<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Blog - John E. Johnson, Jr. - April 28, 2008: THAT&#8217;S IT ON THE SUV, EVEN THOUGH I NEED ONE TO CARRY BIG SPEAKERS.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/04/28/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-april-28-2008-thats-it-on-the-suv-even-though-i-need-one-to-carry-big-speakers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/04/28/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-april-28-2008-thats-it-on-the-suv-even-though-i-need-one-to-carry-big-speakers/</link>
	<description>Secrets of Home Theater and Hi Fi</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ovation</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/04/28/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-april-28-2008-thats-it-on-the-suv-even-though-i-need-one-to-carry-big-speakers/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>ovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/blog/2008/04/28/daily-blog-john-e-johnson-jr-april-28-2008-thats-it-on-the-suv-even-though-i-need-one-to-carry-big-speakers/#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Wow.  4$, eh?  I wish I was paying 4$/gal.  At the 1.359/litre yesterday, I'm paying 5.13$/gal.  Actually I quite agree that my next vehicle will be more fuel efficient (at 4$/gal I was already thinking about it, and now that it is over 5$, I'm looking to go even smaller/more efficient).  With two kids, there is a limit as to how small I can comfortably go, but it will certainly be a major factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  4$, eh?  I wish I was paying 4$/gal.  At the 1.359/litre yesterday, I&#8217;m paying 5.13$/gal.  Actually I quite agree that my next vehicle will be more fuel efficient (at 4$/gal I was already thinking about it, and now that it is over 5$, I&#8217;m looking to go even smaller/more efficient).  With two kids, there is a limit as to how small I can comfortably go, but it will certainly be a major factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
