Home arrow Cables arrow Wireworld Eclipse 5 and Silver Eclipse 5 Audio Cables
Wireworld Eclipse 5 and Silver Eclipse 5 Audio Cables
A Secrets Cable Review
E-mail
Written by Chris Groppi   
Sunday, 17 February 2008
Article Table of Contents
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3

On the Bench

I used my Smith and Larson Audio Woofer Tester 2 impedance analyzer to measure the impedance of both the speaker cables and the interconnects. This test is most applicable to speaker cables. The interconnects drive very high impedance loads with very small currents, and are therefore much less effected by cable impedance. I tested the interconnects anyway. I did not have the necessary equipment to measure frequency response, time domain response, or noise pickup, and was therefore not able to measure the filtering properties of the AC power cords.

For the tests I did do, I made some 10 Ohm loads for the speakers and interconnects. The speaker load is a five-way binding post with a 2% 10 Ohm resistor across the terminals. The interconnect load is an RCA jack with another 10 Ohm resistor across the terminals. The Smith and Larson woofer tester is designed to measure low impedances, so I could not use a high resistance load resistor to test the interconnect. In each case, I calibrated the impedance analyzer with the same loads used to measure the cable. This removes the impedance of both the load and the test leads. I then inserted the cable between the load and test leads, and did a 256 point impedance sweep from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. I used 48 kHz sampling, to try to avoid any roll off from the anti-aliasing filter. I did measurements with the cable laid flat, and also coiled up into about a 12” diameter coil. Measurements were performed on a 3m length of Silver Eclipse 52 speaker cable, and a RCA terminated Silver Eclipse 52 interconnect. As the geometry is identical, I did not separately test the Eclipse cable. I also tested my normal cable as a comparison, although I didn't include those plots in the review.

A perfect cable would show zero electrical resistance, and would add no phase angle at any frequency. Such a cable would have no effect at all on the load impedance, and I’d measure 10.000 Ohms resistance and 0 degrees phase angle at all frequencies. Since cables are not perfect, we will always see some additional resistance over 10 Ohms. In addition, any reactance in the cable will cause the phase angle to deviate from zero degrees.

wireworld-5-cables-figure-9.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here (graph above), we see a plot of the Silver Eclipse speaker cable’s phase angle as a function of frequency for both straight (solid) and coiled (dashed) geometries. The rise of the phase angle with frequency is a basic feature of almost any cable design driving such a low impedance load. The important thing to notice is the y-axis: the phase angle introduced by these cables is spectacularly low. Uncoiled, the maximum phase angle is 0.180, which rises to 0.220 when coiled. The small bump at 60 Hz is a measurement artifact from 60 Hz AC pickup. This result is a full order of magnitude (a factor of 10) less than my usual speaker cables measured the same way! In addition, the phase angle increases only a little when coiled. I did not plot the resistance, as it did not change much with frequency. The resistance added by these cables is also a spectacularly low 0.01 Ohms. This is also about a factor of 10 better than my normal cables. I really can’t imagine better measurement results.

wireworld-5-cables-figure-10.gif 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The interconnects show a similar story (graph above), but add even less phase angle to the load impedance. Maximum phase angle introduced is only 0.080. This is again about 10 times lower than my usual interconnect. The same small 60 Hz bump is there, again from the measurement setup. There was no significant difference between straight and coiled geometries, so I only plotted one line.

In addition to direct impedance measurements, I also measured the series inductance and shunt capacitance of the cables. I measured 300 nH series inductance and 3.3 nF of shunt capacitance at 15 kHz for the silver eclipse speaker cable. This works out to 30 nH/ft inductance and 330 pF/ft capacitance. The silver eclipse interconnect measured 135 nH series inductance (20 nH/ft) and 2.0 nF shunt capacitance (300 pF/ft). The characteristic impedance implied by these numbers is 9.5 ohms for the speaker cable and 8.2 ohms for the interconnect. This is fully consistent with the cable’s very low measured phase angle driving a 10 ohm load.

Conclusions

Yes, these cables are expensive. But they made a real improvement in the sound of my system, even when compared to the very good cables they replaced. They also showed 10 times lower reactance, and 10 times lower resistance than my usual cables. This combination of great sound and great measured performance earns them my highest recommendation. If your system is already fairly polished, these cables (or some of Wireworld’s more reasonably priced cables) could be the last little step towards audio nirvana.

Comments (8)add comment
Where are the rest of the measurements?
written by Silvertone , February 18, 2008

What happened to inductance and capacitance readings for the speaker cables and interconnects? These are crucial so one can be sure the frequency response is being manipulated somehow.



...
written by JEJ , February 18, 2008

I am sure the data are available, so I will ask Chris to post the impedance graphs. They do not display the exact amount of reactance (inductance and capacitance), but they indicate the overall reactive impedance in ohms, which is related to the amounts of reactance.

Resistance is the key
written by Charles Domingue , February 19, 2008

If these speaker cables measured ten times lower resistance (0.01 ohms) vs your previous cables, assuming 10ft. cables that would imply that a gauge size of around 20 for the original cables. No wonder these cables sounded better.

...
written by CG , February 19, 2008

I will make some more measurements to get the shunt capacitance. That requires a slightly different measurement technique. I think that the impedance change introduced by the cable is far more important than the shunt and series reactance numbers, but they are easy to measure in any case. I will update the review with those plots this weekend after I get a chance to measure the cables again.

I don't personally think resistance is the key, except for bass performance. The resistance is largely irrelevant for the midrange and treble, where current draw is very small. The non-rounded numbers are 0.007 Ohms for the wireworld speaker cable at 20 kHz, and 0.068 Ohms for my normal speaker cable (Nordost Red Dawn). This works out to the Nordost having about 17 gauge effective wire size (about 1 mm^2 area) which makes sense given that cable's construction.


...
written by JEJ , February 29, 2008

Chris sent me the information on the inductance and capacitance, and I inserted it into the review as the last paragraph before the conclusions.

Proffesional Scientist, Electrical Engineering?
written by Daryl Patterson , September 01, 2008

The speaker wire you evaluated is 10 AWG and you measured 7 milliohm for 3 meters (10ft)?

Should be about 20 milliohm, nearly three times that.

You say the evaluated interconnects capacitance measures 300 picofarads per foot?

Quality interconnects have about twenty times less capacitance than that.

The 2 nanofarad capacitance you say you measured for the interconnect will present a load to the source componet of 4 kilo-ohm at 20khz which will rolloff high frequencies with many source componets.

Line level inputs have high input impedances (20,000 to 100,000 ohms) and you need interconnects with higher characteristic impedances not lower as you mention in the review.

Because of the high input impedance of line level inputs you should have no interest in the loop impedance (R and L) of interconnects as it will always be insignifigant.

What you are interested in for interconnects is shunt capacitance.

How is it that all of these glaring facts escaped the notice of a "proffesional scientist and electrical engineer".


...
written by JEJ , September 02, 2008

Chris' measurements of these cables are what they are, not what you think they should be. That is the nature of cable design, where there are so many configuration possibilities, the measurements are often a surprise. And he did measure the shunt capacitance. It's in the last paragraph before the Conclusions.

...
written by C. Groppi , September 02, 2008

The speaker wire is more like 8 or 9 AWG by conductor area, not 10AWG as advertised.

Depending on whose data you look at, the measured resistance is perfectly in line with the expected resistance for a 10 ft cable.

These cables have significantly higher capacitance than usual, so that the characteristic impedance of the cable remains ~10 Ohm given the inductance.

You (Daryl Patterson) say that line level inputs have high input impedances (20,000 to 100,000 ohms) and you need interconnects with higher characteristic impedances not lower as you (Chris Groppi) mention in the review.

I disagree.

Only the inputs have high impedance. Line level outputs have low impedance.

The loop impedance is only of interest here because of the tuned LC nature of the cable geometry. Shunt capacitance and series inductance are mentioned as well.



Write comment
 

busy

 
Velodyne
SVS
Magazine Web Design - M Digital Design Solutions for Publishers