears. We have seen similar behavior on other DVD players.

In the end, while we are impressed with the clarity that DVI brings, we're not ready to lose the excellent deinterlacing of the best chipsets in order to get it, and we weren't happy with the interface quirks mentioned above. For those who just want an inexpensive way to feed a digital display with a DVI connection and aren't as picky about deinterlacing and quirky UI, the Bravo D1 may well fit the bill.

Divider

Sony - DVP-NS775V

MPEG Maker: Sony
MPEG Model: CXD9804R
Deinterlacer Maker: Sony
Deinterlacer Model: CXD9804R
   
MSRP: $129.99
Website: http://www.sony.com

DVP-NS775V - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

DVP-NS775V - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags

First off we’d like to give a huge thanks to Derek Smith for giving us the opportunity to test this player. Derek graciously volunteered his player and even came over when I did the tests.

The Sony DVP-NS775V is a mid to lower line entry from Sony that doesn’t have many bells and whistles other than support for SACD playback. The 775 is built on a Sony platform all in one video chip that handles both MPEG decoding and de-interlacing for progressive playback. Like the last few Sony players I’ve tested, this one shows that Sony has come quite a way over the last few years in terms of video performance. I look forward to trying out their new flagship ES players that are due out later this year.

The Sony video processing is in line with most standard players on the market right now. It handles film cadences quite well but will occasionally trip up when that cadence changes. So with the majority of film DVDs out there, this player should do fine in the de-interlacing department. It does lack a mode for DVDs using a 2-2 cadence though, so video performance may vary.

Equally important to video processing is the player’s core performance. This is the building block to a great picture. Keep in mind that most displays nowadays contain some pretty advanced video processing, including scaling and de-interlacing. Sometimes it is more beneficial to rely on that processing instead of the player’s own processing. But a player’s core component performance is critical so that the display’s processing has the best signal possible to work with.

The 775 fared okay in these tests but could be improved upon. The most glaring issue was Y/C delay. Using a bowtie pattern on Video Essentials and our digital oscilloscope, we measured greater than a full pixel of Y/C delay on both the Pb and Pr channels. Y/C delay will cause a “ghosting” effect on the image that almost looks like a halo on the side of the delay. It is essential that the luminance and chroma channels are perfectly in sync with each other to provide the best video image.

The video frequency response of the player was excellent and just about ruler flat. I did spot some pixel cropping on the left and right side of the image with a total of 7 pixels being cropped. The player did extremely well with our chroma tests. The only one it didn’t pass was the 4:2:0 ICP test which requires a chroma filter that is normally only found in high end video processors.

The player did pass the below-black pluge pattern test, but its white level was a bit high at 103 IRE. This will exaggerate white levels and produce an artificially high contrast level.

The user interface was simple to navigate, and response times were quite good. I thought the initial loading times were on the sluggish side, but menu navigation and chapter skips were quite speedy. Using a full bit rate layer change, we measured the delay at about 0.75 second, which is excellent.

Overall, the Sony is a decent entry level player, but a bit more attention to detail would have gone a long way. It surprises me that so many companies seem to drop the ball on the easy stuff this late in the game. I hope that the next offerings from Sony that are due out later this year are tweaked in a bit better.

Video Frequency Response
Sony

Divider

Toshiba - SD-4960

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 778
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 778
   
MSRP: $129.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-4960 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Video Levels
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

Toshiba ventures into the Universal player market with their first single disc universal offering, the SD-4960. At only $129.99, this is one of the lowest priced universal offerings I’ve seen to date.

The 4960 is based on the Zoran Vaddis 778 MPEG decoder and uses this chip for all its video processing duties. There are plenty of players out there that use the Zoran chips, but we have found that their quality varies substantially with each different model. The 778 chip didn’t do near as well as the Vaddis 5 does, which is the preferred Zoran chip.

This player is not motion adaptive, which at this point in the game is a must for a progressive scan DVD player. This player will drops into video mode with any flag issue and combing is quite evident. If the DVD is flagged correctly (which most aren’t), artifacts will be few and far between and the image should look quite good.

This chip does have an advantage over the Vaddis 5 though, better chroma filtering. This player did a superb job with almost all of our chroma tests and even passed the 4:2:0 ICP test. With normal 3-2 based material, there was a slight amount of jaggedness around the edges, so I gave it a borderline score for that test. The MPEG decoder did an excellent job synching the subtitles to the video frames and didn’t show any signs of combing.

The analog stage of this player was pretty good. There was no Y/C delay at all using Video Essentials Bowtie pattern and the overall frequency response of the player was decent, with only a very slight roll off in the upper frequencies.

Navigating menus was quick and painless and chapter skips were decent. I clocked the layer change in at about 1 second, which is respectable.

This player does pass a below-black pluge pattern but its white level is set a tad high at 103 IRE. This gives the image a rather exaggerated look in contrast levels.

This player does support DVD Audio and SA-CD and offers a single crossover point and level adjustments for each channel. It does not offer time alignment though, which is crucial for proper multi-channel audio playback.

Overall this is a decent entry for Toshiba, especially given the price point. I wish they would have gone with a slightly better MPEG decoder and video processor though.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

Pioneer - DV-563a

MPEG Maker: Unknown
MPEG Model: Unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Pioneer
Deinterlacer Model: Unknown
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com

DV-563a - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Layer Change
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Video Levels
YC Delay

The DV-563a is Pioneer’s first budget player to offer progressive scan, DVD-A and SACD support in one unit. Since the 563a can be found on the Internet well under $200, it has become a bit of a hot product lately. While it is a decent offering in some respects, it has a way to go before outdoing the better offerings out there and is not the stellar budget player solution that the older Panasonics had become. Pioneer has switched MPEG decoders recently, ridding their players of the Chroma Upsampling Error (CUE) problem. The new decoder has no signs of the bug on it.

The 563 also features Pioneer’s “Pure Progressive Cinema” denterlacing solution, but it is not implemented as well as their Elite line and lacks the user options to dial it in. The player was unable to pass our pixel cropping and layer change tests. It cropped two full pixels on the top, bottom, and left side, plus another five pixels off the right. Using our full bitrate layer change test, the player was a bit sluggish at two seconds.

The audio section is what I expected out of a player in this range. While most will probably be satisfied, it doesn’t come near the performance and detail of higher end offerings. The bass management is quite limited with a fixed 100 Hz crossover which leaves a bit to be desired. While it is hard to compare this player to some of the others in this shootout, given its price point, it is a decent option for those not looking to break the bank.

Divider

Panasonic - DVD-S52

MPEG Maker: MEI
MPEG Model: Unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Unknown
Deinterlacer Model: Unknown
   
MSRP: $99.95
Website: http://www.panasonic.com

DVD-S52 (HDMI) - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S52 (HDMI) - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S52 (Component) - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S52 (Component) - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S52 (HDMI) - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S52 (Component) - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

The DVD-S52 is one of the least expensive HDMI-based DVD players I’ve tested to date. At this price you wouldn’t expect much in terms of features, but Panasonic delivers a decent package of options here for the budget minded consumer. Not only does it offer an HDMI output, but this output is HDMI v1.1 compliant, and the player supports full playback of DVD-Audio. This means you can use one cable to deliver both standard DVD video and audio plus high-resolution PCM audio from DVD-Audio software. The player also supports upscaling of DVD via HDMI to 720p and 1080i. While this isn’t the first time Panasonic has offered these features to the consumer market, it has never been quite this inexpensive.

The S52 is based on a Matsushita (Panasonic) MPEG decoder. I did not see any other video processing chips when I opened the player up, and the video performance doesn’t suggest that Panasonic is using any. In the past we’ve been big fans of Panasonic’s MPEG decoders. In fact, the Panasonic MPEG decoders found in the RP-91 and RP-82 continue to be our standard to this day. Those players are over 5 years old now! This new chip does not live up to that same standard, unfortunately. The implementation on the digital side is good, but the analog output of the chip needs quite a bit of work.

I started my tests with the HDMI output. I fed a Panasonic AE-900 LCD projector directly and also put a DVDO VP30 in between for some of the tests. The VP30 allows me to verify the output color space of the player plus do some more extensive CUE testing.

The core performance on the HDMI side was quite good. The S52 is not cropping any pixels via HDMI and retains the full dynamic range of the luma signal. It does not clip below black or above white information in the image. The player also doesn’t have any signs of Y/C delay via HDMI, which helps with the overall sharpness of the image.

The S52 does suffer from some slight flickering in our CUE testing with alternating 3-2 cadence based material. This cadence is common in some of the early Pixar and Disney DVDs and can be noticeable at times. All of the other CUE tests were passed, including the 4:2:0 ICP test which means this player does some chroma filtering.

The core performance of the component (analog) outputs was completely different and not nearly as good. There is some mild pixel cropping with 2 pixels missing from the left side and 3 from the right, and there is over a full pixel of Y/C delay. All NTSC video is transmitted with both black and white (luma) and color information (chroma) placed on top of each other. They are separate and distinct signals, and if they are not overlaid exactly on top of each other, you will see outlining or “ghosting” around the image on one side. This player delays the chroma, so you will probably see a faint outline on the right side of objects.

The overall white level of the analog output was also extremely low. Using a horizontal gray ramp and a digital oscilloscope I measured the full IRE sweep of the player from 0 to 100 IRE. If the player’s output were correct, the respective 0 and 100 IRE points would measure as such on the scope. In this case the 100 IRE point measured REALLY low and came in at 91 IRE.

The analog frequency response of the player was good, with a fairly flat curve throughout the full video bandwidth.

From a usability standpoint, the Panasonic was about average. Menu navigation and chapter skipping were quick enough and never distracting. Disc load times were also good. The layer change was a tad sluggish at 1.5 seconds, but livable given the price point. I wasn’t that impressed with the advanced setup menus. Settings for HDMI output and de-interlacing mode were a bit hidden, so some users may have difficulty finding them. The normal setup menus were easy to use though.

I would have liked to see more attention to detail on the analog side of this player, especially since the HDMI (digital) output was so good.

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, the S52 starts to show the limitations of one-chip mass-market MPEG decoders. The S52 offers three separate de-interlacing modes; Auto 1, Auto 2, and Video. Video is a forced video mode that will not lock onto any cadences or switch into a film mode. This results in a much softer image than the Auto modes but will result in very little, if any, combing. The only real difference between Auto 1 and Auto 2 was the latter’s ability to lock on to a 2-2 cadence correctly. This is only important though if you know you are going to watch material mastered with this cadence. Some TV based DVDs use this. Otherwise, we would suggest just sticking with Auto 1 (default), as it handles most of the film-based cadences.

The S52 does not handle breaks in cadence or mixed cadences very well at all. It is also not motion-adaptive, so it will not handle video-based material very well. This pretty much defines the bottom end of video de-interlacing in mass-market progressive scan players. Even our medium difficulty tests tripped this player up, resulting in drops to video mode and loss of overall resolution. It did perform nicely at recovery from video to film mode as cadences changed. At this price point I wasn’t expecting much better, but I hoped that Panasonic delivered performance closer to their players that cost just a little bit more.

Conclusions

It would be hard for me to recommend this player to anyone. The video processing is on the weak side and will result in a softer image with poorly mastered material. I was impressed with the feature set considering the price point, but that doesn’t make up for the other issues. For those using component inputs, you should steer clear of this player, as its core performance using that output needs a lot of work and there is a lot better to be found in this price range.

Video Frequency Response
Panasonic

Divider

Pioneer - DV-490V-S

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: MT1389FE
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: MT1389FE
   
MSRP: $99.00
Website: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com

DV-490V-S (Component) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

DV-490V-S (HDMI) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

The Pioneer DV-490V represents Pioneer’s cheapest HDMI DVD player to date. For less than $100 you get a fully digital transport for your DVDs. Pretty cool. Of course for this low cost, Pioneer has stripped off a few of the features that we’ve become accustomed to with their lower priced players lately like SACD and DVD-Audio, but this is still a very affordable expenditure for a bedroom or den player.

The 490V is based on the Mediatek MPEG decoder and all-in-one video-processing chip. This is not the first time Pioneer has included this chip in its DVD players; the 588 and 578 universal players both used this same chip. What has bugged me about this is the “Pure Cinema Progressive” logo on the front panel of these players. This logo is Pioneer’s label for their proprietary de-interlacing solution so common in their Elite line. So as an average consumer, you may think you are getting the performance of the upper line, but this is just not the case. I don’t mind a “progressive” moniker, but I think in this case it's a bit misleading.

The Mediatek chip is a great MPEG decoder but not really the best video-processing chip. The scaling is decent, but not outstanding. I see a bit of softness and haloing with a multi-burst pattern, but thankfully my motion patterns are free of moiré. Seeing moiré is a sure sign that something is wrong with the scaling. The de-interlacing performance is in line with the majority of Mediatek based players, though not quite as dialed in as some other models, like the DV-588a. The DV-490V also has some issues in the core video department that really don’t need to be there. I’ve tested enough Mediatek players to know that this chip is capable of passing some of these tests if it is implemented properly. This all goes back to the attention to detail thing that seems to be an issue with many DVD players lately.

I started my tests with the component video output for our core video evaluation. Using a multiburst pattern, I evaluated the analog video frequency response. The results were quite good, with the player coming in almost ruler flat across the whole frequency spectrum. After that, things got pretty rough. This player suffers from over a full pixel of Y/C delay, which created some artificial ringing. The default white level is also a bit low at 97 IRE. There is excessive pixel cropping with at least 10 pixels cropped from any one side. Other than frequency response the only good thing I could find on the core side for component video was its ability to pass a below-black pluge.

The HDMI side was actually worse! This player clips below-black but retains above-white information. That is definitely a first. I have no idea why a player would do this, or even how they are doing it, but they did it. The HDMI output also has over a full pixel of Y/C delay and is cropping more than 10 pixels from any one side, regardless of the output resolution selected. I also noticed that the overlays would not line up appropriately in some menus during my evaluation.

The core performance of a player is crucial to the overall quality. These things should really be non-issues at this point in the game because they are not things that are dependent on the price. The specifications for DVD video playback have been clearly established for a long time, but it just seems like players are getting worse before they are getting better, and it doesn’t even matter what price category they are in.

The HDMI output supports 480i, 480p, 720p, and 1080i. Normally, I would be really excited to see a sub-$100 player with a 480i output via HDMI, but since the core performance of this player takes it out of contention for a digital transport, 480i is not a big deal. As with all Mediatek players, the chroma performance of the 490V is outstanding, with only our 4:2:0 ICP test throwing it off. The Mediatek shows some pretty bad stripping with motion during that test.

Moving on to our de-interlacing tests, this player did average for its price point and MPEG decoder. Every Mediatek player I’ve tested so far has failed the same tests, and this is no exception. The chip does not handle cadence breaks very well and failed our Mixed Flag and Video Flag tests. The player also failed our Bad Edits test, which is not always the case for this chip. I don’t know what would need to be adjusted to pass this test, but Pioneer did pass it with the DV-588a. The 490V did pass our normal 3-2 and 2-2 test though, so the majority of video content will play back with no real issues.

One of the benefits of this chip is its diagonal line processing. The Mediatek chip is the only all-in-one solution I know of that does diagonal line filtering like Faroudja’s DCDi technology. I used the “3 Angles” test on the HQV Benchmark DVD to evaluate the performance, and the Mediatek did a commendable job. It only had issues with the extreme corners for the most part. For viewers that watch a lot of video-based content and aren’t looking to spend the money for a high line video processor with diagonal line processing, search out a good Mediatek player and you should be fine.

Conclusions

The Pioneer DV-490V is just not a DVD player I can recommend. While the video processing is above average for its price point, the core video performance needs a lot of work. Thankfully most of these issues could be resolved with some minor tweaking and a firmware update, but whether this will happen is the issue. If you are searching for a budget DVD player with HDMI output, this one does not need to be on your list.

Video Frequency Response
Pioneer

Divider

Pioneer - DV-393-S

MPEG Maker: Mediatek
MPEG Model: MT1389FE
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediatek
Deinterlacer Model: MT1389FE
   
MSRP: $79.00
Website: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com

DV-393-S - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit

The DV-393 (the -S at the end of the model number just means it is the silver version vs. the black version) is the less expensive sibling to Pioneer’s new budget HDMI player, the DV-490V. Everything is exactly the same between these two players with the exception of the HDMI output on the 490V. Since the price difference is about $20, I would have to recommend the 490V. While your display may not have an HDMI input right now, later down the line, you will buy a display with HDMI, because they all will have them, and you will probably want to go the digital route at that time.

The DV-393 is one of the least expensive Pioneer DVD players I’ve reviewed to date. It is nice to see some of the more established manufacturers release products at this price point, but it seems like this model has a lot of issues compared to Pioneer’s normal offerings. This was also the case with the DV-490V.

The biggest issue with this player is its core video performance. There is just way too much amiss here, and this is the most important aspect of a DVD player’s performance. Consider it the framework. You can have the best video processing and de-interlacing on the market, but if the framework around it doesn't perform well, then it doesn’t matter.

The DV-393 has a lot of issues in this regard. First off, the player is clipping an excessive amount of pixels from every side of the image. This means part of the image is literally not getting to the end display. We measured over 10 pixels on any one side, which is way outside of the normal range we see with most DVD players. The next problem is Y/C delay. NTSC video is comprised of Luma (black and white) and Chroma (color) information overlaid on each other to create the picture you watch on the screen. These two separate signals need to be superimposed on top of each other perfectly. If it doesn't, then you essentially get convergence issues, similar to what you find with older CRT displays. This creates a softer image, plus outlining on one side of objects.

Next up was the white level of the player. A pure white signal should measure out at 100 IRE. For this test we use a grayscale ramp and a digital oscilloscope. The white output for this player measured in at 97 IRE, which is just below our passing criteria.

The DV-393 did do well with some of our other tests though. The player does pass a below black pluge, and its chroma performance is very commendable. The Mediatek MPEG decoder used always does very well in this department, and the 393 sailed through our CUE tests, failing only our 4:2:0 ICP test. The Mediatek chip cannot keep the CUE issue at bay with motion during this test, and you will see stripping with some material. The video frequency response of this player is also quite good and nearly ruler flat.

The component output only supports 480i and 480p like most analog-based progressive DVD players. All of my tests were done at 480p. The Mediatek chip’s performance was exactly the same as its higher priced sibling, the 490V. The chip passed all of our tests with the exception of the 3-2 Mixed Flags and 3-2 Video tests. It also failed our Bad Edit test with some slight combing using both our Big Lebowski clip and a test clip from Faroudja.

From a usability standpoint, this player is quite good. The Mediatek chip is known for its speed in navigation as well as its quick load times, and the 393 didn’t disappoint. Menu navigation and chapter skips were zippy, with no hitches to speak of. The layer change was not quite seamless, but with only the briefest hiccup using our high bit rate scroll test. Just blink and you’ll miss it!!

Conclusions

The DV-393 is an average to below-average progressive scan DVD player. At this price point, I wasn’t expecting much, but with just a bit more attention to detail, this could have been a really great value overall. Too many DVD player manufacturers are losing sight of what makes a quality picture and keep messing up the core performance that is so important. The DV-393 is no exception. While I don’t think people can expect much at this price point, I think they should expect better than this. In fact, they should insist on it.

Video Frequency Response
Pioneer

Divider

Coby - DVD-515

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 6
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 6
   
MSRP: $59.99
Website: www.cobyusa.com

DVD-515 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

I had never even heard of the company Coby before this review. Turns out they have quite a few DVD players on the market at really low prices. I picked up the DVD-515 for the Benchmark. This is a very cut and dried player, but it did feature an onboard Dolby and DTS decoder with 5.1 analog outputs, which was a bit surprising at this price point.

The 515 is based on the Zoran Vaddis 6, similar to the Cyberhome 300. Like the Cyberhome, the core performance was a bit of a mixed bag. The player passes blacker-than-black, but the white level is a tad low at 96 IRE. The video requency response is rolled off in the upper end, contributing to a softer image where fine detail is concerned.

The Coby suffers from excessive pixel cropping, with 9 pixels chopped from the left side of the image. The user interface is very sluggish in both menus and chapter skips, and the remote is terrible. The disc loader is also very picky, and at times I had to load test discs 3-4 times to get them to play.

One of the bright sides of the Vaddis 6 is its PAL-to-NTSC conversion. If one knew how to make this player region free, it could have been a decent choice. However, its de-interlacing capabilities are average at best. It's also not motion adaptive and tends to trip up a lot with bad flagging.

I would have to pass on this one. The core performance is poor, and it doesn’t make up for these problems with its progressive performance.

Video Frequency Response
Coby

Divider

Daewoo - DVN-8100N

MPEG Maker: Media Tech
MPEG Model: MT1379EE
Deinterlacer Maker: Media Tech
Deinterlacer Model: MT1379EE
   
MSRP: $69.99
Website: http://www.e-daewoo.com/

DVN-8100N - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

Yes Daewoo!! Guess everyone is trying to make DVD players these days. Wonder if Honda or Ford will be next!

This is another Media Tech player, but like the others, it has its share of shortcomings. The player fails the blacker-than-black test as well as the Y/C delay test but did fairly well with the other core testing. White level was a respectable 101 IRE, and the video frequency response didn’t have the trademark roll-off like the other players in this benchmark. Pixel cropping was a tad excessive, with 7 combined pixels missing from the right and left side and 3 from the top.

On the plus side, like the other Media Tech players, this transport is extremely fast, but not as fast as some of the others. Menus were speedy but not blinding like the Vivo Vision. The layer change also hiccupped slightly at about 0.25 seconds. This was the only player of the bunch that offered HDCD decoding which I thought was a nice touch for a bargain player.

Another high point of the Media Tech chip is its PAL-to-NTSC conversion which is excellent. I tested this using the PAL edition of Digital Video Essentials. I didn’t notice any distracting artifacts at all when the player converted the picture to NTSC for my display.

On the de-interlacing side, this player faired quite well. This chip is designed to be motion adaptive, but unfortunately, unlike the Vivo Vision, it is not cadence-based. But that didn’t seem to hurt it since it did well even with poorly flagged material like The Big Lebowski and our Galaxy Quest test.

The Daewoo was easily one of the most solid players in the July Benchmark. It could have used a bit more tweaking, but if you need HDCD and PAL-to-NTSC conversion at a budget price, this one is a pretty good choice.

Video Frequency Response
Daewoo

Divider

Pioneer - DV-578a

MPEG Maker: Media Tech
MPEG Model: MT1389EE
Deinterlacer Maker: Media Tech
Deinterlacer Model: MT1389EE
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.pioneerelectronics.com

DV-578a - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit

The Pioneer 578a is the successor to the previously tested 563a. This is Pioneer’s entry level universal player and represents a solid value in the market today. This new player has quite a few differences from its predecessor, including a completely different MPEG decoder and de-interlacing solution.

The 578 uses the Mediatek all-in-one MPEG decoder solution. This chip has some great strong points to it, including being extremely fast in its functionality. This can be seen in both the user interface and layer change of the player. This is the first Pioneer player to have a completely seamless layer change and extremely fast menu and chapter navigation.

This chip also excels at its PAL to NTSC conversion, which is excellent. I went through a lot of the demo material on the PAL edition of the Digital Video Essentials disc and there wasn’t a trace of artifacts or improper timing. If this player could be made region free, it would be an excellent offering for those with monitors that only accept NTSC.

On the de-interlacing side, this chip did fairly well. I have tested quite a few players this past week that utilize this same chip, and every one of them tested slightly different, meaning that player manufacturers should take great care with their implementation. I think that if Pioneer would have paid a bit more attention, this player could have walked away with a killer score in our Benchmark. This brings up another point: The player’s front face plate has a “Pure Cinema Progressive” logo on it, but this is not the Pioneer de-interlacing solution.

For out core tests, the player did okay with a few shortcomings. The player will not pass a below black signal and has over 1 pixel of Y/C delay. There is some minor pixel cropping with 5 pixels dropped from the right side and 2 from the left along with 1 from the bottom of the image. This MPEG decoder does show the CUE problems in all our tests except for 2-2 material, but like the Faroudja solution it masks the CUE in progressive mode. White level is at a respectable 99 IRE and again this player is lightning fast.

On the audio side, this seems to be exactly the same as the 563 in terms of setup limitations. The manual doesn’t state what the crossover setting is for bass management, but rather only that speakers with drivers less then 12” should be set to small. It also groups its audio delay for each section (mains, surrounds), and the center and surrounds are limited to a 0 to 3’ difference from the mains.

Overall, this is still a great bargain as an entry level universal player. If it could be modded to Region-Free it would be an excellent solution for those with NTSC-only displays. I hope in the future though that Pioneer incorporates its own de-interlacing solution with this new MPEG decoder or tweaks it in a bit more.

Video Frequency Response
Pioneer

Divider

Panasonic - DVD-S29

MPEG Maker: Matsushita
MPEG Model: MN2DS0003UP1
Deinterlacer Maker: Matsushita
Deinterlacer Model: MN2DS0003UP1
   
MSRP: $69.00
Website: http://www.panasonic.com

DVD-S29 - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S29 - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S29 - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

The Panasonic DVD-S29 is one of Panasonic’s newest entry level players. The design is simple but maintains a few of the cosmetic touches of their somewhat pricier upper tier. A few years ago Panasonic was at the top of our DVD Benchmark ratings and they released a string of affordable DVD players that offered superb video playback; unfortunately those days have come to an end. While the upper tier of Panasonic players such as the DVD-S97 and S77 offer excellent video performance for the price, the S29 groups itself into the mainstream norm of average-at-best players.

The S29 uses a proprietary Matsushita MPEG decoder. This single chip is the heart of the player and performs all of the video processing duties as well as audio decoding. Like most one-chip solutions, the Matsushita offering is decent enough with film based DVDs, but lacks the more advanced video processing that is demanded by today’s DVDs.

De-Interlacing

The S29 features three separate de-interlacing modes; Auto 1, Auto 2, and Video. This is pretty common with Panasonic designs, and the results are nearly always the same with this chipset. Auto 1 is essentially a film based mode and lacks the capability to deal with a 2-2 based video cadence. So, if you don’t find yourself watching a lot of TV shows now available on DVD, you may just want to stick with this mode. Auto 2 is exactly the same, except that it features 2-2 processing. I didn’t see any signs of compromise with film based material (at least compared to Auto 1), so this is a safe mode to leave the player in if you want. Last and definitely least is Video which I found essentially useless for the most part. No flag or cadence detection at all. Since Auto 2 deals with video based material just fine, I would recommend sticking with that.

This player had quite a bit of difficulty with cadence errors and was quick to drop into video mode. This resulted in lots of combing during our tests. This is pretty much the norm on the market today despite the decade of DVD technologies that have been developed. It seems that the consumers just don't demand enough from the manufacturers, so why should they bother spending money to fix problems?

Core Performance

Unfortunately, this is where most players come up short. Since typical video processing chips will handle a basic film cadence for I/P conversion, most of the deficiencies you see in DVD players today are from problems in the core areas of video playback. This includes Y/C delay, video levels, chroma up-sampling errors, and more. The DVD-S29 again did about average in this department, but had some major oversights in my opinion.

The biggest oversight is the default level of white in the video signal. Our pass criteria is a level of 102 IRE or lower, with 100 IRE being the ideal. The S29’s white level is 110 IRE as measured with our oscilloscope. That is outrageously high. The Panasonic does have picture settings that will help out, but this shouldn’t be an issue that the consumer has to deal with. On the plus side, the S29 does pass a below black pluge signal and the black level of the player can be adjusted for both 7.5 and 0 IRE.

There was some slight Y/C delay measured, but the player was still in the consumer spec of less then 5 ns. When I evaluated the player on my display, I didn’t see any trace of the Y/C delay in normal viewing. The Panasonic had a very good overall video frequency response that remained flat for the most part with only a slight nudge down in the mid-frequency band. Using a resolution chart on AVIA Pro showed that the S29 did indeed resolve the highest resolution DVD was capable of.

Like most DVD players, the S29 did have issues with a few of our chroma up-sampling tests, i.e., the 4:2:0 ICP test, which requires special chroma filters to resolve, and the 3-2 alternating cadence CUE problem. Both of these are very common but won’t show up on a lot of material you will see in real world viewing. The 3-2 alternating problem will show up occasionally on some of Disney’s animated DVD fare.

Pixel cropping was a tad excessive on the left and right sides of the image, mainly the right which was clipping 5 pixels from the video signal. Since the S29 doesn’t use any chroma filtering, the player retains the full vertical chroma response.

Usability of the player is high. Response times were high and menu navigation and chapter skips were breezy enough. The player’s layer change clocked in right about 1 second which is decent. I wasn’t impressed with the overall build of the player; especially the tray, which seemed a bit flimsy.

Conclusions

Overall the S29 is what I would expect from a player in this price range and really doesn’t set itself apart in any significant way. Panasonic would be wise to try and bring back the good old days. They certainly have the capability. Just do it!

Video Frequency Response
Panasonic

Divider

CyberHome - CH-DVD300S

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 6
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 6
   
MSRP: $39.99
Website: http://www.cyberhome.com

CH-DVD300S - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive

At 40 bucks, the Cyberhome DVD-300 is about as entry level as it gets for DVD. The player is literally a transport and tiny power supply wrapped in a shell that is just big enough for it. This thing is very small, and so is the price tag. My parents bought this player for less then $40 from Best Buy for their camper. I spotted it at their house and asked if I could borrow it for a few days to do my tests on it.

I was a bit surprised when I opened up the chassis. The MPEG decoder used is the Zoran Vaddis 6. For those familiar with Zoran decoding solutions, you may recall that Zoran is used in the high line of Arcam players. But don’t get confused, the Vaddis 6 is different than the Vaddis 5 used in the Arcam players and represents the budget line of the Zoran chips, along with the Vaddis 7.

The core section of the player did okay given its price point, but isn’t really anything to call home about. The player passes blacker-than-black, but falls short in the video level department with a peak white of 95 IRE. The video frequency response is a tad rolled off in the upper end, but not nearly as much as some other players I have tested that cost quite a bit more than this. Pixel cropping was decent except for the left side which clips 8 pixels. Y/C delay was perfect with no signs of delay at all.

The Vaddis 6 appears to pass all of the CUE tests with the exception of the ICP test, which is as expected. I don’t know why Zoran got it right on this chip since both the 5 and 7 series have CUE issues, although VERY minor.

As a de-interlacing engine, the Vaddis 6 is not up to par with its brother the Vaddis 5. For one thing, it isn’t motion adaptive. It is also flag-based and tends to trip up quite easily with bad flagging. But considering its price point, this player’s performance still beat out a lot of players at several times its cost. I guess this is truly one of those reviews where I can put the infamous phrase, “Better than players costing over twice as much!!!!”

Video Frequency Response
CyberHome

Divider

JVC - XV-N420B

MPEG Maker: ESS
MPEG Model: Vibratto II CL
Deinterlacer Maker: ESS
Deinterlacer Model: Vibratto II CL
   
MSRP: $89.95
Website: http://www.jvc.com/main.jsp

XV-N420B - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

JVC hasn’t been much of a factor in the DVD market in the last few years. They seem to lag behind in technology and never really catch up in terms of features or performance. The XV-N420B continues that trend for JVC and is about as basic as a progressive DVD player can be. No advanced features like DVD-Audio or SACD support, and run-of-the-mill progressive video performance. But, looking at the rest of JVC’s line of DVD products, I couldn’t find any real differences between their upper tier and this player, with the exception of DVD-A support. Having tested most of JVC’s line at one point or another, the difference in video performance is usually minimal.

The N420 is built on the ESS Vibratto II CL MPEG decoder. ESS is fairly common in the mainstream market and is used by other companies like Denon and Cary Audio. Unfortunately, most other manufacturers don’t rely on this chip for I/P conversion and usually couple it with an outboard de-interlacing solution. The ESS chip itself is pretty average overall on its own.

De-Interlacing

The N420 performed about average for its price range with our de-interlacing tests. Like most all-in-one solutions, the ESS chip does okay with film-based material but is a flag-based de-interlacer. As soon as a bad flag is encountered, it drops to video mode. This results in combing and usually an obvious loss of resolution in the video signal. Both of these can be pretty annoying if encountered frequently. We at Secrets always recommend using players that rely on cadence-based de-interlacing, since most of these issues can be avoided.

The N420 is not motion adaptive, which is almost unacceptable this late in the game. Again, here is a manufacturer that is touting their progressive scan processing as state-of-the-art, when we think it is really one of the worst you can get. I also noticed some painfully obvious artifacts with our resolution strip charts that reminded me a lot of scaling artifacts. The resolution lines were not crisp and clearly defined from each other, but instead showed what looks almost like moiré patterns.

The diagonal line processing in this player was very bad. Using the 3 angle pattern on the Silicon Optix Benchmark DVD, the JVC showed significant aliasing in all three angles. Anyone who watches a lot of video-based material (e.g., DVDs that contain TV programs) may want to steer clear of this player.

Core Performance

The core performance of the N420 is also pretty mediocre. I was hoping that this side of the player might make up for the shortcomings of the I/P converter. The N420 will not pass a below black pluge signal, but its black level is appropriately set up for 0 IRE and can be switched to 7.5 IRE. The white level measured in at 101 IRE, which is within our acceptable range.

The video frequency response is a bit high in the upper end. This produces a rather harsh look in fine detail with artificial ringing evident. It is important that a player maintains a flat response, so that artifical information is not added. This will lend to a “digital” appearance with an exaggerated harshness to the picture.

Pixel cropping was excessive on the sides of the image. Both the left and right side were clipping 5 pixels each, but the top and bottom were perfect.

The ESS chip did pretty well with our chroma testing. In fact, it did better with this player than it does with most of the Denons that use a similar chip. This ESS chip is probably a different iteration of the Vibratto II. The Denons have been showing some nasty performance with an alternating 3-2 cadence test, but that was not the case here. The JVC looked clean, with no obvious issues. The ESS is not engaging any chroma filters that I noticed either. Using a vertical chroma resolution pattern from AVIA Pro showed that the full resolution was present. Unfortunately, this player does suffer from over a full pixel of Y/C delay, which contributes even more to the ringing artifacts the artificial sharpness is adding.

The player’s responsiveness overall was quite sluggish. Menu navigation and initial loading times were extremely slow. I also thought the remote was poor. It it extremely small and hard to navigate. The layer change was quick though and clocked in at about a quarter of a second.

Conclusions

Overall, I would have to give a thumbs down on the JVC XV-N420B player. The under-$100 market of DVD players is full of options right now and most are better than this one. There are some gross oversights in the core performance, but its progressive performance is about average for this price range. With such a large below-$100 market right now, I was really hoping to see more manufacturers try and separate their players from the crowd. With this player, that was not the case.

Video Frequency Response
JVC

Divider

Terapin - TT-2600DVD

MPEG Maker: Media Tech
MPEG Model: MT1379G
Deinterlacer Maker: Media Tech
Deinterlacer Model: MT1379G
   
MSRP: $69.99
Website: www.terapintech.com

TT-2600DVD - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

I picked up the Terapin player due to the requests on one of the forums to have me to include it in the budget benchmark. Evidently some forum members had obtained this player and spoken very highly of it.

The Terapin is based on the Media Tech chip, which is the reason for the praise. This chip makes the Terapin player extremely fast in both navigation and chapter skips. It also has a near seamless layer change with only a fraction of a second hiccup in our test.

Unfortunately for our other core testing, the player didn’t fare so well. Media Tech players do not pass blacker-than-black and this player’s white level was a bit low at 97 IRE. The player also suffered from Y/C delay at just over a full pixel. The video frequency response is a bit rolled off in the upper band and I also noticed some noise in the image that looked to be power induced. I used the same outlet on my Exact Power EP-15A that I used for all the other players so I can only surmise that this is something inside the players power supply.

The Media Tech chip employs chroma filters similar to the Faroudja de-interlacers. This MPEG decoder has all forms of the chroma bug but masks them in progressive mode, giving it a borderline score on our tests. The only exception is this player doesn’t pass the ICP test like the Faroudja-based players do.

The Terapin is not cadence-based like the Vivo Vision but is motion adaptive. Overall it did fairly well with our de-interlacing tests but still showed some weaknesses on our flagging tests.

Overall the Terapin is a decent player given the price. It could use a little work, but its quick navigation can be a bit spoiling.

Video Frequency Response
Terapin

Divider

JVC - XV-S60

MPEG Maker: Mediamatics
MPEG Model: Pantera II
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediamatics
Deinterlacer Model: Pantera II
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.jvc.com/main.jsp

XV-S60 - Smart

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Layer Change
Responsiveness
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels

We are getting to the point where reviewing another Mediamatics-based player gives us a certain feeling of deja-vu (all over again). This JVC is essentially identical in every key way to the JVC XV-D723GD we reviewed last time, minus the DVD-A support. The menus and displays are the same, the deinterlacing is the same, and the firmware appears to be exactly the same. All the quirks we outlined in that report are still there, including the annoying way that the interlaced output is derived from the progressive output, and is thus affected by the progressive deinterlacing mode. We informed Mediamatics and JVC about this problem on the 723GD, but apparently the news never made it to the right people.

Rather than go over all the quirky features of the JVC, it's easier to just read the previous review.

Video quality was very good. As we said in the previous review, if you can live with the quirks, the basic video quality is excellent, and it has some nifty features. Given that this new player is even cheaper, it might be worth considering.

Divider

Liteon - LVD-2001

MPEG Maker: Sigma Design
MPEG Model: EM8500
Deinterlacer Maker: Sigma Design
Deinterlacer Model: EM8500
   
MSRP: $129.99
Website: http://www.liteonit.com

LVD-2001 - 480P

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Video Levels
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

LVD-2001 - 720P

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Video Levels
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

Deinterlacing

The Liteon LVD-2001 is another Sigma-based player similar to the Bravo D1 and Momitsu offerings. Since it uses the Sigma chip, it offers a slew of features including progressive playback as well as scaled video.

Unfortunately, the Sigma chip isn’t very good at deinterlacing and really needs to be coupled with a better standalone solution. We think it is the best MPEG decoder out there, but it needs to be used strictly for that, rather than also for deinterlacing. As you can see from our results, this solution is essentially a flag-based design, which causes the unit to trip up frequently with bad material.

The Basics

Unlike the Bravo and Momitsu players, the Liteon does not feature a DVI output. This is really a shame since the video analog section of this player is horrible. This is what we found with the Bravo as well, but its issues were remedied via DVI. If you scroll down to the measured frequency response chart shown below, you’ll notice this player is badly rolled off from about mid-frequency and higher. In fact, looking at the multiburst pattern from Avia, we found smearing of almost all high frequency information. In other words, don’t expect any fine detail when watching DVDs with this player. The roll off was the worst with the player in 720p or 1080i modes, but it was still far from acceptable with a 480p output.

The LVD-2001 also suffers from 25 nanoseconds of Y/C delay in both chroma channels, and its default white level is set extremely hot at 107 IRE. Some other drawbacks noted in the test were the rather loud transport, a non user friendly remote and some scaling artifacts.

On the plus side, this player offers automatic aspect ratio control regardless of output resolution, decent handling response and a good price.

While this player does offer a great feature in terms of a scalable output, its poor video analog stage pretty much cancels out anything gained. Using a progressive player that offers only 480p out, but with a better analog stage, will result in a much nicer picture overall.

Video Frequency Response
Liteon

Divider

Kenwood - DVF-8100

MPEG Maker: ALi
MPEG Model: M3355A
Deinterlacer Maker: ALi
Deinterlacer Model: M3355A
   
MSRP: $150.00
Website: http://www.kenwoodusa.com

DVF-8100 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

The DVF-8100 looks to be a return to form for Kenwood and is very reminiscent of the DVF-3080 I reviewed a short while ago. It is based on the same chipset, but some improvements have been made. Unfortunately, there are not enough improvements to put it back into the same league as Kenwood’s Sovereign players.

De-interlacing

The DVF-8100 is based on a newer all in one video chipset made by ALi. I’ve tested only one other player that incorporates an ALI chip. That is probably a good thing though, as this chip’s performance isn’t very good.

In our progressive performance tests, this player didn’t perform very well at all. It passed the most basic 3-2 tests, but its flag-based performance was well below average. It would not lock onto a 2-2 cadence, or any cadence that contained a break or change. As a progressive player, the DVF-8100 stacks up near the bottom.

Core Performance

The core performance wasn’t much better. The DVF-8100 does not pass a below black pluge signal, and its default (and only) black level is 7.5 IRE. The default white level of the player is also unsatisfactory and measured in at a high 104 IRE. This results in an exaggerated look in the brighter areas of the image. It also creates problems in the calibration process as white is not at its intended point.

Y/C delay measured in perfect with no signs of Y/C or Pb/Pr delay at all. The chroma performance is decent, but it does not pass our 3-2 alternating or 4:2:0 ICP tests. The 8100 does not seem to be filtering the chroma channels, as full vertical resolution was retained on our test patterns.

User Interface

The DVF-8100 is a mixed bag in terms of user interface. The player can be a bit sluggish with load and navigation times, but its layer change is near seamless. Pixel cropping was excessive on the right side of the image (9 pixels) but at or near zero everywhere else. I still don’t understand how the most basic things like this can get overlooked. Testing for issues like this is very simple, and a little more attention to detail would go a long way in the performance area.

During my subjective viewing I noticed a lot of onscreen clutter. The menus and visual indicators were very intrusive and didn’t provide a very good viewing experience. I am not big on a lot of onscreen display features, especially during a movie.

Conclusions

I wish I had more to say about the Kenwood DVF-8100 player. It is at the bottom of my list in terms of performance, and is a shining example of how not to build a budget DVD player. I believe Kenwood is in the process of designing a new high line of DVD players, so I hope they will take the time to do it right and deliver a product more like their Sovereign line of players. But, this one is definitely not recommended.

Video Frequency Response
Kenwood

Divider

Toshiba - SD-6915

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 7
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 7
   
MSRP: $179.99
Website: http://www.toshiba.com

SD-6915 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Image Cropping
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Motion Adaptive

Here is another first in the DVD market. Toshiba has launched a universal changer, something I know a lot of you have been waiting for. Unfortunately you may have to wait a bit longer to get one that really works well.

The SD-6915 is based on the Zoran Vaddis 7 MPEG decoder instead of Toshiba’s own solution. This chip seems to be a bit of a step down from the recently released Vaddis 6. The Vaddis 6 had eliminated the chroma problems associated with the Zoran line, but here they return. The MPEG decoder passes our 3-2 Film and 2-2 Film CUE tests but not the ICP or 3-2 alternating tests.

As a de-interlacer, the chip did okay. Unfortunately, this solution is not motion adaptive and seems to be flagged based. On the core side, the player did pass a below black signal but has about 8ns of Y/C delay which is just short of our passing mark. Pixel cropping is not too bad, with 3 pixels being dropped from both the left and right side of the image.

From a user standpoint, this isn’t a very good player. The menus and chapter skips are quite sluggish and the remote is quite lame. There are a lot of shared buttons which makes navigation even more cumbersome then normal.

On the audio side, there doesn’t seem to be any adjustability for DVD-Audio or SACD. The time alignment and bass management settings seem to apply only to the built-in Dolby Digital decoder according to the manual. You also have to access the setup menus of the player to select which layer of the SACD you want to listen to.

While I am glad that someone has finally released a universal changer, this is a bit far from the level of performance I would have liked associated with it. It has quite a bit going against it both in the de-interlacing performance and core tests. Those looking for a universal changer might be better off holding out for something else down the line.

Video Frequency Response
Toshiba

Divider

Vivo Vision - DVDP-1500

MPEG Maker: Media Tech
MPEG Model: unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Media Tech
Deinterlacer Model: unknown
   
MSRP: $46.99
Website: unknown

DVDP-1500 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags

The Vivo Vision DVD-P1500 was a last minute entry. I was walking out of the local Circuit City and almost missed it as it was in a small pile on the floor near the cell phones for some reason. This was one of the cheapest players of this test coming in a bit under $50.

The Vivo Vision uses the Media Tech chip for its MPEG decoder and de-interlacing solution. This is similar to the recently tested Pioneer 578a and a few of the players in this Benchmark. This chip has some real strong points but also a few weaknesses. I still think, based on the tests being all over the place with this chip, that this solution could be quite good if implemented correctly.

On the core side, this player didn’t fare all that well. The Media Tech chip does not pass blacker-than-black in any configuration, and the player's white level was a bit high at 103 IRE. The video frequency response was also a bit too, rolled off in the upper end, giving the image a bit of a soft look. The player also suffers from over a full pixel of Y/C delay and at least a full pixel of Pb/Pr delay.

On the up-side, the 1500 is very fast, as most Media Tech players tend to be. Chapter Skips and menu navigation are just about instantaneous and there is no layer change delay to be seen.

On the de-interlacing side, this is one of the better implementations of the Media Tech solution. The player is motion adaptive, one of the few in this Benchmark. It is also cadence-based which was a real plus, especially at this price point. Unfortunately, the players cadence drops to video too easily as evidenced by its poor performance with our video flagging, bad edits, and incorrect progressive flag tests.

Given its rock bottom price tag, this player is darn good. With a bit more tweaking, it could have been at the top of this Benchmark’s list. Unfortunately it fell on its face a bit with our core tests.

Video Frequency Response
Vivo Vision

Divider

Sanyo - DWM-400

MPEG Maker: ESS
MPEG Model: VIbrato II
Deinterlacer Maker: ESS
Deinterlacer Model: Vibrato II
   
MSRP: $59.00
Website: www.sanyo.com

DWM-400 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The Sanyo DWM-400 is an ESS-based DVD player. The ESS chip is quite popular in some circles and is used extensively by Denon in its top end players. Unfortunately, Sanyo isn’t coupling it with an outboard de-interlacing solution like Denon, so you won’t be seeing that kind of performance here.

The core section did fair overall. On the plus side, the player has a perfect white level of 100 IRE and an excellent user interface that is quick and responsive. On the down side, the player exhibits over a full pixel of Y/C delay, is a bit too rolled off, and fails below black. It also has some rather excessive pixel cropping with 5 pixels cut on both the right and left sides of the image.

Like the results for the Denon players, the DWM-400's MPEG decoder passed all of our CUE tests with the exception of ICP since it doesn’t use the Faroudja chip. The ESS chip is one of the worst in regards to this, with noticeable banding when using 4:2:0 material (this is readily apparent in the title menus of Digital Video Essentials for the menu highlighting).

As a de-interlacer, the ESS is a bit below average. The chip is not motion adaptive and, like so many others, is flag-based. I really wish these all-in-one chips would get away from this and start using cadence-based solutions.

As a whole, the Samsung is a below average player. It didn’t really impress me with its core performance or as a progressive player. I would recommend looking elsewhere.

Video Frequency Response
Sanyo

Divider

V. Inc - Bravo D1 - Analog

MPEG Maker: Sigma
MPEG Model: EM-8500
Deinterlacer Maker: Sigma
Deinterlacer Model: EM-8500
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.vinc.us/

Bravo D1 - Analog - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP

Deinterlacing

This player uses the new Sigma Designs all-in-one chip, which has basic flag-only film detection, combined with a simple vertical filter for video mode deinterlacing. As with all chips of this type, it works well on film-based content when the flags are standard, but when the flags are non-standard or the content is not from a film or other progressive source, the image is much softer than it needs to be. In the worst cases, when the progressive flag is set to "true" improperly, the player will comb constantly. Its resistance to bad edits was poor, with 5 total combs in the Big Lebowski montage.

On the plus side, it handles the common "alternating progressive flag" encoding problem well, correctly treating it as progressive content.

The Basics

Black level on the analog output is incorrect at 7.6 IRE instead of the standard 0 IRE. There is no switch we could find to adjust it to 0 IRE black. White level is low, at 97.3 IRE, which was too low to pass. Both Y-Pb and Y-Pr have delay greater than the EIA standard of 5ns, again only on the analog output. The player does pass blacker-than-black in progressive mode, though we should note that because the player only does 7.5 IRE black, we were unable to check blacker-than-black at 0 IRE. However, like Toshiba players, we have passed this player on the blacker-than-black test.

The video frequency response on the analog output of this player is astonishingly rolled off, actually down a whopping 13 dB at 10 MHz. Considering that DVD goes all the way to 13.5 MHz, that's pretty bad. The rolloff was consistent even in the higher resolutions. Through the DVI connection, of course, there is no rolloff.

There are 0 video lines cropped from the top and bottom, and 0 video samples on the left and right, which is excellent.

The layer change is fast, at around 0.5 seconds, and responsiveness was 2.5, which is about average.

The scaling and DVI features of this player are what people are buying it for, and those features work well, as long as you use them together. The analog outputs have too many problems for us to recommend the player for use via an analog connection, but through a DVI connection the clarity is just stellar, with no chroma delay and no rolloff. The scaling engine in the player is excellent, producing clean output with no obvious jaggies or moire even on difficult material like the Avia resolution patterns.

The player is not without its quirks, however. In our limited time working with it, we found that while it has a zoom that is useful for zooming in on non-anamorphic letterboxed discs, the zoom snaps back to normal when you hit the chapter next button, and the subtitles turn off while it's zoomed in. These are clearly firmware quirks, and perhaps can be corrected, but they are nevertheless annoying.

Another minor issue is that the player always window-boxes 4:3 discs for you, even if your display has aspect ratio controls of its own. This is non-optimal for people with digital displays, as they often only sample 720 times across a scan line when taking in 480p content. With the window-box bars on, there are more than 720 sample intervals across the screen, and thus picture information gets lost. You can clearly see this on our Sony VW10HT test projector. We put the player in 16x9 mode, then viewed a 4x3-encoded resolution chart. Three fourths of the horizontal resolution was lost because the projector wasn't sampling more than what it thought it "needed" to do to capture the full 480p signal. If we put the player in 4x3 mode so it wouldn't add the window-box bars, then window-boxed using the display's aspect controls, the full resolution was visible. The player could really use a mode where it doesn't try to do any aspect control of its own, for people who have a display that can do a better job of aspect control than the player can. This is not an issue when using the DVI output.

Finally, we noted that when the player is in 16x9 mode, whenever subpictures (like menus and subtitles) are displayed on screen for 4x3 content they look very odd, like they've been scaled using a simplistic algorithm. The effect is jarring. The menus on Avia are a good example of this phenomenon because Avia contains both 4x3 and 16x9 menus. Put the player in 4x3 mode, and the effect disappears. We have seen similar behavior on other DVD players.

In the end, while we are impressed with the clarity that DVI brings, we're not ready to lose the excellent deinterlacing of the best chipsets in order to get it, and we weren't happy with the interface quirks mentioned above. For those who just want an inexpensive way to feed a digital display with a DVI connection and aren't as picky about deinterlacing and quirky UI, the Bravo D1 may well fit the bill.

Video Frequency Response
V. Inc

Divider

Philips - DVP-642

MPEG Maker: ESS
MPEG Model: Vibrato II
Deinterlacer Maker: ESS
Deinterlacer Model: Vibrato II
   
MSRP: $79.99
Website: http://www.consumer.philips.com

DVP-642 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The Philips DVP-642 is another ESS-based player. This player is almost identical in every way to the Sanyo DWM also reviewed in the July Benchmark.

For core tests, the Philips didn’t fare well at all. Y/C delay and navigation speed are the only real highlights and the player does extremely well with both. But unfortunately, the player has a low white level of 97 IRE, fails below black, has some excessive pixel cropping (5 on each side), and is a bit too rolled off in the upper frequency range.

The ESS Vibrato II is used for the MPEG decoder and also doubles as the de-interlacer. This chip is a decent MPEG decoder but a rather average de-interlacer. It is flag-based, so it tends to trip up on most of our flag tests. The player is not motion adaptive and failed almost every test that deals with poorly flagged film and video. The chip did pass all of our chroma tests with the exception of the ICP test.

I was hoping that since Philips is a huge electronics company, they would have put a bit more into this player.

Video Frequency Response
Philips

Divider

Magnavox - MDV458

MPEG Maker: Media Tech
MPEG Model: MT1397AE
Deinterlacer Maker: Media Tech
Deinterlacer Model: MT1397AE
   
MSRP: $59.99
Website: http://www.consumer.philips.com/global/b2c/magnavox/index.jhtml?divId=MAG&country=US&language=en

MDV458 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit

For those readers who don’t know it already, Magnavox is a splinter corporation of Philips. We tested a Philips player for this Benchmark, but surprisingly, it didn’t do as well as the Magnevox. The Magnavox uses an entirely different core section, which I found very surprising. Most the time splinter companies just rebadge the efforts of their parent company as a way to save money, but that doesn’t seem to be the case here.

The Magnavox uses the Media Tech MPEG decoder/de-interlacing solution. You may notice that this is a pretty popular solution with many of the budget players in this Benchmark. Magnavox did a decent job with the incorporation of the chip, but still not as good as I would have hoped for.

Like all the other Media Tech players, this one doesn’t pass blacker-than-black. The white level was also a bit on the low side at 96 IRE. When you go into the setup menus for this player, there are two video levels available, so make sure you use the Standard one. The other selection changes the IRE levels output from the player, creating peaks and valleys in what should be a smooth ramp.

This player is extremely fast with layer changes, and measured in at a hair under seamless. The menu speed on this player is superb, and chapter skips are instantaneous. Another big upside to this player is its PAL-to-NTSC conversion, which is excellent.

The Media Tech chip uses chroma filters for progressive playback that mask the chroma problems inherent in this MPEG decoder. This resulted in a borderline score for the chip.

On the downside, this player suffers from almost a full pixel of Y/C delay and has a bit of excessive pixel cropping. The video frequency response is also a bit more rolled off than I would have preferred.

On the de-interlacing side, the Media Tech chip is fairly dialed in. This player is motion adaptive but is still flag-based. The player didn’t trip up too much with improper flagging but did show a few hiccups now and again. It is a shame that this chip isn’t used to its full potential. It seems each player does a different job with it but none gets it completely right.

Overall, the Magnavox is a pretty solid budget performer. The core section could use some work but the blinding speed is an awesome feature.

Video Frequency Response
Magnavox

Divider

Sony - DVP-NS575P

MPEG Maker: Sony
MPEG Model: CXD9781R
Deinterlacer Maker: Sony
Deinterlacer Model: CXD9781R
   
MSRP: $89.99
Website: http://www.sony.com

DVP-NS575P - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit

DVP-NS575P - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit

Throughout our Benchmark testing, we have covered a good majority of the Sony ES line of DVD players. This is the first time I have tested a non-ES player. The Sony DVP-NS575P is as entry level as you can get. The player is built by Sony from the ground up and even incorporates a Sony MPEG decoder.

In our core tests, the Sony did OK. The player has a few shortcomings, including a full pixel of Y/C delay and some rather excessive pixel cropping (7 on the right and a combination of 5 from top and bottom). The player does pass blacker-than-black, and actually had a pretty decent video frequency response for a budget player.

In our chroma tests, the player incorporated a chroma filter in progressive mode that eliminates the chroma bug; however, the player still exhibits the problem with alternating flag material such as Monster’s Inc.

In our usability tests, the player did very well. This player’s interface is extremely fast with both menus and chapter skips, and also has a completely seamless layer change (seamless, meaning that you can't tell the layer is changing, there is no pause in the movie). I found that surprising since none of the ES players I have tested do this.

The Sony MPEG decoder also serves as the de-interlacer for the player. It has two modes of operation: Auto and Video. Funny thing is, they are both identical. I would recommend just leaving it in Auto and forgetting about it. The de-interlacer is flag-based and has a tendency to trip up with bad flags. Recovery time is pretty quick though, so artifacts shouldn’t be too obvious.

Overall, the Sony is a nice offering, with only a few issues. Compared to the other players in the July Benchmark, it is a decent contender.

Video Frequency Response
Sony

Divider

Denon - DVD-1710

MPEG Maker: unknown
MPEG Model:
Deinterlacer Maker: unknown
Deinterlacer Model:
   
MSRP: $179.00
Website: http://www.usa.denon.com

DVD-1710 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The DVD-1710 is Denon’s new entry level player. This no frills offering is similar in build and features to the DVD-1910, but lacks the DVI output and Faroudja chipset.

The 1710 looks to be based on a Panasonic chipset, but it was very difficult to tell. The MPEG decoder had been blacked out except for a serial number. There is also a possibility that it is based on a Mitsubishi chip.

The MPEG decoder is handling all of the duties, including de-interlacing, and overall is a pretty basic entry with mediocre abilities. The chip is flagged based and had a hard time with our tests overall. The chip is not motion adaptive and drops into video mode at the slightest sign of a cadence break. I think it is fair to say that this is the lowest performer we have seen yet from Denon.

On our core tests, the 1710 did better then I expected. The player will pass a below-black pluge signal, and its white level was at the extreme of our passing criteria at 98 IRE. Since the white level is a bit low, perceived and measured contrast will be a bit on the lower side, but not by too much.

The player passed all of our chroma tests with the exception of the interlaced chroma test. That was expected since it takes a special chroma filter to pass. Only Faroudja and DVDO have managed to make a chroma filter for this problem so far. The video frequency response was quite a bit better then I was expecting and even bested the DVD-1910. The response has a slight up shift as frequency goes up, but I didn’t see any annoying artificial ringing in the image from it.

Pixel cropping just barely made the borderline score. The player crops 5 pixels from both the left and right side of the image. I don’t understand why a manufacturer would allow for cropping on the sides of the image where it can hurt the image more than the top and bottom. The 1710 passed the Y/C delay tests and measured out at about 4 nanoseconds of delay, which is within the consumer spec.

For our usability tests, the 1710 didn’t fare too well. The transport is on the slow side, especially with menus. Response from the player was slow, both with inputs and chapter skips. The layer change clocked in at just over 2 seconds, which is unacceptable. There are a lot of inexpensive DVD players out there that are very responsive and feature almost no layer change at all. Denon is a company that usually stays on the cutting edge and these are things I would expect from them, even at this price point.

Overall, the DVD-1710 is a below average progressive scan player. I wasn’t expecting much at this price point, but I expect more from Denon. There are quite a few players near this price point that will outperform this player, notably the entry offerings from Pioneer. If you are looking for a solid low price offering, this is probably not the one.

Video Frequency Response
Denon

Divider

JVC - XV-N44SL

MPEG Maker: unknown
MPEG Model: unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: unknown
Deinterlacer Model: unknown
   
MSRP: $79.97
Website: http://www.jvc.com/main.jsp

XV-N44SL - Video (Normal)

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags

XV-N44SL - Film

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

XV-N44SL - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

XV-N44SL - Video (Active)

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

It has been a long time since we reviewed a JVC player, so I was anxious to see how the newer ones perform. There were several to choose from at the local store, and I selected this one as representative.

I was not able to determine what MPEG decoder this player is using. The video board was hard mounted to the transport, and I didn’t want to push my luck on getting it out and making the player completely inoperable before testing it.

The player fared low on our core tests. The N44 did not pass blacker-than-black, and the white level was extremely hot at 111 IRE. This would artificially pump up contrast levels and lead to clipping on some displays. The video frequency response was a bit rolled off in the upper area like most players in this Benchmark.

The player did well with our Y/C delay tests and fared pretty well with our chroma tests, failing only the ICP and 3-2 alternating flag tests. The user interface is a tad sluggish, especially with menus, but the setup menus are pretty easy to navigate.

On the de-interlacing side, the JVC features four different modes to choose from: Auto, Film, Video Normal, and Video Active.

None of the modes did very well. The Film mode did the best, but suffered from some severe combing artifacts in our motion adaptive tests. This player is flag-based and had some issues with bad flagging, making it drop to video more often than not.

The video modes on the JVC were pretty bad, contributing to some strange artifacts and loss of resolution. Despite having four different modes to choose from, I wasn’t very impressed with the player’s performance at all. If you are inclined to pick this one up I would recommend using either the Auto or Film mode.

I was hoping for a bit more from JVC here. I figured it would do as well if not better then the Toshiba, but unfortunately that was not the case.

Video Frequency Response
JVC

Divider

Apex - AD800

MPEG Maker: Mediamatics
MPEG Model: Pantera II
Deinterlacer Maker: Mediamatics
Deinterlacer Model: Pantera II
   
MSRP: $199.00
Website: http://www.apexdigitalinc.com

AD800 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

This is another of the Mediamatics-based players in the shootout, and it had essentially the same deinterlacing performance as the others. However, it had significantly worse video performance than the others. It has a significant rolloff of video high-frequencies, which manifests as a very soft picture, and it has worse video ringing than any of the Mediamatics-based players, which suggests that Apex skimped on the analog components after the DACs.

Like the Malata, the Apex has many options, and a similarly convoluted menu system. The Apex menus are slightly easier to understand, but only slightly.

Like the other Mediamatics-based players, the Apex has no chroma bug. Like the others, the Apex has difficulties with bad or non-standard flags and has no motion-adaptive video deinterlacing.

The Apex is inexpensive, and it's not a terrible player, but these days there are probably better choices for a similar amount of money. The Malata, for example, has better video quality, and is region-free to boot.

Video Frequency Response
Apex

Divider

Panasonic - DVD-S27

MPEG Maker: Panasonic
MPEG Model: unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: Panasonic
Deinterlacer Model: unknown
   
MSRP: $79.99
Website: http://www.panasonic.com

DVD-S27 - Auto 1

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S27 - Auto 2

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

DVD-S27 - Video

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

Ah, Panasonic! I remember the good old days when Stacey and I would test the RP line of players and really get excited about what they were bringing to the table. Unfortunately those days have gone and Panasonic has moved on to a more mass market approach, that, like Sony, is built by them from the ground up.

This player uses a Matsushita MPEG decoder, but I was unable to get the serial number off of it. Unfortunately this is not the same chip that we saw in the late great players that did so well in our Benchmarks before. This MPEG decoder suffers from all of the chroma issues and failed all of the corresponding tests.

The player crops a few pixels on the left and right side, 2 and 5 respectively and also suffers from a full pixel of Y/C delay. The S27 passes below black information, and its white level just squeaks by a pass with a measurement of 98 IRE.

The player has a very intuitive menu system for setup that is easy to use. Menu navigation on this player is extremely fast, but I found chapter skips to be a bit on the slower side. The layer change clocked in at 1.25 seconds, which is OK.

For de-interlacing, there are three different modes; Auto 1, Auto 2, and Video. The only difference between Auto 1 and 2 comes from Auto 2’s ability to handle a 2-2 cadence. This is great for PAL discs or for DVD handheld recorders that use this cadence. This de-interlacer is a flag reader and tends to trip up a lot with poorly recorded video. The video mode is exactly what it says, and forces video. Unless you watch a lot of PAL discs, I would recommend just leaving it in Auto 1.

I know there are a lot of high hopes for the upcoming Panasonic S97. I too am hopeful, but I realize that Panasonic is geared more at the mass consumer and not the videophile. While this shouldn’t preclude them from creating a great DVD player, it seems it makes most companies a bit less staunchy with the performance of their end product. The S27 is a pretty average budget player overall, but nowhere near the greatness of its predecessors.

Video Frequency Response
Panasonic

Divider

CyberHome - CH-DVD 500

MPEG Maker: Cirrus Logic
MPEG Model: CS98100
Deinterlacer Maker: Cirrus Logic
Deinterlacer Model: CS98100
   
MSRP: $119.99
Website: http://www.cyberhome.com

CH-DVD 500 - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive

This is perhaps the lowest-priced serious progressive player we've seen. While the MSRP is $119, we bought ours at Best Buy for $69. This player is using an all-in-one chip from Cirrus Logic. The chip does MPEG decoding, deinterlacing, and video encoding (digital/analog conversion of the video). From what we understand, the cost of the Cirrus Logic chip alone is around $20 in lots of 10,000. Someone is not making any money on this player.

Deinterlacing

The Cirrus Logic chip had the same issues as most of the other combined MPEG decoder/deinterlacers we've seen - it's a flag reader, and failed most of the deinterlacing tests that involve flag patterns other than the standard NTSC 3-2 film pulldown.

Amazingly, it wouldn't go to film mode on material that was encoded with the extremely common "alternating progressive flag" problem unless we forced it into film mode. There's no excuse for this. There must be hundreds of films with this problem, including many huge hits like Titanic, Austin Powers, and Monsters Inc. In fact, all of the players passed this test in shootout 1. We assumed that every chipset was designed to deal with this problem properly, so we stopped running the test in shootout 2. If we hadn't (just for grins) run the test again on this DVD player, we might never have found out that there are still players that fail to recognize this issue. Clearly, we can't assume that every chipset manufacturer has done their homework.

The Basics

What do you expect when you pay $69 for a DVD player? The biggest surprise for us was that this player does NOT have the Chroma Upsampling Error CUE). That pretty much throws down the gauntlet - if they can make a player with no chroma error for $69 retail, there's no excuse for any other manufacturers not to fix it.

White on this player is extremely low at 72 IRE, instead of the standard 100 IRE. You will really need to crank contrast up on your display, which will of course cause all the other inputs to have horrible white clipping, unless you can dedicate a separate memory on your display just for this DVD player. This player is one of two players in shootout 3 that is not capable of reproducing below black picture information. We used to think that below black was only used for standard PLUGE test patterns for setting black level, but it turns out that hard clipping the below-black information causes odd artifacts in shadow areas. Many films have shadow details encoded below black. When the player clips them off, they're lost for good and no tweaking of the display can cure it.

The video on this player is soft! We wonder if the anti-imaging filters were optimized for 480i instead of 480p, which would explain the steep roll-off. The player is down 1 dB at 6 MHz. It is down a little over 2 dB at 8.36 MHz. And finally it is down 3.56 dB at 10 MHz.

The layer change is ultra fast and we estimate it takes around .1 seconds. However the player is a bit schizophrenic on overall performance. Sometimes it jams from one menu to the next while other times it takes seconds. It also takes a long time to load a DVD. We rate the overall performance as a 2.

Both the Y-Pb and Y-Pr YC delay are also greater than 5ns. There are 2 pixels cropped from the top, 1 from the bottom, 5 from the left and 0 from the right.

Overall this player is somewhat better than we expected, given the price. Still, we'd certainly recommend spending a few dollars more to buy something that gets more of the details correct.

Video Frequency Response
CyberHome

Divider

RCA - DRC232N

MPEG Maker: @MLOGIC
MPEG Model: AML 3280C
Deinterlacer Maker: @MLOGIC
Deinterlacer Model: AML 3280C
   
MSRP: $89.95
Website: www.rca.com

DRC232N - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Image Cropping
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

The DRC-232N is the first player I have ever tested from RCA. I didn’t care for this player for the most part. Its interface is based on a menu screen that is always present if a disc is in the player but stopped, or if you have the player on with no disc in it. Personally I don’t like player-based menus unless I bring them up.

The RCA uses a MPEG decoder that I have never seen before, the @MLogic. This all in one chip solution didn’t do very well at all in any of our tests. On the core performance side, it failed just about everything. There is some slight Y/C delay as well as a bit of Pb/Pr delay of almost 5ns. The player fails below black, and its white level barely passes our video level test at 102 IRE. The video frequency response is quite rolled off in the upper frequencies, which tells me that the power supply isn’t very dialed in.

Overall, the user interface is a bit sluggish, especially in menus. The layer change was decent at 1 second, and chapter skips were pretty quick. This player fails all of our chroma tests.

The de-interlacing wasn’t very good either. The chip is flag-based and not motion adaptive. It did do a decent job with poor flags though as evidenced by the incorrect progressive flag test and bad edit test.

Overall this is a marginal player at best with a very poor core section and user interface.

Video Frequency Response
RCA

Divider

Kenwood - DVF-3080-S

MPEG Maker: ALi
MPEG Model: M3355A
Deinterlacer Maker: ALi
Deinterlacer Model: M3355A
   
MSRP: $119.99
Website: http://www.kenwoodusa.com

DVF-3080-S - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive

It has been awhile since we tested a Kenwood player. The last one came from Kenwood’s flagship “Sovereign” line. The 3080 is one of the more expensive in this budget Benchmark, but evidently price doesn’t always dictate performance (as we’ve shown for quite sometime now!!).

This is another player that uses a totally new MPEG decoder solution that we haven't seen before the July Benchmark, namely ALi. I checked their website, but unfortunately it didn’t have any real information on the chip used in this player, only one of their older ones.

The Kenwood fell pretty short with our core video tests. The player boasts a black level adjustment setting but still did not pass blacker-than-black. I was a bit surprised at this and wondered how it got past their QC. The white level was quite hot at 106 IRE, and the frequency response of the player had some roll-off in the upper band.

The Kenwood failed all of our chroma tests but didn’t show any signs of Y/C delay. The user interface is a bit on the sluggish side, but on a positive note, the layer change was completely seamless.

The de-interlacing was about average for this Benchmark. The solution is not motion adaptive and only did fair on our flag tests. This is a flag based player, so recovery times were pretty quick, but artifacts were very noticeable.

Of note, this player had some very strange artifacts during most of the testing, almost like blocking in the test patterns. All of the problems were repeatable, but did not show up on the other players.

Despite being from a pretty well known company, this player should probably be skipped when you shop. It seemed like too much slipped by Kenwood’s quality control people as evidenced by the core performance and artifacts inherent in the image.

Video Frequency Response
Kenwood

Divider

Zenith - DVB-412

MPEG Maker: ALi
MPEG Model: M3355A
Deinterlacer Maker: ALi
Deinterlacer Model: M3355A
   
MSRP: $59.99
Website: www.zenith.com

DVB-412 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
YC Delay
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
Image Cropping
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive

I recently tested the Zenith DVB-318 which not only offered a DVI output but also incorporated a Faroudja de-interlacer and scaler. The 318 did fairly well with our de-interlacing tests, as expected, but was pretty weak in our core testing. The 412 looks almost exactly like it but doesn’t use any of the same internals.

The 412 utilizes an MPEG decoder from ALi. This all-in-one solution is not nearly as good as the STMicroelectronics chip used in the 318. The ALi chip didn’t impress me at all with its performance. The chip has all of the chroma problems associated with it and most of them are quite bad in degree. The only core test this player did pass was the Y/C delay measurements. The 412 did not pass blacker-than-black information and had some rather severe pixel cropping issues with 9 pixels chopped from the right side and 2 from the top.

The white level of the player was quite high at 104 IRE. This would exaggerate contrast levels on most displays. The player did quite well with the layer change test, clocking in at just under a half second. The menus and chapter skips were also quite good, though not as fast as the Media Tech-based players.

The de-interlacing tests didn’t go so well either. The ALi chip is not motion adaptive which led to some obvious artifacts in the image, including instability. The chip is flag-based and showed a few hiccups with some of our flag testing. We really hope that companies will move away from this as time goes on.

Overall, this was a pretty disappointing showing from Zenith, especially after the 318. I would look elsewhere if you are in the market for an inexpensive, but decent progressive scan player.

Video Frequency Response
Zenith

Divider

Mitsubishi - DD-6040

MPEG Maker: Mitsubishi
MPEG Model: unknown
Deinterlacer Maker: unknown
Deinterlacer Model: unknown
   
MSRP: $129.99
Website: http://www.mitsubishi-tv.com/

DD-6040 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Video Levels
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Responsiveness
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Film Mode High Detail
Layer Change
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive

Deinterlacing

Mitsubishi has been one of the leading manufacturers of MPEG decoders, which have been employed by Pioneer for quite some time now. This player looks to be based on the same solution as the older Pioneers, as it has all of the CUE problems we saw there. I was unable to look inside the player unfortunately, so I wasn’t able to ascertain what deinterlacer the player is using. I know the DD-8040 employs the Faroudja chip, but this player does not.

The deinterlacer is flag-based, and therefore shows its weaknesses in our testing. Even as a flag reader this player did quite poor, failing tests that most flag readers pass. In fact, the only thing this player could do was lock onto a perfect film flag; otherwise it would trip up completely. I found this a bit comical since the front panel of the player states this player is a “True Progressive” machine, whatever that implies.

The Basics

The DD-6040 has an inexpensive build quality. It weighs very little and doesn’t seem to offer much either.

The only real notables I could find with the player were in the analog section. The video frequency response is quite flat, which is a rarity with a player at this price point. The white level of the player was dead on at 100 IRE, but the voltage levels expressed in the horizontal gray ramp indicate that there is some noticeable push in the mid gray area, which is indicative of an error in the gamma levels of the player. There was some slight Y/C delay, but it was still within the consumer standard of less then 5 nanoseconds.

While this player does come in at an attractive price point for a progressive player, I would suggest looking elsewhere. The progressive performance is poor at best, leaving much to be desired with the player as a whole.

Video Frequency Response
Mitsubishi

Divider

KLH - SVP500

MPEG Maker: Zoran
MPEG Model: Vaddis 6E
Deinterlacer Maker: Zoran
Deinterlacer Model: Vaddis 6E
   
MSRP: $54.99
Website: www.klhaudio.com

SVP500 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Blacker-than-Black
Sync Subtitle to Frames
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Video Levels
YC Delay
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Motion Adaptive

KLH has been in the audio business for quite sometime, and I guess they decided to enter the DVD world as well. I visited their website to get a bit more of an idea of what they were after, but unfortunately there is no information about their DVD player on the site.

This is the only changer in the July Benchmark, but it came in at a really low price so I thought I would throw it in the mix. The player is based on the Zoran Vaddis 6E which is a bit different then the Vaddis 6 used in the Cyberhome 300.

This chip seems to have a lot of issues associated with it. Zoran has not utilized any of the chroma filtering that the 5 and 6 chip use, so this player fails all of the chroma tests. The chip is also a bit more sluggish in the navigation than what I was seeing from the other Zoran players I’ve tested.

For our core tests, the KLH didn’t perform very well at all. About the only good thing I could find was that the player passes below black. When I measured the white level of the player I got a really low 90 IRE. This is very unfortunate, as it severely limits the display’s contrast levels, and whites will never look very pure or bright.

The player has some excessive pixel cropping, with a combined 7 pixels on the right and left sides. I was also disappointed to find some very severe Y/C delay as well as some bad Pb/Pr delay.

Once I got past the core tests, I tried some different material and found that the KLH does an admirable job at PAL-to-NTSC conversion. I used the video test material from the PAL version of Joe Kane’s Digital Video Essentials for this. There were no artifacts at all, and the image looked pretty good. This player does exhibit some odd artifacts though, regardless of output format. The image shakes quite a bit almost like a timing error. At first I thought it might be the de-interlacer trying to lock onto a flag sequence, but this player is locked in video mode, so that wasn’t the case.

The KLH bombed our de-interlacing tests. The Zoran chip is set up in forced video mode, so it doesn’t recognize any film-based material at all. This contributes to a lot of artifacts and a very soft image overall.

This is another entry into my "Worst DVD players I have tested yet" list. I am really surprised that a company would release a player with this many problems onto the open market, especially when it is their first offering, and I would imagine they want to make a good first impression. It really makes me wonder if they are actually looking at the product in use before they ship it.

Video Frequency Response
KLH

Divider

Cyberlink - PowerDVD XP

MPEG Maker: software
MPEG Model: Cyberlink
Deinterlacer Maker: software
Deinterlacer Model: Cyberlink
   
MSRP: $69.95
Website:

PowerDVD XP - hardware

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

PowerDVD XP - software

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

General Comments

PowerDVD is a desktop focused player with its own proprietary video and audio decoders. PowerDVD is not quite as feature rich as WinDVD, but has all the essential functions you would need in a DVD player. Most likely this is caused by the software leap frog effect. PowerDVD is the oldest player of the ones we tested and chances are the next release will have all the features of WinDVD and more. It does support multiple aspect ratios, video overlay controls, sound formats to multi-channel sound cards as well as SPDIF output.

PowerDVD does not have a remote option so you will have to find an alternate way to control the player from your seating position. There are some options discussed in HTPC Part II.

Deinterlacing Comments

This player was the first to surprise me. As you can imagine it gets somewhat monotonous testing player after player to see the same results over and over. I was caught off guard during the ‘Making of Apollo 13’ test. This is a wonderful example of combing for those of you wanting to see it. Most of these players and number of component players comb like crazy during this sequence. PowerDVD worked flawlessly. It never once showed any sign of combing and stayed in video mode the entire time. It also drop to video mode on the opening sequence of Galaxy Quest as it should. This broke my theory about software players being completely flag reading as both sequences are video material flagged as film. Unfortunately PowerDVD is not reading cadence, but instead dropping to video because of the disallowed progressive sequence flag which is turned on in this sequence. All in all PowerDVD is still a flag reading player

PowerDVD has become my player of choice when it comes to watching film based DVD which are plagued with flag errors like Buffy. While it drops to video mode when it should not, I would rather lose some resolution than deal with combing which I find very distracting. That is not to say PowerDVD does not comb during improperly flagged sequences, it does, it just does it less often.

On the reverse side, PowerDVD did the worst out of any players on the Video Essentials’ motion adaptive test. I could barely even look at the screen as it blurred and flickered uncontrollably.

Like the other players PowerDVD tested almost identical in both hardware and software mode. All other players did recover to film mode quicker in software mode, but with PowerDVD there was no difference.

As far as the picture quality, PowerDVD never seems as crisp as the other players and always had some noise in the shadows.

Divider

Intervideo - WinDVD 3.0

MPEG Maker: Software
MPEG Model: Intervideo
Deinterlacer Maker: Software
Deinterlacer Model: Flag Reader
   
MSRP: $29.95
Website:

WinDVD 3.0 - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

In the last shootout, we tested the software DVD decoders WinDVD 2.5 and PowerDVD 3.0, running on some reasonably powerful hardware, but not hardware tweaked and optimized for home theater. The AVS PC is a commercially produced PC designed for home theater from AV Science, so we hoped it would perform better than the PCs we tested for the last shootout. And, in fact, it did. The stutter we saw in the previous shootout was gone, and overall, the picture was stellar.

Alan at AV Science provided us with a PIII 1GHz w/ 256 MB of RAM running Windows ME. It had an ATI Radeon video card with 64 MB of RAM. It came pre-installed with XYX 1.6.0, PowerStrip 3.0 Beta Build 121, and WinDVD 2.5. The ATI video drivers were Version 4.13.7093. It was also equipped with an M Audio Audiophile 2496 soundcard. We ran the HTPC at 1280x72 @ 72 Hz. This was all pre-setup by AV Science. We did upgrade WinDVD to version 3.0.

That said, the deinterlacing performance was, as you would imagine, the same as before. PC DVD software still doesn't have the horsepower to do high-quality MPEG decoding and deinterlacing at the same time, so an HTPC has all the limitations of any flag-reading player, and doesn't have motion-adaptive deinterlacing. The Radeon does offer a fairly primitive motion-adaptive deinterlacer in hardware, but we were unable to get it working with WinDVD. It worked fine using the ATI (Ravisent) DVD player, but we found that DVD player to not be nearly as good as WinDVD. Usability was somewhat better than before, because the AVS HTPC comes with an infrared keyboard. Conceivably, you could set up macros and teach the key sequences to a Pronto or other learning remote, and have a DVD player nearly as easy to use as a standard video component, with the keyboard on your lap in your home theater room.

As before, the picture quality of the HTPC was incredibly good. There was no ringing at all, no chroma delay, just a smooth, detailed, accurate picture. In addition, WinDVD doesn't have the chroma bug. If you don't watch a lot of video-format DVDs or DVDs with odd flags (anime, for example), this HTPC may well fit the bill.

Divider

TheaterTek - DVD 1.5

MPEG Maker: software
MPEG Model: sonic
Deinterlacer Maker: software
Deinterlacer Model: sonic
   
MSRP: $69.95
Website: http://www.theatertek.com/

DVD 1.5 - hardware

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

DVD 1.5 - software

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

General Comments

This is currently the only specialized DVD player for the HTPC market. In the console player world this might be considered a boutique player. From the outside it looks and works nothing like any of the other players, but if you look under the covers it uses the Raviant filters provided by Sonic. These filters are known to have some of the best video quality available to software DVD players. The comparison to a boutique player does not lend itself to the price as TheaterTek is not really any more expensive than any of the other players.

Due to TheaterTek’s target market their feature set differs from that of the other players. It does not have on-screen controls and it only runs in full screen mode. All controls are accessed via keyboard shortcuts or for people with an ATI remote wonder, StreamZap or Grinder, TheaterTek supplies plug-in support for download off their website.

The other item you will noticed is lacking in TheaterTek feature list is support for 20 different surround formats. TheaterTek is truly targeted toward HTPCs were the surround processing will most likely be off-loaded to a receiver or surround sound processor.

I like TheaterTek’s interface, or should I say lack of interface, but it does sometimes cause a problems from the PC perspective. For instance, if you were working on a document and wanted to have a movie playing in a window there is no way to do this. Since there is no on-screen control panel trying to remember all the keyboard shortcuts when running the software without the remote can tax my memory at times.

All of the Software DVD players we are testing have aspect ratio control, but they are fairly limited when compared to TheaterTek aspect ratio control. Since TheaterTek will be used mainly on HTPCs it allows the user not only to choose the appropriate aspect ratio for your screen, but also customize it on a DVD by DVD basis. For instance, say the Buffy Season 1 DVDs when playing on a 4x3 screen have a 1 inch gap on the left side of the screen. With TheaterTek you can create a custom aspect ratio that will fill the space and save it for that disc. A week later when you watch the next episode it will use the proper aspect ratio you created. A month later when you put in the next Buffy DVD you can simply apply the aspect ratio you already created to this DVD as well.

Most functions in TheaterTek can be stored on a per DVD basis. You can tell TheaterTek to start playback so you don’t have to watch the FBI warnings every time you put in the disc. As with all of the DVD players video overlay controls are provided, but TheaterTek allows the adjustment on a per disc basis again, so when Buffy is too dim and you don’t want to mess with your properly calibrated display, you can adjust the brightness for the Buffy disc only. Senior members of the TheaterTek forum have posted settings for certain video cards and drivers that will result in proper output levels from the video card. So if you happen to have one of the cards they have tested then setting the proper video overlay values will be easy. You do have to remember to save these as your default settings or they will only work on the one particular DVD you are watching. Since I have not tested the output levels of the cards myself, I cannot say how accurate these measurements are. I can tell you at least for brightness and contrast they work very well with my setup.

Remember when I said you could force a pass on some of the tests by changing de-interlacing methods from bob to weave or vice-versa, well TheaterTek has thought of an innovative way to do this. They created a keyboard shortcut to change methods on the fly so you can test which one works best for the particular DVD. And again it is saved on a per DVD basis. I have used this feature to force 'bob' with 'B' movies that have regular occurring artifacts or flickers. While 'bob' reduced resolution, it is sometime better than the alternative.

TheaterTek – Video Comments

The player tests identical to Sonic CinePlayer and looks just as good. However, it suffers from all the same problems when dealing with problems in the flags on the DVDs.

If you have been contemplating purchasing TheaterTek over another player, do it for the features of the player mentioned above.

Divider

Intervideo - WinDVD Plus 4.0

MPEG Maker: software
MPEG Model: Intervideo
Deinterlacer Maker: software
Deinterlacer Model: Intervideo
   
MSRP: $79.95
Website:

WinDVD Plus 4.0 - hardware

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

WinDVD Plus 4.0 - software

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

General Comments

WinDVD claims to be the world leader in software DVD players and claims they have over 25 million users in their ‘reviewer’s documentation’. I have no reason to doubt them as many large PC manufactures such as IBM, Dell and Sony have chosen to include WinDVD as the software DVD player on the systems they sell. That certainly can give a company a lead in market share.

WinDVD’s target market is focused at users who purchase Dell, Sony or similar computers, followed by business travelers and early adopters of technology. This makes WinDVD more suited to personal computers or laptops and not focused towards the HTPCs. That does not mean it should not be used in a HTPC, but that HTPCs are an after thought for InterVideo. Of course, you cannot blame InterVideo. If I could sell 25 million users that have PCs and laptops software, I would choose the same focus.

WinDVD does give users the option to purchase a remote with the software. If you do not have a remote for your HTPC, choosing this player might be an attractive option. I have used the remote on several occasions and it fits in one hand and performs all the functions you need to control DVDs from your seat. It has enough range to bounce off my screen and control the HTPC behind me. The remote is not back lit and lacks standard DVD menu controls, but instead has a mouse control. Although it is nice to be able to control the mouse it would have been better to include menu controls.

All of those clients give InterVideo the resources to pursue interesting new features. For instance their ‘Time-Stretching’ feature allows you to watch a DVD in longer or shorter period of time while maintaining proper pitch (audio won’t sound like the chipmunks). This has some interesting applications, for instance you could watch a two hour movie on a flight that is only one and a half. I should mention that Time-Stretching will not work with the spdif output. As WinDVD has a large market in Europe where PAL DVDs are prevalent WinDVD leveraged their time-stretching feature to create TrueSpeed. TrueSpeed will play PAL DVDs converted from NTSC DVDs at the correct speed as they play 4% too fast.

Deinterlacing Comments

This player is best described as average when compared to the other players tested here. When the majority of players passed or failed so did WinDVD. It never combed the least number of times and conversely it never combed the most.

As for video quality it is not the best of the players and not the worst. It lands in between. Make sure you have the brightness and contrast set properly. The brightness was set substantially too high upon initial install, which effects picture quality.

Divider

Sonic - CinePlayer 1.5

MPEG Maker: software
MPEG Model: Sonic
Deinterlacer Maker: software
Deinterlacer Model: Sonic
   
MSRP: $49.95
Website: http://www.sonic.com

CinePlayer 1.5 - software

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

CinePlayer 1.5 - hardware

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

General Comments

Sonic CinePlayer 1.5 is a new version of Axeda’s CinePlayer version 4.0. As of April 2002, Sonic currently has an exclusive license to Axeda’s Ravisent filters for their software DVD player and control of the licensing in the personal computer market…. What does this mean? Well, the Ravisent filters were used in several other DVD players, but now Sonic gets to decided which of their competitors can use these filters and for what price. The Ravisent filters are known for their video quality (we will explore this a little later) TheaterTek, the X-Box and current version of the ATI player are some examples of players that used them.

One unique thing about Sonic is they allow you to download the Ravisent filters to be used with Media Player for $15. This could save you some money if all you are looking for is the video quality and not all the advanced functions of the DVD player. Interestingly enough, you could also use the $15 option with Zoom Player as a front end.

Sonic similar to InterVideo and CyberLink also makes a fair number of other software titles focused around video playback and creation for home use. However, Sonic has a fair number of titles dealing with the professional DVD creation. Reading through the reviewer guide I notice one interesting fact. Sonic claims their software is used in creating 90% of the commercially produced DVDs on the market. That would certainly give them in depth knowledge of DVDs and might make for a very interesting combination in future releases.

CinePlayer market focus seems to be in-between personal computers and HTPCs. Video quality and ease of use are first on the list of features. Out of all the players Cineplayer’s on-screen controls are the simplest. Fewer features make the control panel spaciously arranged and all buttons are clearly labeled with standard icons. During the tests I constantly switched between players. I found myself searching for the controls on the other players. Cineplayer’s control panel was very intuitive to use. In time you become familiar with the controls of which ever player you choose, but a simple interface will make life easier for others that use your HTPC.

There is no remote option for CinePlayer so you will have to set something up yourself if you wish to use a remote.

Deinterlacing Comments

This player like all the software players looked great on properly flagged video material, but it is not any better than the other solutions when it comes to dealing with errors in the DVD flags or deinterlacing video material. The word on the street isn’t wrong, the filters in this player and TheaterTek look very good, but there is room to improve in both these key areas.

Sonic's filters did have a slightly longer recovery time in hardware mode than in software mode. Which also turns out to be longer than the other players tested, but still within the 5 frame limit we use for a passing grade.

Divider

Intervideo - WinDVD 2000

MPEG Maker: Software
MPEG Model: Intervideo
Deinterlacer Maker: Software
Deinterlacer Model: Flag Reader
   
MSRP: $29.95
Website:

WinDVD 2000 - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

As HTPCs are becoming more popular for folks with digital front projectors, we thought it would be worthwhile to try our de-interlacing torture test on the two most popular software DVD players.

The PC used was PIII 600 with 128MB of RAM and a GeForce 256 video card set at 32-bit color. DMA was enabled on the DVD-ROM drive. We ran the PC at 60Hz.

The biggest drawback to this player was that, like the JVC, it pretty much only uses the flags and frame structure on the disc to make de-interlacing decisions. It doesn’t have a motion-adaptive video-mode de-interlacer, so if it thinks the material is video, it uses vertical filtering, and there didn’t seem to be a way to make it stop. Consequently, we were completely unable to get what we would consider an acceptable result with "More Tales of the City", the "Galaxy Quest" trailer, and other video mode or oddly formatted film titles.

We also were disconcerted by an overall stuttery quality in almost all pans, credit scrolls, etc. We did have DMA mode enabled, and tried both 60 Hz and 72 Hz refresh, but couldn’t get it to go away. Perhaps if we dug deeper and played with more caching and other parameters, we could have made the problem better. As it was, though, we found it distracting. A good example is in Chapter 12 of "Gladiator". You can see the software decoder stutter along as you pan over the city. (Update: We have now seen one HTPC that didn't have this stutter problem, so it is avoidable by choosing good components and setting the PC up optimally. However, we are still disappointed that a wide variety of PCs we looked at had the stuttering problem, even though all of them comfortably exceeded the minimum requirements of the software.)

And it almost goes without saying that a standalone DVD player with a remote, even a bad one, has significantly better usability than a HTPC DVD player. Trying to find the right key to pause, back up, and so forth in the dark was a huge frustration. And using the mouse was even more frustrating. If one cobbles together an infrared remote solution with a Pronto or other programmable remote and an IR receiver on the PC, this gets much better.

We were pretty much stymied when it came to calibration. There don’t seem to be enough controls to do the steps we’re used to from calibrating video displays. That said, the color was not too far off, and the brightness and contrast could be calibrated just fine.

For big Hollywood blockbusters where the flags are OK, the player did a great job. The basic video quality was excellent. In general, you almost never get visible ringing from a video card, and there was no trace of the chroma upsampling problem. There is no overscan or pixel cropping, so you see all of the picture, something you don’t get on any standalone player. Considering that if you already have a PC, buying a DVD-Rom drive and the software can be done for around $150 or so, it’s definitely a bargain way to get very high quality video.

Divider

Microsoft - Windows Media Center 1.0

MPEG Maker: nVidia
MPEG Model: NVDVD 2.22
Deinterlacer Maker: nVidia
Deinterlacer Model: GeForce 4600Ti
   
MSRP: $0.00
Website: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/default.htm

Windows Media Center 1.0 - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

This is Microsoft's first serious attempt to create a platform for a complete media center for a home. It combines music playback, DVD playback, still picture display, live TV, and a personal video recorder. The interface is fairly intuitive, and all the core functionality is available from an integrated infrared remote. We only evaluated the DVD player.

This is a unique product because the configuration we tested is only one of many possible configurations, and the final results will vary based on the hardware used. Even the software the PC manufacturer uses makes a difference, because Windows XP Media Center doesn't include a DVD decoder. Instead it relies on whatever decoder is installed on the machine, though it does integrate it into the Media Center UI.

For our setup we used an nVidia 4600Ti video card and the NVDVD decoder, which was developed in-house by nVidia. From our testing, we believe the Ti offers the best deinterlacing within the nVidia family, and NVDVD 2.22 offers the best decoding available right now. ATI video cards also do well when using the Catalyst 2.4 drivers, with the exception of the 9700. As of this writing the video drivers for the 9700 were not ready for prime time.

The machine we used was provided by the eHome team at Microsoft. The display drivers we used for testing were version 40.80, which at that time were unsigned drivers. 41.09 are the most recent drivers available from nVidia. You can also purchase NVDVD 2.22 directly from the nVidia website for $39.95.

Deinterlacing

The new nVidia hardware and software is supposedly designed to offer two features that had been previously unavailable on an HTPC: cadence-based film mode analysis (instead of flag-based), and motion-adaptive deinterlacing. Unfortunately, we were unable to see cadence analysis in action. No matter how we set the drivers and settings, we still got results that clearly pointed to flag reading.

We did get motion-adaptive deinterlacing working, and it's a great step in the right direction for handling video content. However, what we saw still didn't look nearly as good as the best motion-adaptive video deinterlacing in chips such as the Silicon Image SiI504 or Genesis FLI2200, or even Sony's DRC chips. The test patterns we used didn't look quite right, as though one field was dominant and the other recessive. We suspect that the algorithm nVidia is using uses one field as the primary source for the final frame, and mixes in some of the other field in order to improve the vertical resolution. But they appear to not be giving each field an equal share. One field would generally be dimmer in the final mix, and the other field brighter, as though the temporal filter coefficients weren't 50/50. In addition, on the Video Essentials Zone Plate it just wouldn't give us a full-resolution image, even on the film-mode section. By our standards, that's a fail.

Since we weren't able to get cadence reading working, we had to fail the player on essentially all the "unusual flag" tests.

The Basics

The interface was smooth and refined, with generally well designed menus and graphics. Navigating the menus to get to the various functions like DVD playback was easy. The remote felt very much like a DVD remote, and had most of the standard buttons. There were some odd exceptions. For example, the remote has only one menu button, labeled "DVD menu," whereas a DVD player always has two, labeled "menu" and "top menu." After some experimentation, we found that the "DVD menu" button corresponds to "top menu," which is the button on a DVD player that navigates to the topmost menu on the disc. We found this incredibly annoying, as we're used to using the normal "menu" button to return to the last menu visited. If you're several levels deep in the menu system, play some video, realize you've made a mistake, and want to go back to the menu you were just looking at, Media Center has no way to do that.

In addition, the remote has no "subtitle" button, "audio" button, or "angle" button. These are all standard DVD buttons, and on some discs, you need to use them to access features. Media Center has an incredibly convoluted and non-standard way of selecting subtitles and audio tracks that we are sure would not work with some discs.

To select a subtitle or audio track, one must navigate to the Media Center menu, go several menus deep into the options, and then select a subtitle language from a huge list of essentially every available language that a DVD could use. To get to German, for example, you have to go through Armenian, Azerbaijanian, Basque, etc. by pressing a button many many times. You get the same set huge of languages to choose from no matter what languages are available on the disc. Who thought this was a good idea? As a method of setting your "preferred" subtitle language, it makes some sort of sense. As a primary method of changing subtitles, it's terrible. And what happens if a disc has three or four "English" audio tracks, as many often do? There isn't any way to distinguish between them. You can, in most cases, change audio tracks from the DVD's own menus, but if you're used to starting the movie and hitting the "audio" button to get to a commentary track or switch to the 5.1 audio, Media Center doesn't offer that as an option.

The end result is that Media Center feels almost like a standalone DVD player, but the omissions and deviations from the DVD standards are frustrating. Still, it's by far the best out-of-box UI for an HTPC that we've ever seen. For most people, these menu issues will be minor annoyances; the core UI functionality works fine.

The overall picture quality from the hardware and NVDVD was excellent. Like other HTPCs, there is no pixel cropping and extremely clean video with almost no visible ringing or noise. Of course like most video cards, there are no anti-imaging filters other than basic EMF and RMI because a PC video card must run at several different scan rates and you can only really design a filter for one scan rate. The chroma upsampling in nDVD is the best we have seen from any DVD player.

As a DVD player, Windows XP Media Center (with NVDVD decoder) worked well, in fact better than any HTPC we've looked at so far. The remote gives you most of the feel and usability of a standalone player, which has been a sore point for many people who are uncomfortable with using a PC as a media hub. The deinterlacing still isn't at the level of the best standalone players, but it's come leaps and bounds in the last year or so.

Divider

Cyberlink - PowerDVD 3.0

MPEG Maker: Software
MPEG Model: Cyberlink
Deinterlacer Maker: Software
Deinterlacer Model: Flag Reader
   
MSRP: $49.95
Website:

PowerDVD 3.0 - Auto

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Bad Edit
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay

The PC used was PIII 600 with 128MB of RAM and a GeForce 256 video card set at 32-bit color. DMA was enabled on the DVD-ROM drive. We ran the PC at 60Hz.

This player had many more features than the WinDVD solution, which made navigation more pleasant. We had all the same problems that we had with PC players in general as far as usability, calibration, and the constant use of vertical filtering as a deinterlacing algorithm. We also had trouble with the stuttery pans, though again, it might be that changing parameters on the PC could help with this.

PowerDVD seemed to do a little better at identifying video it shouldn’t weave together. It handled the "Apollo 13" documentary much better than WinDVD, for example.

We saw the chroma upsampling problem when in software mode. We later tried it on another machine that had a video card with hardware assist, and the problem went away.

Like WinDVD, on good material PowerDVD looked really great. Resolution was perfect, and we got the whole image. We hear each software program has a few discs that it doesn’t play right, so it’s probably worthwhile to get them both, considering the incredibly low price.

Divider

DScaler - 4.1.0

MPEG Maker: N/A
MPEG Model: N/A
Deinterlacer Maker: Open Source
Deinterlacer Model: N/A
   
MSRP: $0.00
Website: http://deinterlace.sourceforge.net

4.1.0 (4357) - Default

Passed Borderline Failed Not Tested
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Motion Adaptive
Layer Change
Responsiveness
Chroma, 3-2 Film Flags
Chroma, 3-2 Alt. Flags
Chroma, 2-2 Film Flags
Video Levels
Blacker-than-Black
YC Delay
Image Cropping
Sync Subtitle to Frames

General Comments

DScaler is a video deinterlacer that can be used with any interlaced NTSC or PAL video source captured via on one of the supported cards in either analog or digital format. Since most of the standard or at least cheap video capture cards all use the same chipset there are a large number of supported cards.

DScaler is an open source project to create a software deinterlacer. Looking at the version numbers it is easy to tell this is not a new intuitive. Version 4 of DScaler is currently in alpha state and is the version we tested, however, version 3 was experimented with and had similar results.

Upon first look, DScaler seems somewhat complicated with all its menus and options. Luckily it is very simple to use. It comes with several methods of de-interlacing including 3:2 and 2:2 pull down as well as several video modes some of which include a form of motion adaptive deinterlacing. Of course there is an auto mode to pick the right algorithm for the current material. Sounds promising doesn’t it?

DScaler, like the players above, has aspect ratio control and all other features you need to setup your display properly. Since the DVDs are played through a console DVD player all other functions and sound are off-loaded to that player.

Deinterlacing Comments

This was the wild card of the bunch and I included it here to see how the budget HTPC could do up against the best deinterlacing chips on the market. To summarize the results, it did okay. It passed some tests the other players failed (like chapter breaks), but in other cases it failed when I figured it should have passed.

There are a couple of test where I have failed DScaler but it does come very close to a pass. In the motion adaptive test, video essentials zone plate, it never flickered once but it did dim for a second in the first part of the test. I had to fail it but it did come closer than any of the software players. With the bad edit sequence from the ‘Making of the Big Lebowski’ I had DScaler pass the test several times and fail several times. On the official results it is a fail, but if you watch the sequence a couple of times in a row Dscaler seems to be able to figure out what it is suppose to do and will pass the test.

The video quality of DScaler is limited by the video capture card. I realize the Haupauge WinTV card is not the cleanest capture card but it is typical of the quality of cards available for under $100. No matter how I adjusted the settings there was always some noise in the signal. The noise filters supplied with DScaler did help material from bad VHS tapes but hindered picture quality if turned on with DVD playback.